Why do these 2 exists at the same time?
Why do these 2 exists at the same time?
BClearly there is some significat difference for different use cases
HThey are merging them slowly
BDo you know anything about that?
HFunctions works with Pages, and Workers get the newest features
HThat's the main difference
Bthanks alot
Bdo you recommend the worker AI over gpt for just summarazing and generating?
Boh sh * it that is off topic, apologies
CIt would get cancelled yea. You can use waitUntil with the promise which will let the promise run without blocking the response: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/handlers/fetch/#contextwaituntil
Incoming HTTP requests to a Worker are passed to the fetch() handler as a request object. To respond to the request with a response, return a Response …
Cdoesn't look like it, no, you don't get passed context, maybe some way to hack it but I'm not too familiar with Pages Plugins, but it lets you return either a Response or a Promise<Response>. If you're doing anything like submitting the data, you should really await it so the user knows the form request really did go through
JAnyone know why I'm getting 512 "Could not send your email." with the Mailchannels plugin? I believe I have my DNS record setup properly for the lockdown thing, it points to the subdomain in the "Pages & Workers Overview" on the right
CYou might want to reconsider mailchannels: workers-and-pages-discussions
Regardless, it needs to be your pages.dev (even if using a custom domain, has to be the pages.dev of your project), it corresponds with the cf-worker header. ex: cfid=myproject.pages.dev
Regardless, it needs to be your pages.dev (even if using a custom domain, has to be the pages.dev of your project), it corresponds with the cf-worker header. ex: cfid=myproject.pages.dev
JAh, figured. I don't think any of that is relevant if we have lockdown/SPF/DKIM though, right?
JJust wanted a simple webform 
DHi, looking for some help with functions to help me fetch json data from a third party API.
Apologies in advanced if I have got this all wrong, I am usually just front-end but I am helping this animal rescue organisation make their webpage - and to list the animals they have for adoption we are using a third party api that needs a API secret. To hide the API secret from the client-end I went about making an express.js backend that will be hosted and the end points will simply just call the
third party API with the secret, and some basic filtering queries will just be appeneded to the fetch.
As this is just a simple 'backend' I believe it would be best suited for serverless functions like on Cloudflare Pages Functions as I have migrated the static page to be hosted on Cloudflare Pages already. Would this implementation be possible in CloudFlare Pages functions. I tried looking through documentation and attempted to implement last night, would the basic functions act the same with a getRequest. I had issues with parsing the request for the queries as well as returning a proper response. An example query would be ".../listings?page=1&species=Cat"
If anyone has any examples they could point me to or any guidance I would greatly appreciate it.
Attached is an example endpoint for the express implementation.
Apologies in advanced if I have got this all wrong, I am usually just front-end but I am helping this animal rescue organisation make their webpage - and to list the animals they have for adoption we are using a third party api that needs a API secret. To hide the API secret from the client-end I went about making an express.js backend that will be hosted and the end points will simply just call the
third party API with the secret, and some basic filtering queries will just be appeneded to the fetch.
As this is just a simple 'backend' I believe it would be best suited for serverless functions like on Cloudflare Pages Functions as I have migrated the static page to be hosted on Cloudflare Pages already. Would this implementation be possible in CloudFlare Pages functions. I tried looking through documentation and attempted to implement last night, would the basic functions act the same with a getRequest. I had issues with parsing the request for the queries as well as returning a proper response. An example query would be ".../listings?page=1&species=Cat"
If anyone has any examples they could point me to or any guidance I would greatly appreciate it.
Attached is an example endpoint for the express implementation.
AAny plans to not bundle all functions into one worker and have a worker per function file? I understood that this is the case, but just learned recently that it is not. I really wish it would be a worker per function :/
KNot that I'm aware of - Workers (and Pages frameworks) projects become a single bundled Worker.
AYes, but it would be great if that could change in the future.
AGetting the size limits per function file instead of the bundle
ABeing able to fine-tune each worker seperatly
ABecause if they get bundled, what are the actual benefits of using multiple files in functions folder over a single _workers file?
HA file-based router, that you don't have to configure manually?
