Before I switched to Bazzite I used OpenSUSE Tumbleweed for quite awhile but this would always pop up whenever my kernel or other system package was upgraded but I hope this isn't the case with all rpm based distros.
I have heard that they are "Testing the waters" with the new flatpak version and that it is "Not Approved" by them yet because of some security thing in Chromium based browsers. Is it stable and secure?
It's at least as secure as every other chromium-based-browser-flatpak since they all rely on the patches developed by one person (refi64, Ryan Gonzalez) who also maintains several of the flatpaks. According to him, theoretically there may be edge cases in the chromium sandbox where it's adapted to make flatpak sandbox calls, but those edge cases should be low risk. None of the other contributors to any of those projects has found any edge cases or security holes. The Vivaldi flatpak should be roughly as stable as all other packages, or a bit more so
I've had issues with this flag before, but after my main monitor died, I had issues with Vivaldi on my laptop's internal screen, turned it on, and no longer had issues
KDE has extension for Google Chrome / Chromium to provide integration with Plasma (and partly XFCE) desktop (Media playback, file downloads, KDE Connect etc). It's called Plasma Browser Integra...
Yeah on TW every time my kernel updated the problem would happen and it would only go away when Vivaldi updated, no Nvidia Driver updates ever fixed it nor did any further kernel fix it either
I hadn't known/remembered CachyOS, so I initially thought it might use an older kernel, but it seems to use roughly the latest kernel version, but with various modifications under the hood
Maybe I should embrace the Flatpak version from now on and see how that goes, if can remember to I can try out the different browsers to see if they have the plasma browser integration problem or not tomorrow after I finish up high school for the day.