is anyone having issues with mailchannels on workers? getting `"Get \"http://customer-accounts-servi

is anyone having issues with mailchannels on workers? getting

"Get \"http://customer-accounts-service.outbound.svc.cluster.local.:9292/v1/accounts/cloudflare\": read tcp 100.112.254.53:39318->100.70.108.250:9292: read: connection reset by peer"

"Get \"http://customer-accounts-service.outbound.svc.cluster.local.:9292/v1/accounts/cloudflare\": read tcp 100.112.254.53:39318->100.70.108.250:9292: read: connection reset by peer"

"Get \"http://customer-accounts-service.outbound.svc.cluster.local.:9292/v1/accounts/cloudflare\": read tcp 100.112.254.53:39318->100.70.108.250:9292: read: connection reset by peer"

"Get \"http://customer-accounts-service.outbound.svc.cluster.local.:9292/v1/accounts/cloudflare\": read tcp 100.112.254.53:39318->100.70.108.250:9292: read: connection reset by peer"

Jjlworkshop for example, your CF page served at example.com, and you would like to trigger y...

user•4/7/24, 7:17 AM

._.

user•4/7/24, 7:17 AM

hadn’t thought of that.

johtso•4/7/24, 9:57 AM

Does anyone know what's up with this style of import? https://github.com/cloudflare/js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo/blob/main/public-admin-api-interfaces%2Fpublic-service%2Fsrc%2Findex.ts#L1

GitHub

js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo/public-admin-api-interfaces/public-serv...

Contribute to cloudflare/js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo development by creating an account on GitHub.

johtso•4/7/24, 9:58 AM

Seems strange to be importing a type from .js in a typescript project.. but I can't get RPC types working and this is the only difference I can see..

johtso•4/7/24, 11:13 AM

aha, apparently it's to do with using module: preserve and moduleResolution: Bundler

johtso•4/7/24, 11:14 AM

Is it intended behavior that RPC calls to services appear as "Unknown Event - Ok @ 07/04/2024, 12:11:08" in logs?

johtso•4/7/24, 1:16 PM

Okay, so switching to @cloudflare/workers-types/experimental@cloudflare/workers-types/experimental fixes my type issues with Workers RPC

johtso•4/7/24, 1:17 PM

is this a bug? should @cloudflare/workers-types/2023-07-01@cloudflare/workers-types/2023-07-01 support the new RPC functionality?

James•4/7/24, 1:17 PM

Not yet afaik: https://cfdata.lol/workerd/

workerd - Cloudflare Datamining

Automated datamining from workerd, the Cloudflare Workers runtime. Including compatibility flags.

James•4/7/24, 1:18 PM

RPC is only enabled by default since 2024-04-03. I imagine there will be a new types compat date cut soon

JJames Not yet afaik: https://cfdata.lol/workerd/

johtso•4/7/24, 1:40 PM

oh that's a handy page!

johtso•4/7/24, 1:41 PM

opened a docs issue https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/issues/13899

johtso•4/7/24, 1:42 PM

@James but actually, I'm double confused now. The demo repo uses 2023-07-01.. and after cloning it there don't seem to be any type errors https://github.com/cloudflare/js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo/blob/d1180c6d17983ca10e775009fc05d4aa9c01dc01/tsconfig.json#L16

johtso•4/7/24, 1:43 PM

don't know if there's an easy way to see what types have changed between two compatibility versions

James•4/7/24, 1:46 PM

Hmm that's odd. I guess it's not a breaking types change so it's probably in all of them

James•4/7/24, 1:47 PM

I have https://npmdiff.dev/@cloudflare%2fworkers-types/4.20230419.0/4.20230511.0/ for diffing between npm versions, but not that useful for quickly diffing two files in each folder. You could probably just throw those 2 files from the most recent version into a diff checker

Aaddison is anyone having issues with mailchannels on workers? getting `"Get \"http://cus...

James•4/7/24, 1:48 PM

This is sadly not a direct solution to your issue, but I would recommend avoiding MailChannels and using some other service like Amazon SES, Sendgrid, Postmark, etc.

There are a lot of security implications and their responses to the situation have been very undesirable. Further reading:

To this day, that have still not truly acknowledged the problems, and brushed it aside or "patched" it with paywalls.

JJames I have https://npmdiff.dev/@cloudflare%2fworkers-types/4.20230419.0/4.20230511.0...

johtso•4/7/24, 1:54 PM

hmm, but this doesn't seem to be a difference in behaviour between release versions, just a difference in behaviour between compatiblity dates

johtso•4/7/24, 1:54 PM

type error with 2023-07-01, no type error with experimental

johtso•4/7/24, 2:28 PM

does anyone know of any kind of instrumentation that works with RPC?

Coffee11•4/7/24, 3:53 PM

bunjs support as runtime?

CCoffee11 bunjs support as runtime?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/7/24, 4:03 PM

Not very likely. Workers runs its own runtime(not Node, Bun, or Deno)

adjlsncm•4/7/24, 6:13 PM

can someone explain why theres 2 different pricing charts for workers? on the homepage it says this

adjlsncm•4/7/24, 6:14 PM

in the docs its this

adjlsncm•4/7/24, 6:16 PM

homepage says 1 million included, .15 per + million, docs say 10 million included, .30 per + million

JJames This is sadly not a direct solution to your issue, but I would recommend avoidin...

addisonOP•4/7/24, 6:52 PM

my understanding is that the spam channel stuff had been fixed after forcing the requirements of domain lockdown records on your domain.

as for direct solution, I reached out to mailchannels directly as from some debugging it seems that it was an issue on their side

Aaddison my understanding is that the spam channel stuff had been fixed after forcing the...

James•4/7/24, 6:54 PM

it was "fixed", yeah, if you add that. Their approach to the situation though has still been very poor, and until recently, you were able to signup on their site for $80 and send verified emails from most of their customers like boston.govboston.gov, because mailchannels don't implement any sender verification

James•4/7/24, 6:54 PM

To this day, they haven't acknowledged the seriousness of the issue, nor alerted their customers afaik. I would heavily advise against using them for any purpose

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:22 PM

interesting

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:22 PM

would really prefer not moving to SES but ill have to look into it

James•4/7/24, 7:26 PM

Sendgrid is also a great option

James•4/7/24, 7:26 PM

Postmark too

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:27 PM

postmark and sendgrid are way out of budget for what im building unfortunately

James•4/7/24, 7:27 PM

Realistically anything other than MailChannels. I've not seen any other provider not do basic domain sender verification