AThat does my framework already, I'm just trying to understand some pros/cons here
HYou can also use Functions plugins, without having to rewrite them to match whatever system your framework uses
HBut yeah, from the perspective of a Framework author, I would generally go with a
_worker.jsThanks! That helps a lot.
AWe @Astro would love to see those functions being seperate workers, but yeah maybe a dream for a future update
HIs this to get around size limits, or just to solidify the limits per file?
AMultiple reasons, size limits, custom config per page/route, separate api endpoints & frontend pages, better analytics, etc.
HI do actually have an idea for how that could work, but it might make Pages more expensive
GI am using pages functions where my frontend react app (made with pages) talks to the server side in the functions. Although, this is working, but it is throwing the following message.
"Your worker created multiple branches of a single stream (for instance, by calling
I am not calling
"Your worker created multiple branches of a single stream (for instance, by calling
response.clone()request.clone()new Response(response.body, response)new Request(request)I am not calling
response.clone()request.clone()
GThank you! It worked!
Mgetting this error when trying to establish a logging session for a pages function on a preview deployment
TX-Forwarded-For gets appending when using functions:
I have a simple function attached to my page that runs fetch(). I use the request.headers.get("CF-Connecting-IP") to get the IP of the original requestor and get the 'X-Forwarded-For' header to that IP address. However, when the request goes out, the header is:
X-Forwarded-For: User-Ip, Cloudflare-IP
Where the IP of (I think) CF-Pages gets added to the X-Forwarded. This seems like odd behavior. While technically I believe the path is User -> CF Pages -> CF Function -> fetch-Request It seems this isn't really a double proxy with two Forwards as the CF Pages->CF Function I think should be transparent. In any case, is there a way to get a function in CF-Pages make a fetch with just the user's IP in the X-Forwarded-For header? If I don't manually add that header, CF sets the X-Forwarded-For header to just the Cloudfare-IP.
I have a simple function attached to my page that runs fetch(). I use the request.headers.get("CF-Connecting-IP") to get the IP of the original requestor and get the 'X-Forwarded-For' header to that IP address. However, when the request goes out, the header is:
X-Forwarded-For: User-Ip, Cloudflare-IP
Where the IP of (I think) CF-Pages gets added to the X-Forwarded. This seems like odd behavior. While technically I believe the path is User -> CF Pages -> CF Function -> fetch-Request It seems this isn't really a double proxy with two Forwards as the CF Pages->CF Function I think should be transparent. In any case, is there a way to get a function in CF-Pages make a fetch with just the user's IP in the X-Forwarded-For header? If I don't manually add that header, CF sets the X-Forwarded-For header to just the Cloudfare-IP.
RCreating a simple link shortener with D1 and pages functions. Is there a way to programmatically create a cache rule once a shortened link is created? So subsequent requests to /myfunction/:id will return the cached 301 result instead of having to hit my D1 db and worker?
HYes to number one, don’t have any Functions on the route for number two
IAre routes.json auto-constructed now?
II thought you used to need to use a routes.json
EThey are if you use /functions and have been for a long while (probably as long as theyve been a thing?)
You only need a custom one if youre doing something weird or are using a _worker.js
You only need a custom one if youre doing something weird or are using a _worker.js
PGreetings and salutations. I have a question about moving a Workers project in TypeScript over to Functions using advanced mode (with a _worker.js). I've written my application in the module syntax (as the docs instructed), but when I compile my TypeScript into _worker.js with tsc, in the output directory (which should be /build, as far as I can tell), the Pages project fails to deploy. I've tried using different options for "module" in the tsconfig.json as well, such as "amd" and "system", because "esnext" doesn't let me use the "outFile" option.
My question is: does all the code for a Function need to be compiled into a single _worker.js, or can each TypeScript file be compiled separately, and then the _worker.js will know to import from the other JavaScript files? Or would it be better to just give up on trying to migrate the Worker, and rebuild the application in the /functions folder instead?
My question is: does all the code for a Function need to be compiled into a single _worker.js, or can each TypeScript file be compiled separately, and then the _worker.js will know to import from the other JavaScript files? Or would it be better to just give up on trying to migrate the Worker, and rebuild the application in the /functions folder instead?
HYou can have a
_worker.jswranglerYou don't need to run
tsc