LWe are working on it, but there is still a lot to do and it isnt documented at all yet
RNo worries mate, cheers. Be great to get a better solution than XPForce.
LIf you know a bit of python you can try it out on the wip branch on github. Most effects are missing. I have implemented engine rpm rumble, but it is not on the branch yet
RIs a trim solution implemented? I'll take a look 
IQuestion about directinput ffb and dcs. Does dcs command an exact amount of force to the stick based on what a pilot would experience in the real plane? Could you simulate this exactly if the length of the stick, motors etc was known? The master gain functionality on the stick works great, but a bit confused om how to get the most realistic result.
MYou’d need bloody strong motors
MThe current iteration just gives you an indication
Some stick forces are massive
Some stick forces are massive
IFor the highest forces yes, but for most use cases (normal flying) surely the Rhino covers it. Maxing forces / gain makes normal flying really tough.
MIt’s almost too gentle in the middle for some planes I feel
MLike the spitty and mozzie are still very wobbly
MThe flying is never hard though
MI think it just teaches you the be a bit less extreme
MThe only two you yank to the limit is the hornet and the m2k as they are fbw
MAnd maybe the 109 if you didn’t trim in the turn
MEvery other plane just is a gentle pull well within the axis limits (until you’re slow)
II guess this is my question. Does dcs tell directinput that it wants exactly x amount of force in some direction and how does this translate to the stick which has all sorts of force multiplyer config?
ISince the rhino knows its motor size, gear ratios and ~ stick length could it just not provide the exact force that dcs wants? Maybe this is what it is doing and I am misunderstanding how the config tool works 
MUmm I don’t really get the question.
I think dcs just says. Hey I’m this scenario apply 35 percent spring force on the x axis. And a p effect that shakes the stick too at 45 percent force.
You as the user decide in dcs to set the gain of those forces on the stick
And you also get to change the gain in Walmis program
I think dcs just says. Hey I’m this scenario apply 35 percent spring force on the x axis. And a p effect that shakes the stick too at 45 percent force.
You as the user decide in dcs to set the gain of those forces on the stick
And you also get to change the gain in Walmis program
MGenerally I try to use as much force as I can without overheating the stick during a sweaty dogfight
MIf I had bigger motors I’d get them to apply more force
P24nm build coming up? 
MIf I had obscenely big motors then I’d start looking at the natops or something to find the max stick forces
MLike isn’t it like 25kg for the tomcat?
Pall I want is for the extension to bend when flying a warbird in a dogfight ok?
MAnd the m2k elastic pull is like 50kg?
MMaybe in 2027
Pso what's the state of MSFS integration lately?
PI've been so busy enjoying DCS that I completely forgot I even have MSFS
Pah, thanks. Alright, DCS it is then ^^
Pyep, tho msfs support is getting closer
DYou want to simulate real pilot fatigue?
MActually yea lol
MWould actually make the m2k flight model fun
PHey m8, who was the guy that was making the Ya & Lagg spade grips that went awol
DReplika
Pcheers m8
DThis was the last correspondence I had with him via PM
DHaven’t heard from him since
Pdam it wtf he have to go do that for
LNot a Virpil desk mount but the geometry and the extension is almost the same. My feedback: you probably need less throw than you think. I have found it is more important to sit closer to the desk and be able to reach everything in the front panel which you also have in your design. I've got Cougar MFDs on the edge of the table. I can reach those comfortably too. It's not just the throw, it's the overall ergonomics. I have a throw limiter plate with 18° / 12° angles and the physical stick moves a lot further than the virtual one does in DCS. I fly both 
and 
.
and .
IThat is my question. Does DCS ask directinput for 35 percent (of max) or say 5 n of force? I would think that if you wanted to simulate something as accurate as possible the latter would be best.
NThanks for the feedback. Yeah, I don't imagine the full 22 degrees would (ever) be required..but didn't want to limit myself too much. I think the CM3 I am currently using is only +/- 15 or so
MJust a percentage I’d say
NWhile I hope to build this out of aluminum at some point.. I think my first iteration is going to be plywood, a 2x4 and some adjustable furniture legs from Amazon
N
VNothing wrong with that! If you really want a metal one don't make it too fancy with birch plywood and stain or you'll lose all motivation to upgrade it once it's beautiful and works perfectly!
Ihttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/desktop/ee417675(v=vs.85) Seems like you are correct, but directinput returns the actual force applied so I guess that could be used by the developer to adjust for the exact force experienced by the pilot.
WMy setup is about 24Nm. But you lose so much with extensions. I'm about 400mm from pivot point and currently need ~7kg of force at full deflection. I'm considering a 5:1 gearbox on the 86BLF04 motors (along with the pulley setup) which would double that. Realistically I don't think I can go much further though, not without larger motors, which aren't available. And then the VPForce board wouldn't be able to drive the extra current they would draw either.
Pyeah right, I have the Rhino & a 200mm vkb extension & use the mcgu which I can feel the difference compared to when I use the extremely light kg12 v2 grip, although with the kg12 grip & full gain, spring etc. I do get a decent amount of force, I think a 24Nm build would suffice for me. Maybe in the future if Walmis can intergrate some of those crazy pankacke motors for e-scooters etc. then a build with irl stick forces would be an idea I'd def look into.