Doing a GET to /workers/traces works for me, it returns an array of all the traces set up

B

BenyOP•5/8/24, 10:38 AM

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/[account_id]/workers/traces

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/[account_id]/workers/traces

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/[account_id]/workers/traces

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/[account_id]/workers/traces

BBeny Doing a GET to /workers/traces works for me, it returns an array of all the trac...

Y

yurynix•5/8/24, 11:01 AM

yep, that's the call I'm making:

curl -v -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<acc>>/workers/traces

curl -v -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<acc>>/workers/traces

curl -v -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<acc>>/workers/traces

curl -v -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/<acc>>/workers/traces

I get:

< HTTP/2 404 
< date: Wed, 08 May 2024 11:00:15 GMT
< content-type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
< cf-ray: 8808f1e77d9e7d95-TLV
< cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
< set-cookie: __cflb=0H28vgHxwvgAQtjUGU4yFBDJQfw1pfzuRDHHrrfFEmB; SameSite=Lax; path=/; expires=Wed, 08-May-24 13:30:16 GMT; HttpOnly
< vary: Accept-Encoding
< set-cookie: __cfruid=3fd212d653c86dd50df497588a24bf4403b8069c-1715166015; path=/; domain=.api.cloudflare.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
< server: cloudflare
< 
{
  "result": null,
  "success": false,
  "errors": [
    {
      "code": 10108,
      "message": "workers.api.error.trace_not_found"
    }
  ],
  "messages": []
}
* Connection #0 to host api.cloudflare.com left intact

< HTTP/2 404 
< date: Wed, 08 May 2024 11:00:15 GMT
< content-type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
< cf-ray: 8808f1e77d9e7d95-TLV
< cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
< set-cookie: __cflb=0H28vgHxwvgAQtjUGU4yFBDJQfw1pfzuRDHHrrfFEmB; SameSite=Lax; path=/; expires=Wed, 08-May-24 13:30:16 GMT; HttpOnly
< vary: Accept-Encoding
< set-cookie: __cfruid=3fd212d653c86dd50df497588a24bf4403b8069c-1715166015; path=/; domain=.api.cloudflare.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
< server: cloudflare
< 
{
  "result": null,
  "success": false,
  "errors": [
    {
      "code": 10108,
      "message": "workers.api.error.trace_not_found"
    }
  ],
  "messages": []
}
* Connection #0 to host api.cloudflare.com left intact

< HTTP/2 404 
< date: Wed, 08 May 2024 11:00:15 GMT
< content-type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
< cf-ray: 8808f1e77d9e7d95-TLV
< cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
< set-cookie: __cflb=0H28vgHxwvgAQtjUGU4yFBDJQfw1pfzuRDHHrrfFEmB; SameSite=Lax; path=/; expires=Wed, 08-May-24 13:30:16 GMT; HttpOnly
< vary: Accept-Encoding
< set-cookie: __cfruid=3fd212d653c86dd50df497588a24bf4403b8069c-1715166015; path=/; domain=.api.cloudflare.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
< server: cloudflare
< 
{
  "result": null,
  "success": false,
  "errors": [
    {
      "code": 10108,
      "message": "workers.api.error.trace_not_found"
    }
  ],
  "messages": []
}
* Connection #0 to host api.cloudflare.com left intact

< HTTP/2 404 
< date: Wed, 08 May 2024 11:00:15 GMT
< content-type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
< cf-ray: 8808f1e77d9e7d95-TLV
< cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
< set-cookie: __cflb=0H28vgHxwvgAQtjUGU4yFBDJQfw1pfzuRDHHrrfFEmB; SameSite=Lax; path=/; expires=Wed, 08-May-24 13:30:16 GMT; HttpOnly
< vary: Accept-Encoding
< set-cookie: __cfruid=3fd212d653c86dd50df497588a24bf4403b8069c-1715166015; path=/; domain=.api.cloudflare.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
< server: cloudflare
< 
{
  "result": null,
  "success": false,
  "errors": [
    {
      "code": 10108,
      "message": "workers.api.error.trace_not_found"
    }
  ],
  "messages": []
}
* Connection #0 to host api.cloudflare.com left intact

Yyurynix yep, that's the call I'm making: ``` curl -v -H 'Authorization: Bearer <token>' ...

B

BenyOP•5/8/24, 12:36 PM

Strange, mine is working as expected, and that's not even the error message you get if the trace is not found. It is the error you get if you try to delete a trace that doesn't exist though

R

rob•5/10/24, 4:52 AM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-put-script-content Is this what we should be using to programattically upload a user's code to a worker on WfP?

Cloudflare API Documentation

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

U

Unsmart•5/10/24, 4:57 AM

yes

R

rob•5/10/24, 4:59 AM

or https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-script-upload-worker-module

Cloudflare API Documentation

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

Rrob or https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-script-uplo...

B

BenyOP•5/10/24, 8:51 AM

The first API link you sent is for updating the code only
The second is the one you should use for the initial deployment and if you are changing any bindings

R

rob•5/10/24, 1:22 PM

ah i see.. and whats platform_module then ?

KKai If i create a user script and delete it after 5 minutes does that incur the full...

R

rob•5/11/24, 5:07 AM

We ever get an answer for this?

Rrob ah i see.. and whats platform_module then ?

