I don't want to put env vars in clear text

Nnikiv.dev I don't want to put env vars in clear text

For secrets, you do

wrangler secret put <SECRET_NAME>

wrangler secret put <SECRET_NAME>

nikiv.devOP•6/8/24, 12:05 PM

can i have a file

nikiv.devOP•6/8/24, 12:05 PM

so its declarative

nikiv.devOP•6/8/24, 12:05 PM

like some file i git ignore

nikiv.devOP•6/8/24, 12:05 PM

that is read from wrangler deploy

nikiv.devOP•6/8/24, 12:11 PM

wrangler secret put <SECRET_NAME>

wrangler secret put <SECRET_NAME>

worked tho

Nnikiv.dev that is read from wrangler deploy

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/8/24, 12:15 PM

Nope.

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/8/24, 12:15 PM

Or well

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/8/24, 12:15 PM

You can suggest it in #workers-feature-suggestions

neoney•6/8/24, 5:10 PM

Using this - what is

script

script

neoney•6/8/24, 5:10 PM

Is it the name of the worker I'm trying to add the route to?

Nneoney Is it the name of the worker I'm trying to add the route to?

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/8/24, 5:21 PM

Yes

codebam•6/8/24, 7:14 PM

when I proxy content on my website using a worker I noticed the cache % is close to 0. is there a way to do this without breaking cache?

https://github.com/codebam/proxy-worker

GitHub

GitHub - codebam/proxy-worker

Contribute to codebam/proxy-worker development by creating an account on GitHub.

neoney•6/8/24, 8:27 PM

ok, thanks

HHello, I’m Allie!Here's a PoC that works for me:

Avi•6/8/24, 9:09 PM

i was doing basically the same thing, but storing the reference on the global scope. i wonder if having it be an instance of the DO changes things?

Avi•6/8/24, 9:09 PM

i was also creating the reference in the DO constructor, instead of lazily instantiating it like you are – why are you doing it that way, btw?

Iaci•6/8/24, 10:02 PM

hi all, i'm developing a worker that has access to D1 databases through D1 database bindings (set as variables under D1 Database Bindings). how am i able to reach those databases when i'm developing locally? using queries like this: {results} = await env.IRADB.prepare(<here goes the query>).bind(<binds>).run();

bun•6/9/24, 5:11 AM

uhh, whats wrong here?

bun•6/9/24, 5:13 AM

bun•6/9/24, 5:13 AM

my package.json and my tsconfig.json

Bbun my package.json and my tsconfig.json

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/9/24, 6:02 AM

Do you have any dependencies?

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/9/24, 6:03 AM

It appears that one of your dependencies may be including

@types/node

@types/node

…

Rohit Verma•6/9/24, 6:50 AM

what is the recommended way for large video file(s) upload to r2? Can we get an event on upload complete event in the cloudflare queues for further processing.

HHello, I’m Allie!Do you have any dependencies?

bun•6/9/24, 7:34 AM

puppeteer itself has types/node

Bbun puppeteer itself has types/node

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/9/24, 8:02 AM

Then probably that, yeah

bun•6/9/24, 8:05 AM

theres another error if i just ignore that typescript one, this one is runtime
browser-rendering-api

�

𝖘𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖙𝖞•6/9/24, 9:57 AM

DS112•6/9/24, 2:32 PM

does anyone deploy nest.js to worker?

DS112•6/9/24, 2:32 PM

:NotLikeThis:

Ghost Furry•6/9/24, 6:12 PM

workers are too slow
Sometimes it's not even connecting

It's been happening for 3 days in specific regions like India and Northland Servers

CCook I am doing some perf tuning on a worker. The worker fetches html and does some a...

Chaika•6/10/24, 5:31 PM

Someone else might know more exact details but in essence a fetch request goes through the normal cdn request pipeline

If it's same-zone (worker running on same website as the one its fetching) then it skips some things like Workers, not sure on exactly everything it skips
If it's not same zone it's full request pipeline

Original message was deleted

az•6/10/24, 6:24 PM

the worker was being run on the other side of the world to me and the storage bucket

az•6/10/24, 6:24 PM

check the data centre your requests are being served by

zye•6/11/24, 3:07 AM

Hi, V8 team wrote a blog of the new API of the JSPI proposal. https://v8.dev/blog/jspi-newapi I wonder whether workers will enable this experimental feature anytime soon?

WebAssembly JSPI has a new API · V8

This article details some upcoming changes to the JavaScript Promise Integration (JSPI) API.

Evil Morty•6/11/24, 4:14 AM

Can someone explain this to me? Thank you

EEvil Morty Can someone explain this to me? Thank you

Erisa•6/11/24, 12:41 PM

I raised this discrepancy to the team so it can be fixed. The $0.30/mo on the docs is correct, the 0.15 comes from back when unbound usage model charged for cpu usage as well and you can see the blog linked above for a detailed explanation of what changed

EEvil Morty Can someone explain this to me? Thank you

Erisa•6/11/24, 3:45 PM

This is fixed now

Evil Morty•6/11/24, 9:09 PM

Thank you

OOlivier F Hi 👋 I’m wondering what’s the best way to use two different workers using the...

Erisa•6/11/24, 9:27 PM

Where do you want requests not including /v1 or /v2 to go?

But for anything path based, Routes are the answer. You can either layer one on top of a Custom Domain, have nothing underneath (dummy aaaa record

100::

100::

) or put an origin underneath if you want/need

mwit•6/12/24, 10:13 AM

changed my workers subdomain, now no (old or new) workers seem to work ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCHERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH
https://falling-haze-182d.cf-webhook.workers.dev/
dns issue?

Mmwit changed my workers subdomain, now no (old or new) workers seem to work `ERR_SSL_...

Ghost Furry•6/12/24, 10:17 AM

It's live now
DNS propagation takes time

I don't want to put env vars in clear text

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads