Cit'll get better implementations soon I have no doubt
Rpackage mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.0.5, but none of the providers can be installed
- package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.0.5, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both mesa-filesystem-24.0.9-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates and mesa-filesystem-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
- cannot install both mesa-filesystem-24.0.9-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates and mesa-filesystem-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora
- package mesa-dri-drivers-24.0.9-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.0.9-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
CNothing to do with 3D TVs
MThat uh, doesn’t look like a flatpak
Mthat looks like an rpm
VIt was a comparison lol
Rstill not working after reboot
Krpm-ostree status | fpaste
Hour images already provide mesa drivers what are you trying to do
MThat's a pretty goofy statement. HDR is at its best right now with content meant for TVs like movies and television shows. Stuff like YouTube HDR will always be dependent on the person creating the content because it is not a curated platform
Kare you just trying to disable discover
Ryup
MI dare anyone to watch Mad Max Fury Road in HDR vs SDR and say it makes no difference.
CIf anything it's got more to do with the initial push of color television
Klaunch discover overlay and turn it off in the settings
V3D was also always dependant on the people creating it, that's why it was often pretty meh.
Kthat's it
Rjust update through topgrade
Kor delete that desktop file in /etc
KHrpm-ostree status | fpasteThe HDR presentation of almost any modern curated video content ie blu ray, netflix, etc, is a superior viewing experience to SDR
KI don't see any layered packages here, and it says you've got a newer image you can boot into
Kreboot and run it again
NCan anyone point me how to change my grub order on bazzite?
Kwhat are you trying to accomplish
NI want windows to be my default and Bazzite my second option
KI'm not sure you can
NGotcha, thanks
MThe problem is that you need a screen that actually supports HDR to its fullest, so 800 nits would probably be the minimum peak brightness you can get away with HDR looking correct. Otherwise, things will look overexposed or like vivid mode because its fake hdr displaying on like a 400 nit crappy LCD. I don't know much about what phones consider HDR these days
Tim going to test some game peformance in a steam game, waht do you suggest i use for on screen monitoring?
Kmangohud for frametime graphs/framerate, obs for recording
Tthanks ill take a look at the mangohud!
Dit annoys me to no end that the LG monitor i got does not include this spec, just says that it supports hdr
Dhow can i find the peak brightness through software?
Dor would i need some special instrument to measure it?
MYou would need equipment I think. I would check to see if RTINGS or something has a review of it, or try and find what panel it has inside
Dit’s nanoips, i know that for sure, but alright i’ll look into it on rtings
MDepending on the monitors age it may have a specific certification from VESA. They usually do like HDR400, 600, 800, 1000
5Honestly if the monitor is from >3 years ago its probably really bad. HDR 400 isn't even really HDR. And it didnt work on IPS monitors without local dimming which isn't great
5HDR is a ratio though. The max brightness of OLED TVs doesnt need to be as bright as LCD TVs. Though OLED TVs even from a few years ago go up to 1000 I think
5It can depend on your room. If your not willing to compromise on curtains or position. But I think OLED TV in a dark room is worth it
5And I dont know how they do HDR on phones but it usually looks good so idk
MOled have an infinite black level which throws a wrench in a normal conversation about it. HDR is actually more about contrast than brightness. The higher peak brightness the better, but it all depends on what the content is graded for, and there will be diminishing returns after a certain point. Yes, the higher contrast will be there, but can you even see it? I find more value in better contrast in dark areas than bright. So oled is superior
5Thats true. Theres HDR and then theres "LG's HDR test footage"
5I was watching the first episode of Kingdom on Netflix and I swear LG must have sponsored cause HDR looked amazing
5And I also like the dark cause I play a lot of horror games
5Makes me wonder how the HDR grading works on games though
MI think that 1000 nits is a realistic expectation going forward for consumer HDR. Maybe not on LCDs but I don’t think I’ll ever buy an lcd panel again if I can help it. It still looks better than SDR and can be obtained at reasonable prices
