so what if a client is hosting their domain on cloudflar managing their dns, will it create an issue

R

robOP•2/2/24, 9:48 PM

Do i want it proxied or not ? if i was a hypothetical customer ?

R

robOP•2/2/24, 9:53 PM

trackflow.cosmic.marketing redirected you too many times.
Try deleting your cookies.
ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS

trackflow.cosmic.marketing redirected you too many times.
Try deleting your cookies.
ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS

trackflow.cosmic.marketing redirected you too many times.
Try deleting your cookies.
ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS

trackflow.cosmic.marketing redirected you too many times.
Try deleting your cookies.
ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS

R

robOP•2/2/24, 9:53 PM

It's in our custom hostnames so it should be working

R

robOP•2/3/24, 5:06 AM

@tony

Rrob so what if a client is hosting their domain on cloudflar managing their dns, wil...

P

Payello•2/3/24, 5:42 PM

It should not be proxied on the customer's DNS settings, but the hostname they point to should be proxied in your platform's DNS settings.
You should also add a suitable route to your worker. When Cloudflare for SaaS is enabled on a zone you are allowed to use the wildcard

for the worker route which catches all custom hostnames.

Original message was deleted

A

arfath_linklet•2/11/24, 2:25 PM

Hey all! A followup query - The 5000 limit for max hostname - can the limit be increased by support for non-enterprise accounts?

O

Oleg Isonen•2/14/24, 3:10 PM

Hey, is tiered cache on workers for platforms still not workig with R2? Anybody knows the reason?

We just figured out that our site LITERALLY fails core web vitals because the blocking CSS resource is globally super slow, which we serve from R2.

https://webstudio.is/

Looks great on lighthouse score https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwebstudio.is%2F

But completely fails core web vitals.

My tests have shown 300-500ms loading times specifically for the static ressources and in particular important one the blocking CSS resource https://webstudio.is/build/_assets/index-6JJ5GLFW.css

Webstudio

Open visual development for the open web

Similar to Webflow, Webstudio visually translates CSS without obscuring it, giving designers superpowers that were exclusive to developers in the past.

OOleg Isonen Hey, is tiered cache on workers for platforms still not workig with R2? Anybody ...

U

Unsmart•2/14/24, 5:06 PM

R2 doesnt support tiered cache doesnt have anything to do with workers for platforms. I imagine they will eventually work on getting tiered cache support but might be a while

L

ldp•2/24/24, 8:55 PM

TLDR:

new ReadableStream()

new ReadableStream()

new ReadableStream()

new ReadableStream() is working for me in normal workers, but not workers for platforms

Hi guys! I'm implementing a feature using Prisma's Pulse product, which streams database change events to listening clients.

I'm able to connect and listen to events perfectly on a traditional worker, but the same code on Workers for Platforms as a customer worker has issues when instantiating a ReadableStream.

Error: To use the new ReadableStream() constructor, enable the streams_enable_constructors compatibility flag. Refer to the docs for more information: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/compatibility-dates/#compatibility-flags

I was hoping it would be as simple as:

compatibility_flags = ['streams_enable_constructors']

compatibility_flags = ['streams_enable_constructors']

compatibility_flags = ['streams_enable_constructors']

compatibility_flags = ['streams_enable_constructors']

When attempting to add this to my WFP

wrangler.toml

wrangler.toml

, I get the following error:

The compatibility flag streams_enable_constructors became the default as of 2022-11-30 so does not need to be specified anymore. [code: 10021]

Current compatibility date (for both platform code, and customer workers):

compatibility_date = "2024-02-21"

compatibility_date = "2024-02-21"

compatibility_date = "2024-02-21"

compatibility_date = "2024-02-21"

I'm guessing maybe I need to set this in my customer code somehow?

Is there potentially some sort of binding I can set to enable this for my customers?

My other suspicion is that it may be a different error, but cloudflare potentially catches it and throws this generic error instead.

Zzeb Yes, either by using the secrets endpoint similar to whats available to other ty...

A

Abdallah Abis•2/27/24, 10:02 PM

Thanks for this!!
How can I delete a secret? what's the endpoint?

