I love AI art. I feel like people railing against are the same people that would have complained abo
I love AI art. I feel like people railing against are the same people that would have complained about cars putting stableboys out of work.
Aa 15 seconds animation can turn into a 300$ project, ai is the best way to make it cost effective
KBesides, what's the functional difference on training an AI on the styles of other artists vs a human doing it, apart from the AI being faster? That's where that argument kind of falls apart for me. If I personally practice drawing like other artists, and mix those styles to make something, it's somehow fine, but if I write a program to do it, it's suddenly the devil. I feel like most of the arguments against AI generated art are emotional, not logical or reasonable.
KArt will just become like luxury cars and hand crafted furniture. Low to mid range will be automated, high end will command high end prices and be a luxury. Can't put the genie back in the bottle, after all.
C@Kyle Gospo I have translated the new stuff and added the new secure boot section, however when I'm doing a PR to merge the changes, GitHub wants to PR other older commits that have been already been merged
CHow can I make it so it ignores al previous commits and only sends the newest one?
CArtists complains about AI because is taking the personal styles of thousands of artists without any retribution, stealing potential customers and ruining the livelyhood of thousands
CWhen you learn to draw, you develop your own drawing style, something that took hundreds if not thousands of hours to perfect, yeah, you can try and mimic the style of somebody else (rocko edits comes at the top of my head), but again, is somebody that spent a lot of time to perfect, specially if you ask for permission, and you do it as a tribute, that's okay
KSure, but 1) any human could do the same, and 2) this happens with every disruptive new technology. No one needs Ice vendors now that home refrigerators exist, either.
CWhat's not okay, is big corpos stealing the personal style of thousands of artists without them even knowing, nor giving permission
CI mean, if we take that argument and expand it, what even are we doing here, collaborating to this project? Just let copilot do all the programming, and an AI to translate everything
Awe are using the basic creative skills we have to make something, its not about stealing money from artists, we are the artists here, if we had to commission these kind of stuff not only will takes months, will probably costs a lot for a free opensource project
CThat would take out the passion of everything we do, just because we are "slow and expensive"
KThat's still an emotional argument, and doesn't reflect the reality that this tech exists and isn't going to magically vanish. There's a reason SAG-AFTA had to agree to allow AI generated actors, voices, etc, in the latest agreements that ended the strike that industry was having. It's just plain not going to vanish. All this effort spent railing against it existing at all would be better spent figuring out how to transition things to the new reality that creative industries will have to live with.
CAnd that's a world I don't want to live in
Arei made the logo for bazzite, didnt get paid, they took a couple of hours to make it, its all a community effort
KI do art for a living. AI generation has sped up my workflow so much.
KI'll send you some instructions as soon as I can
CCorrect! They decided that the logo was ugly, and needed a redesign, and so, they used their own time and expertise to design the branding we all agree is great
K@Kyle Gospo Do I need to be concerned about the big ol
SecAdvisories: 1Is a passion project, using AI is not suitable for a passion and colaborative project
CIf we decide to just ignore the emotional arguments, we would become an empty husk, leaving aside humanity will only bring us to our doom
Afor an animation is justified, i dont think kyle or jorge want to pay 100+ for each image inside the gif and another 300+ for the animation, we are trying to make the job easier here
CI'll apreciate it 
KI feel you're being hyperbolic, but I think we'll just have to agree to disagree here.
CNo, but we could wait for somebody with the right set of skills that wishes to contribute because of their own passion
Ai dont think someone wants to make such huge thing for free
Ai am waiting crush response and i will try to make one myself with the original images of the gif and the official logo
CNobody in their right mind would like to spend hundreds of hours collaborating for free to make Bazzite a great OCI based OS... unless there's passion, interest, just saying
KThey'll come and go, anything critical we'll handle
KOkay, thanks for the info, I just got worried with the big red text
K
Iyea, and I think that would be great as well. coming up with the promps and tweaking things can also be a bit of an art IMO. all the AI hype has been BS in my opionion its just the new hot thing since crypto fell off the map. where I do find it interesting is use as a tool. Even in coding. saying that AI is going to code an entire application - anyone that says that is kidding themselves. but using "AI" to speed up the workflow of developers that is interesting to me. hell even the term I hate, its just ML rebranded. all the hype, fud and bs around it annoys me and frankly misses the whole point.
Adude, i understand what you mean, but its rare that a full ass artist will make it, leave it to us, ai is fine, its not hurting you, and the quality from a real artist is noticeable anyway, the gif images are fine, i wanna use those, they dont have to be 8k res, 3k ppi
JI commissioned all the artwork in bluefin from active paleoartists.
KMy favorite is when I ask GPT for code, it answers with incorrect code with non-existing functions, I point that out, and it apologies and does it again
Iand if I had the time to play around with some of the AI art stuff I find it cool I could maybe ask the computer to make some graphic for me that I can envision in my head but dont have the skills for. now I could just make a really bitchin color crayon drawing of what im thinking of. that would be good.
Aif you would be down to pay the same for an animation is up to you, but imo having it made for free its fine
Ithis, so much this...
NI love the non-existent ansible modules it will spit out 
KBillion dollar gaslighting simulator
KMy workflow for stuff that needs speed over accuracy is: Sketch image -> AI generate 30 or 40 images using prompts based on my image -> Pick the best -> manually edit and touch up image -> done. It speeds things up massively for me.
Ktakes far less time than drawing and coloring entirely manually.
Athats basically what we are trying to do
Abut its an animation
Ithe halucinations are great, and i particularly like the stuff people have come up with to poison the models and cause them to hallucinate, its a facinating arms race to watch. but also frustrating because imagine what we could accomplish if we put the energy going into this into something productive. but alas...
NI don't think people realize how much work it takes to go through that many images, pick the best one and make changes.
Iall I know is I want them all to get off my lawn
KIt takes less time than me manually drawing and coloring the whole thing.
CUsing AI as an aid is the bees knees, like making a TLDR of a long article which I don't have the time to fully read, take out the important points of a presentation to make it more digestable, heck, I have used AI to give me ideas in how to furnish my living room, asking AI to make a picture based in your description and use it as an inspiration is great, is all good, but to use it just to avoid paying people that have dedicated their entire lifes to the craft, it irks me
