That, or just never pass a request back to your origin unless it is **you** making a DB request
That, or just never pass a request back to your origin unless it is you making a DB request
.And how would I make sure it was my worker
.Also, is it not very optimal to just have an authorisation header?
HYou could use a Tunnel, and then not expose the server at all
HYou can, but with this method, you literally can't hit the origin at all(barring any issues on CF's side), while with the Auth Header method, a bad actor can still hammer your DB with requests, even if they aren't authorized
.I’m a bit lost with the last part there. I only actually make the db update if the auth headers value is that “random string”, so it won’t do anything if it’s not right
.Is there any docs/examples on tunnelling?
HYes, but in this case, if I want to take your DB out of commision, I can just send random requests to your server. The changes won't be able to be applied, but because your server is busy handling my requests, it won't have time to handle your valid changes
HFollow this step-by-step guide to get your first tunnel up and running using Zero Trust.
.But that would be an express like thing, right? Rather then a db thing. Because it’s just busy not doing anything but handling the wrong requests
.So it would be better to return wrong requests from my cf worker where everything goes through anyway?
HYes, because no matter how beefy your server is, Workers will be able to burst to much higher capacity than Express
.Doing nothing*
.Gotcha
.Thanks so much, was really helpful 
.Just to confirm, I can still use the auth header method, right? Just instead using the worker to say yes or no
HYeah, you could
.Awesome, thanks
.Is there an npm package or something similar for how to type the context param here
.nvm got it
KTry
zone_name instead.
Mhi there, i've deployed my worker, and when i try to access it i get this error
Mbut when i run it locally
Mit works fine
Manyone know why?
KMalright
Mi added it
Mbut i still get that vague error
Mthis is how i've added it
M
Dhow to enable env.unsafe in cf workers?
JThis? https://github.com/cloudflare/workerd/pull/1338
As of right now, it’s internal and workerd only
As of right now, it’s internal and workerd only
Cis it possible to invoke context.waitUntil multiple times?
HYes
AIf anyone is interested I did a write up on how you can get .NET/C# code running on a worker
https://andrews.substack.com/p/bringing-net-to-the-edge-how-to-run
https://andrews.substack.com/p/bringing-net-to-the-edge-how-to-run
A Walkthrough of Adapting Complex .NET CLI Applications for Cloudflare Workers and the Browser Using WASI
H#cloudflare-ai probably
I?channel-crossposting
FPlease do not post your question in multiple channels per the rules at #
welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.
welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.II'm going to delete your question here and in #workers-for-platforms as it's already in one of the AI channels
CHello guys, is it possible to create a custom access link to a specific file via cloudflare cdn api? I have been looking through the documentation all day but I don t seem to find my answer. A little direction would be greatly appreciated!
HYou would have to expose that file somehow. Cloudflare doesn’t provide any ootb file lockers
HAs in, you could build one with R2 and then slap Access on top
CThanks for the suggestions, will look into them now
Cwhat about token based file access? would that be a possibility?