U

Unsmart•2/27/24, 10:06 PM

a DELETE to /secrets/:name

UUnsmart a DELETE to /secrets/:name

A

Abdallah Abis•2/27/24, 10:20 PM

I have added

{
  "name": "Example",
  "text":  "example",
  "type": "secret_text"
}

{
  "name": "Example",
  "text":  "example",
  "type": "secret_text"
}

{
  "name": "Example",
  "text":  "example",
  "type": "secret_text"
}

{
  "name": "Example",
  "text":  "example",
  "type": "secret_text"
}

I tried

DELETE

DELETE

DELETE

DELETE to

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/{account_id}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/{namespace}/scripts/{script_name}/secrets/Example

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/{account_id}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/{namespace}/scripts/{script_name}/secrets/Example

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/{account_id}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/{namespace}/scripts/{script_name}/secrets/Example

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/{account_id}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/{namespace}/scripts/{script_name}/secrets/Example

I get

{
    "result": null,
    "success": false,
    "errors": [
        {
            "code": 10013,
            "message": "workers.api.error.unknown"
        }
    ],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": null,
    "success": false,
    "errors": [
        {
            "code": 10013,
            "message": "workers.api.error.unknown"
        }
    ],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": null,
    "success": false,
    "errors": [
        {
            "code": 10013,
            "message": "workers.api.error.unknown"
        }
    ],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": null,
    "success": false,
    "errors": [
        {
            "code": 10013,
            "message": "workers.api.error.unknown"
        }
    ],
    "messages": []
}

but trying with a secret key that doesn't exist like

ExampleX

ExampleX

ExampleX

ExampleX
returns

{
  "code": 10056,
  "message": "workers.api.error.binding_not_found"
}

{
  "code": 10056,
  "message": "workers.api.error.binding_not_found"
}

{
  "code": 10056,
  "message": "workers.api.error.binding_not_found"
}

{
  "code": 10056,
  "message": "workers.api.error.binding_not_found"
}

So the endpoint is there I guess but doesn't work for some reason

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/1/24, 5:20 PM

Here's a sample curl for deleting secrets:

curl --location --request DELETE 'https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<ACCOUNT>/workers/scripts/worker-restless-wave-3410/secrets/my-secret' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>'

curl --location --request DELETE 'https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<ACCOUNT>/workers/scripts/worker-restless-wave-3410/secrets/my-secret' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>'

curl --location --request DELETE 'https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<ACCOUNT>/workers/scripts/worker-restless-wave-3410/secrets/my-secret' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>'

curl --location --request DELETE 'https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<ACCOUNT>/workers/scripts/worker-restless-wave-3410/secrets/my-secret' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>'

MMaddy | Technical Writer Hey everybody! My name's Maddy and I'm the tech writer for Workers for Platforms...

U

Unsmart•3/4/24, 4:31 PM

Not workers for platforms directly but its pretty common for people to want to use custom domains + workers for platforms and the documentation for how to use workers as an origin is not correct/clear. Put in an issue about this on github a little over a year ago: https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/issues/5584

Also seems the link changed its here now: https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-for-platforms/cloudflare-for-saas/start/advanced-settings/worker-as-origin/

M

Matt Linkous•3/5/24, 10:04 PM

Am I mistaken that even with workers-for-platforms there's not a way to get Durable Object storage by tenant/namespace?

A

Abdallah Abis•3/6/24, 9:37 PM

Hey Folks,
Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure it?
using this configures the user worker as a producer, but not a consumer.

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

MMatt Linkous Am I mistaken that even with workers-for-platforms there's not a way to get Dura...

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 6:17 PM

What do you mean by tenant in this case? Do you mean per-user worker?

U

Unsmart•3/7/24, 6:25 PM

My assumption was he wants users to be able to create their own DOs in a workers for platform script. Thats really the only thing you cant do with them per tenant. Would be pretty neat to be able to do

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 6:29 PM

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fxuUbZLFlkrDyfM2VTTFZFwDaBtodjCAR1neM3UL714/edit?usp=sharing

Google Docs

[EXTERNAL] Durable Objects in namespaced scripts

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 6:30 PM

D

DaniFoldi•3/7/24, 6:30 PM

oh wow that's now a thing

U

Unsmart•3/7/24, 6:54 PM

:PauseChamp:

U

Unsmart•3/7/24, 6:55 PM

This is huge

Ttanushree │ Workers PM What do you mean by tenant in this case? Do you mean per-user worker?

M

Matt Linkous•3/7/24, 7:50 PM

Yeah exactly. Each of our "tenants" will have exactly one user worker that is a durable object and it doesn't seem possible to calculate their individually used storage

MMatt Linkous Yeah exactly. Each of our "tenants" will have exactly one user worker that is a ...

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 8:34 PM

Ideally you're able to use script name or assign unique class names and then filer by that in our GraphQL analytics. Doesn't look like we expose anything more granular than total account storage right now though.

