For brew, it's highly likely that the user will be UID/GID 1000, we could install it out on image or

For brew, it's highly likely that the user will be UID/GID 1000, we could install it out on image or have a systemd oneshot that sets it up on first boot

j0rge•4/13/24, 12:17 AM

kyle tried a oneshot but we never got it working right

M2OP•4/13/24, 12:23 AM

Interesting. I'll spin up a VM at some point to try something.

NNiklas ⚡Upgrading the Download Page a bit

Daph•4/13/24, 2:26 AM

just curious, but why aren't there instructions to rebase to the signed image there or on the other main download pages?

DDaph just curious, but why aren't there instructions to rebase to the signed image th...

tryhardsoccermomswag•4/13/24, 2:27 AM

you can't rebase to a signed ublue image from the regular fedora atomic images

tryhardsoccermomswag•4/13/24, 2:28 AM

and if you're rebasing from another signed ublue image then aurora, bluefin, and bazzite will sign the image anyways

Daph•4/13/24, 2:28 AM

yeah, i was just surprised because the way i found out about the signed images was from someone on here and not the website since it wasn't mentioned anywhere

tryhardsoccermomswag•4/13/24, 2:28 AM

well they should auto-sign the images upon first-boot

Daph•4/13/24, 2:28 AM

oh, so is there not much point to using the pre-signed ones?

Ttryhardsoccermomswag well they should auto-sign the images upon first-boot

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:29 AM

Long gone now, instead the ISOs install images already signed

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:29 AM

And then it's an exercise for the user for rebase use cases

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:29 AM

We had that as a stop gap before we had a proper installer

tryhardsoccermomswag•4/13/24, 2:29 AM

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:29 AM

@Emi just means you need to rebase twice

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:29 AM

Once to your image unsigned, then again signed

tryhardsoccermomswag•4/13/24, 2:30 AM

i can't keep up with the changes anymore

Daph•4/13/24, 2:30 AM

that much i understand, but i think it would be helpful for that info to be more easily available to new users if it's important

Daph•4/13/24, 2:36 AM

i don't really understand exactly why it's important, but it seems to be something users are advised to do that wasn't apparent to me through the website or docs

Daph•4/13/24, 2:36 AM

i might be misunderstanding so correct me if I'm wrong

DDaph i don't really understand exactly why it's important, but it seems to be somethi...

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:51 AM

You only need to do something if you're rebasing

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:51 AM

If you use our installers you are perfectly fine out of the box

Kyle Gospo•4/13/24, 2:51 AM

It's why the rebasing documentation is a little buried, it's not the recommended way

Daph•4/13/24, 2:52 AM

That makes sense

Daph•4/13/24, 2:55 AM

I still think it would make sense if that was mentioned somewhere for people who do rebase, considering the first part of rebasing is listed on the download page but not the second part. Or even if it's just in docs (if it is there I haven't found it). But I won't bug you any more about it.

j0rge•4/13/24, 3:37 AM

https://github.com/ublue-os/config/issues/251 if we do this people wouln't have to remember their image anymore, they can toggle version, nvidia, and dx

MM2 For brew, it's highly likely that the user will be UID/GID 1000, we could instal...

fiftydinar•4/13/24, 6:16 AM

if there are multiple users, than GID is not 1000, right?

Ffiftydinar if there are multiple users, than GID is not 1000, right?

M2OP•4/13/24, 10:11 AM

Multiple users or if a user specifies a different UID/GID at install.

However default is 1000/1000. Just trying to make this more convenient

Dans•4/13/24, 10:16 AM

https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/543

GitHub

F39/F40: Fails to boot on with "vmlinuz has invalid signature" · Is...

Describe the bug Trying to rebase an existing SB39 to SB40 fails to boot showing vmlinuz-6.8.1-300.fc40.x86.x64 has invalid signature. you need to load the kernel first on an Thinkpad T495. I was n...

Dans•4/13/24, 10:17 AM

I had a doubt , i don't seem to be affected by this even though I'm on the latest kernel and on Silverblue

Dans•4/13/24, 10:17 AM

I didn't know the bootloader version moves so fast , i thought it stays relatively static and dosent change much

Dans•4/13/24, 10:17 AM

So fedora dosent update the bootloader when it does regular updates?

j0rge•4/13/24, 1:04 PM

we've been watching this (travier gave us a heads up) but haven't seen anything reported yet for a ublue-image

EyeCantCU•4/13/24, 1:46 PM

That's a relief. I haven't had anything pop up on my end following a couple rebases to 40

I have a slightly extended weekend - where are things hurting the most?

j0rge•4/13/24, 1:56 PM

I think mostly just prepping bazzite for 40

j0rge•4/13/24, 1:56 PM

RPMs, etc.

j0rge•4/13/24, 2:02 PM

https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/pull/168 not sure the status of rpmfusion on this one

EyeCantCU•4/13/24, 2:11 PM

I'll take a look

EEyeCantCU I'll take a look 🙂

bsherman•4/13/24, 2:15 PM

That PR should just merge, but only after the package is promoted in rpmfusion, thus providing a clean build

Bbsherman That PR should just merge, but only after the package is promoted in rpmfusion, ...

EyeCantCU•4/13/24, 2:17 PM

Gotcha. I had retriggered the builds but then looking over at RPM Fusion - I'm not seeing it there. I noticed your link points to F39. Did they withdraw it?

EEyeCantCU Gotcha. I had retriggered the builds but then looking over at RPM Fusion - I'm n...

bsherman•4/13/24, 2:27 PM

no, it's never been in F39 updates, only their release... the update will show up when the new version is promoted

EyeCantCU•4/13/24, 2:27 PM

My bad, thanks for clarifying

bsherman•4/13/24, 2:28 PM

it's all good

EEyeCantCU Gotcha. I had retriggered the builds but then looking over at RPM Fusion - I'm n...

bsherman•4/13/24, 2:30 PM

another detail, this tag will switch from "f39-free-updates-testing" to just "f39-free-updates" when promote

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=28538

EEyeCantCU That's a relief. I haven't had anything pop up on my end following a couple reba...

bsherman•4/13/24, 2:31 PM

if you are really looking for stuff to do, i have an inflight PR which needs to be done for at least akmods/main/hwe, current approach is broken, but i have an idea (and it ties to a bigger picture issue)

https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/pull/167

M2OP•4/13/24, 4:32 PM

I moved wallpapers and pictures around. Bluefin stuff is under silverblue, Xe's stuff is still in shared. Created symlinks to the Wallpaper directory for Aurora. Removed the dracut file (that was being deleted when it shouldn't) and put the faces directory into silverblue. Additionally, started adding some logos for bluefin/aurora into place

M2OP•4/13/24, 4:32 PM

https://github.com/ublue-os/bluefin/pull/1128

GitHub

chore: branding and cleaning by m2Giles · Pull Request #1128 · ublu...