how can I get this policy fixed? ```cs nodes:1 Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://wings.vmlx.org:
how can I get this policy fixed?
EAdd the IP to IP Access Rules as "Allow" and they will bypass every security feature on your zone including the existing applied RL block
EIts under Security > WAF > Tools
Csomething within ptero/your wings config itself. It seems to think ptero is at
pteroWell, you could potentially use a Transform Rule to override it, but it'd probably be best to fix the root issue
Zthe error and problem happens only when I use vmlx.org instead of ptero.vmlx.org in the browser
CYou have pterodactyl setup on two different hostnames, it seems?
CWhy not just pick one (ex: ptero) and redirect? Or pick root, change config, and redirect from the ptero subdomain
Zyou are right, let me try to only use one
Zswitched to one hostname. How to redirect?
Z
!how make cloudflare waf rule Expression for,
that for all DENY access to https://zl.epik.tk/* but https://zl.epik.tk/u/* ALLOW access for all? please help
that for all DENY access to https://zl.epik.tk/* but https://zl.epik.tk/u/* ALLOW access for all? please help
Zreading documentation on how to redirect ..
Cwhich one did you pick, the root
https://vmlx.org@Chaika ptero.vmlx.org
ZI am thinking it would be good to create a rurle to redirect vmlx.org to ptero.vmlx.org
Cthen that error makes no sense, shouldn't be getting that if you're on the ptero subdomain. Are you still getting it?
Z@Chaika no, the error only happens when I use vmlx.org. It does not happen when I use ptero.vmlx.org. This is why I want to create a rule to redirect vmlx.org to ptero.vmlx.org
!OK work 
I have same ip on list
I switch Ip from unlimited mobile data than isp to test
I have same ip on listI switch Ip from unlimited mobile data than isp to test
CMight be easier if you made a post in #general-help. I don't understand in which way it doesn't work though, or how that rule matches up with the one you were talking about
Coh, you can make a simple one under Redirect Rules -> Single Redirects, something like:
Cconcat("https://ptero.vmlx.org", http.request.uri.path)CBulk Redirects can be useful too but are a bit more annoying to setup, and Page Rules are going away eventually
ZI just set it up the redirect rule from vmlx.org to ptero.vmlx.org and its working fine (I think 
)
)Zit is redirecting and no more errors
CYou're not keeping the path and you're using a 301 (permanent redirect, cachable) redirect instead of 302, but close enough. It'll work if you don't care about the path or changing it in the future
Z@Chaika let me set it up the way on your screenshot
CIf you don't care about the path or it being cached for up to an hour you don't need to, was just saying
ZI don't know the difference
Flove the fact it keeps my brain engaged
Ado workers subrequests use h3 ?
HYou need to transfer it to an external registrar, then transfer it back
Jfetch inside workers is all http/1.1 today afaik
Adoes it persist connections ?
Dwasn't the 
__cfduid cookie deprecated? i still see it on some cloudflare sites i visit EWhich sites?
EThere is similarly named
https://developers.cloudflare.com/fundamentals/reference/policies-compliances/cloudflare-cookies/
__cfruid and _cfuvid which are in use for rate limiting users, but __cfduid shouldn't be set anymore by us to my understandinghttps://developers.cloudflare.com/fundamentals/reference/policies-compliances/cloudflare-cookies/
Ddiscord.com
Dthe cookie name is a little bit different though:
__dcfduid
EAny other sites? That one not starting with
__cf and having the d makes me think its something custom. I can't see any trace of that cookie being something known to us as one we useDoh nvm i think that is a custom cookie
ENo worries
DHow can I block /wp-admin but allow /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php? in zero trust
NIt appears that chromium zstd support is coming along nicely, with the main issue marked as fixed yesterday.
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40196713
Is this something cloudflare is following and will be implementing through workers, cache, r2 etc?
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40196713
Is this something cloudflare is following and will be implementing through workers, cache, r2 etc?
ECreate an Access Application for /wp-admin set to Allow and then create another for /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php which is set to Bypass and allows
Everyone
TI ran a peering request but the sessions were not logical, how do I make a new request?
T
CI don't think its that bad, iirc its built on DOs and Websockets. DOs get their limits reset on every new websocket message, so you'd just be paying for a Durable Object to be active for a while
Cnowadays you have websocket hiberation too, if you refactored it to use that could be really cheap
DIs Anyone else No longer able to customize the app launcher? it was in beta and I changed some of the settings but now I can't change anything because the setting isn't available
https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/applications/app-launcher/#customize-app-launcher-appearance
https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/applications/app-launcher/#customize-app-launcher-appearance
Cloudflare Docs
With the Access App Launcher, users can easily open all applications that they have access to from a single dashboard.