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 8:34 PM

Passing this feedback on to the DO PM

Ttanushree │ Workers PM Passing this feedback on to the DO PM

M

Matt Linkous•3/7/24, 8:37 PM

Thanks! That would be helpful. We do have a unique class name per DO but as far as I can tell that still doesn't allow us to calculate storage per DO

MMatt Linkous Thanks! That would be helpful. We do have a unique class name per DO but as far ...

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 8:55 PM

I hear that this is coming in Q2. It's been highly requested

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/7/24, 8:57 PM

Question for this group — would you be interesting in sharing you’ve built or are building with WFP

We’re gearing up to release WFP down plan. So far it’s been restricted to enterprise customers + special access to our discord community. You all are so creative and I was hoping to highlight ways our community is using WFP!

Putting a feeler out there for how many of you would be interested. Can you react to this messaging if its something you would be up for

A

Abdallah Abis•3/13/24, 9:09 PM

Hey Folks,
Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure it?
using this configures the user worker as a producer, but not a consumer.

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

AAbdallah Abis Hey Folks, Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure...

T

tanushree │ Workers PM•3/14/24, 8:21 PM

Asking internally. Wil follow up!

AAbdallah Abis Hey Folks, Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure...

A

Acе•3/15/24, 9:35 AM

It is not possible. Queue consumers are actually setup by wrangler during deploy. You can only use a regular worker. Maybe tanushree has some other options for you though

R

rook•3/17/24, 4:25 PM

hi, with WFP is it possible to place a worker in a fixed location? outside of using smart placement.

R

rook•3/17/24, 6:26 PM

i know you can pick the location for vercel edge functions and iirc they are built on workers.

U

Unsmart•3/17/24, 6:27 PM

You cannot, vercel doesnt route to cloudflare first they route to their AWS servers so they will just route to the region they want on AWS then call cloudflare

R

rook•3/17/24, 6:44 PM

are there plans to enable this? workers would be so good if picking a location was possible. right now it's so slow to call a db or api, if you aren't close to them already. smart placement does not fix this.

Rrook are there plans to enable this? workers would be so good if picking a location w...

C

Chaika•3/17/24, 6:48 PM

why doesn't smart placement fix that?
Probably should move to #workers-discussions
You can create a D1 db in a specific region and bind your worker to it, enable smart placement, and it'll always run close

CChaika why doesn't smart placement fix that? Probably should move to #workers-discussio...

R

rook•3/17/24, 6:59 PM

moved it there

Ttanushree │ Workers PM Asking internally. Wil follow up!

A

Abdallah Abis•3/19/24, 4:49 PM

Thanks @tanushree │ Workers PM !
Any updates?

L

Luke•3/20/24, 11:20 AM

Hi everyone, working on an app and would love to get access to WFP to be able to publish workers for different users of the app. Is it possible to request access here, I'm more than happy to provide feedback to product team.

C

cosbgn•3/21/24, 2:49 PM

Hey does anyone knows how to upload a script via API?

I'm trying:

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

And I keep getting:

"could not read content for part metadata"

"could not read content for part metadata"

"could not read content for part metadata"

"could not read content for part metadata"

Ccosbgn Hey does anyone knows how to upload a script via API? I'm trying: ```js const...

C

Chaika•3/21/24, 2:58 PM

iirc

formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))

should be

formData.append('metadata', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))

C

cosbgn•3/21/24, 3:04 PM

Great, using file an metadata it now works:

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

Thanks a lot

Ttanushree │ Workers PM ❓ Question for this group — would you be interesting in sharing you’ve built or...

C

cosbgn•3/22/24, 5:43 PM

Sent you a DM

N

Nick Randall•3/27/24, 8:21 PM

Hello! Anybody know if it's possible to CNAME a custom domain to the domain of a worker published to "workers for platforms"? Basically I want to CNAME "www.fancydomain.com" -> "fancyapp.dispatcher.domain.com" where the dispatch worker is tied to

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

NNick Randall Hello! Anybody know if it's possible to CNAME a custom domain to the domain of a...

D

DaniFoldi•3/27/24, 8:39 PM

Hey! For something like that I think you'll need to use Custom Hostnames from Cloudflare for SaaS, and have your dispatcher worker respond to

*/*

*/*

*/*

*/* routes

R

robOP•4/3/24, 9:00 PM

can you bind KV /d1 etc to a worker via API calls or do you need to use the toml file for that

Rrob can you bind KV /d1 etc to a worker via API calls or do you need to use the toml...

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/3/24, 11:13 PM

API calls, and in fact for Workers for Platforms (different from regular Workers) that's the only way to bind things to user workers.

so what if a client is hosting their domain on cloudflar managing their dns, will it create an issue

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads