JP38 would be heavenly
JWill we ever see it in DCS?
RNo, but there's still IL-2 and MSxplaineFS
JP38 dcs would be phantom levels of excitement for me
YI would swoon with the f4u and p38 in DCS.
It even fits completely in what seems to be their Pacific path
It even fits completely in what seems to be their Pacific path
Dwell. corsair is being made
Dbut with all these american planes, and brit planes, there is like what 3 german ones?
UStuka would be interesting - Sitting in the rear in VR could be a hoot!
WHey guys, I've managed to improvise a moving trim implementation for the Harrier with telemetry!
Apparently you can completely override DCS input subsystem and send back X/Y axis commands directly using
So in essence TelemFFB becomes two way telemetry.
So the caveats are: DCS input system overriden for control axes and FFB Spring control is overridden with TelemFFB too. But since the harrier has static FFB, no loss there.
This also opens up more possibilities to enhance DCS FFB experience
Apparently you can completely override DCS input subsystem and send back X/Y axis commands directly using
LoSetCommandSo in essence TelemFFB becomes two way telemetry.
So the caveats are: DCS input system overriden for control axes and FFB Spring control is overridden with TelemFFB too. But since the harrier has static FFB, no loss there.
This also opens up more possibilities to enhance DCS FFB experience
NDoes overriding the input subsystem break the Integrity Check that DCS runs?
WI don't think so, since no DCS system files are modified
NThat’s pretty cool regardless but even more so if it doesn’t
R@walmis so does that mean that it'll actually move the jets trim position in game?
WOpposite, since razbam did not bother to implement moving ffb center point with trim, I managed to remedy this 
V:package: 
RHINO #0081 Has Shipped!
RHINO #0081 Has Shipped!
VCool...
But this will be configurable on aircraft bases?
But this will be configurable on aircraft bases?
WWhat do you mean?
It should work on any aircraft including the upcoming F-15, if they don't implement it there too.
The way it works is I take virtual cockpit stick position, real physical stick position, do some math and send back adjusted input x,y values back to DCS. This way real stick (Rhino) is offset from center (trimmed), but DCS thinks it's at center.
It should work on any aircraft including the upcoming F-15, if they don't implement it there too.
The way it works is I take virtual cockpit stick position, real physical stick position, do some math and send back adjusted input x,y values back to DCS. This way real stick (Rhino) is offset from center (trimmed), but DCS thinks it's at center.
VI mean if i want to use on the harrier but not on other aircraft which has proper trim implementation
WAh, yes ofcourse
VSo something that depending on the module can switch options or profiles on the fly
WIt's the same telemFFB based config.ini
KGreat news Walmis. I can't wait to try it, as I fly the harrier with VMA513! Is this available in a new version of telemFFB soon?
WYeah, need to clean up the code a bit before releasing
KUnderstood. Thank you for all your work on this!
IAwesome! Any chance we can use this to fix the forward stick on the f14 and f5?
MThey’re both meant to be quite forward
MTry the 29 too
LIf I read correctly what W wrote: once he releases next TelemFFB version you will specify in its config.ini file which aircraft you want to use it for. All the other modules are unaffected and you'll never have to touch the file again. It's probably just a line of plain text like override_DCS_input = YES (not the actual line) which you add under [AV-8B]. If you need the same for any other module, you just add the same line under [the other a/c handle].
WIt's a bit more involved. We need to also find the arguments for the stick position and export them with the telemetry packet for each aircraft separately in the LUA file as StickX and StickY (pedals will be added too in the future)
ZSo the Rhino trim is proxied to DCS. Very very cool.
Jhttps://www.reddit.com/r/ValveIndex/comments/12pxkdv/the_facepalm_macro_keyboard/ new way to salute when catapulting off carriers if you have an index 
TYet to set it up - waiting for dualock to arrive tomorrow - powered up and connected and all seems to work as advertised in the manual.
LThis is awesome
PNah that looks like the Virpil Russian grip, basically the same as the VKB version
P
P
Pplus the Rhino's gimbal/grip connection is another ~130mm
PSo it's about 565mm from the top of the Rhino base to the top of the grip
Dyes, this is mongoose stick looks like CM2
TYes the new Virpil CM2 withe their 200mm extension.
TI will measure tomorrow - 70cm from floor to top of stick
PI run a similar configuration with Virpil:
Rhino+10cm extension + 20cm curved extension
Even with such config the DCS Mosquito is still untameable. Waiting on Walmis to introduce the axis sensitivity/curve in the vpforce app, since using DCS curves on FFB axis is borked.
Rhino+10cm extension + 20cm curved extension
Even with such config the DCS Mosquito is still untameable. Waiting on Walmis to introduce the axis sensitivity/curve in the vpforce app, since using DCS curves on FFB axis is borked.
IBeing able to add some curves would be greatly appreciated
MThe mozzie is definitely finicky to get the crosshairs on target but it flies well. One day it will hopefully just click for you
PMosquito is just too sensitive with a stick. I have to use a curve of 50 in DCS (without FFB) to fly it comfortably, it allows for much better guns control, and overall is pleasant. Without curves it's like 1mm up and it's stalling, 1mm down and it's diving...
MThat was my initial impression, yes
I got a little more into constantly trimming for starters
And I think my brain just got used to moving the stick by tickle only
I'm quite happy in it now and I've had some fun dogfighting it on the 4ya server too when an a8 shows up and thinks he can turnfight it
I got a little more into constantly trimming for starters
And I think my brain just got used to moving the stick by tickle only
I'm quite happy in it now and I've had some fun dogfighting it on the 4ya server too when an a8 shows up and thinks he can turnfight it
Pi get it, but what's the point of having an FFB if all you do is tickle it? 
MIf you're turning in it the ffb helps
To be honest I think we just need stronger motors to make it better
To be honest I think we just need stronger motors to make it better
PYeah... Rhino's motor strength is perfect with 10cm extension, with the innate gimbal's height it's at ~23cm total + grip, at least to me. With the additional 20cm I added = yes, motors could be 30% stronger, but frankly I already got used to the current strength, so it doesn't bother me too much if at all....