I'd hope so, at least - mostly because we have the concrete evidence right there in the failed build
I'd hope so, at least - mostly because we have the concrete evidence right there in the failed builds. I think I saw 3 different critical breakages Arch would have ingested in regular updates, and I imagine the glibc (library?) update would cause long-term issues for Debian/Ubuntu as apps update beyond system packages. Here, all three hit, and just.. never reached users, and we stay on the last stable update for a few days/weeks until a stable one builds successfully