B

BenyOP•5/11/24, 7:50 PM

That's the name of the file for the example, such as index.js, but theirs is platform_module.mjs

B

BenyOP•5/11/24, 7:56 PM

It lets a user script import another file uploaded by the platform instead of the user

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

R

rob•5/11/24, 8:13 PM

ohh ok,. got it situated. thank you

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:17 PM

As in the shape of the object for the bindings property in your metadata JSON?

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:20 PM

[[dispatch_namespaces]]

[[dispatch_namespaces]]

[[dispatch_namespaces]]

[[dispatch_namespaces]] in TOML maps to an array of these objects in JSON:

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:20 PM

Creating a dispatch namespace is https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-create

Kkian `[[dispatch_namespaces]]` in TOML maps to an array of these objects in JSON: ``...

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:32 PM

A Dynamic Dispatch Worker is just a Worker with one of these bindings

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:32 PM

in the bindings property of the metadata when you're doing the upload, i.e https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-for-platforms/workers-for-platforms/reference/metadata/

V

vmg•5/16/24, 3:23 PM

I'm trying to work with local development mode and get the following error:

[wrangler:err] SyntaxError: "undefined" is not valid JSON

[wrangler:err] SyntaxError: "undefined" is not valid JSON

[wrangler:err] SyntaxError: "undefined" is not valid JSON

[wrangler:err] SyntaxError: "undefined" is not valid JSON

I think it might be missing this bug fix?

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/5658

GitHub

🐛 BUG: requests from workers to DOs (in miniflare) broken in wrangl...

Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to? Wrangler core, Miniflare What version(s) of the tool(s) are you using? 3.51.2 [wrangler] What version of Node are you using? v18.19.0 What operatin...

R

rob•5/20/24, 4:18 PM

on WfP can you use native RPC to talk to other workers on the same namespace? do they have to be service bindings/workers? Just trying to clarify that aspect

Rrob on WfP can you use native RPC to talk to other workers on the same namespace? ...

B

BenyOP•5/20/24, 8:58 PM

Yeah RPC works to the workers in the namespace

R

rob•5/20/24, 8:58 PM

ty

R

rob•5/21/24, 4:37 AM

also is it best practises to do 1 R2 bucker per customer? I Assume yes

Rrob also is it best practises to do 1 R2 bucker per customer? I Assume yes

S

Sam•5/21/24, 7:06 AM

Only if you have less than 1000 customers.
Take a look at https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/reference/limits/

R

rob•5/21/24, 10:45 AM

Interesting , I'm sure they mentioned here they could raise limits

R

rob•5/21/24, 10:45 AM

I'm just trying to follow best flow

Rrob Interesting , I'm sure they mentioned here they could raise limits

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 10:47 AM

They should be able to

Rrob I'm just trying to follow best flow

B

BenyOP•5/21/24, 3:40 PM

I think they'd prefer you used 1 bucket and give each customer a folder, but there are no technical limitations if you wanted 1 per customer.
See Sid's post here: r2

R

rob•5/21/24, 3:40 PM

Yeah I don't mind doing one drive and partitioning g with "folder" prefixes per customer either

R

rob•5/21/24, 3:40 PM

Yeah looking for confirm on which makes more sense .

R

rob•5/21/24, 8:07 PM

My next question is, I see serving static from workers is discontinued? So if my users wanted to deploy frontend static htmk or something what would i do?

Rrob My next question is, I see serving static from workers is discontinued? So if m...

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 8:30 PM

Did Sites ever work with Workers for Platforms? The big thing with Sites was just that it had a package/upload tool(Wrangler) that was supported by the team. Everything it can do, you can build yourself

R

rob•5/21/24, 8:44 PM

yeah it esbuild or something bundles ur frontend into like static assets? thne id do a dist or static folder and like app.servestatic on hono or something, but i saw in thier docs they said it's been dscontinued

R

rob•5/21/24, 8:45 PM

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 8:45 PM

Sites was deprecated many years ago

R

rob•5/21/24, 9:28 PM

yah not sites I was talking about serve static files aspect

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 9:34 PM

That's Sites :p

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 9:35 PM

Pages is the recommended way for now

With convergence static assets will come to Workers officially (Sites was always quite a hack) but that's still a way off

R

rob•5/21/24, 9:39 PM

welp. lol . alright so for WFp if someone wants to deploy static frontend jsut use pages API or something liek that? it won't be able to be served from the same worker ?

WWalshy Pages is the recommended way for now With convergence static assets will come t...

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 10:45 PM

Is there a Pages For Platforms that you can call via a Dispatcher?

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 10:45 PM

Or something similar

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 10:47 PM

no, you can spin up a site though and invoke it (we have customers doing similar just not through wfp)

Ttanushree │ Workers PM Second argument hasn't been implemented (publicly) yet. It's a way to pass bindi...

A

avogadro•5/22/24, 1:04 PM

I want to pass some custom args to the user worker without modifying the original request. Is this not possible right now? could be a good use case of the second parameter in dispatcher.get(..).

W

Walshy•5/22/24, 1:05 PM

jsrpc

W

Walshy•5/22/24, 1:05 PM

You could implement your own fetch handler and pass in whatever you want

W

Walshy•5/22/24, 1:06 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/rpc

Cloudflare Docs

Remote-procedure call (RPC) · Cloudflare Workers docs

The built-in, JavaScript-native RPC system built into Workers and Durable Objects.

A

avogadro•5/22/24, 1:09 PM

Gotcha, I guess I can do that. Would the

cf

cf

cf

cf object still be stripped when passing the

Request

Request

Request

Request through?

Doing a GET to /workers/traces works for me, it returns an array of all the traces set up

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads