What modifications would i need to do to my crosswind to mount the ffb kit?
What modifications would i need to do to my crosswind to mount the ffb kit?
VHey, thanks for the reply 
I've made a request
I've made a request
V:package: 
RHINO #0622 Has Shipped!
RHINO #0622 Has Shipped!V:package: 
RHINO #0621 Has Shipped!
RHINO #0621 Has Shipped!V:package: RHINO #0623 Has Shipped!
RHINO #0623 Has Shipped!
WHiob's mod doesn't require any modifications: https://discord.com/channels/965234441511383080/1255151401542357055
My pending design would require 4 additional holes
My pending design would require 4 additional holes
SHiobs looks like a DIY kit? And "pending" so ur not shipping yet?
SCan you explain a little more how it feels off to you?
GOn the mustang it works fine. But the y axis (pitch) on the spitfire starts at 10% pull, so the plane immediately starts going nose up. And the range on the y axis , if i push the stick it goes 80% from center and if i pull the stick it goes 100% of the range. So if I could change the neutral position on the lua files I think it would solve it. Other people reported pitching problems with the spitfire before, and it was a bug on the module because it went away by it self. Was not double mapping or anything like that.
SOk, and in what situation it started with 10% pull? Airstart?
GAny circumstance. Dark on the ground, airstsrt
GAll
GI managed to center the y axis messing with the "invert y axis" option and then going to the mapping of the pitch "tune center" and inverting again. That way it centers , but its too sensible, but if I add any curve or saturation to make it feel better it goes off center again
GI think the main issue here is the unbalanced pitch axis, it goes 90% pushing the stick but goes 100% when I pull the stick. (Full range of values from center) if I could change that somewhere in the lua files for the spitfire module
GBut I didn't find anything on the default lua in the module to change the values of the pitch axis
SAre you adding curves in DCS? I think that might be your problem. You should be running your axis without any adjustment in DCS
GThe problem only happens with the spitfire module, and other people had the same issue.
GIn the beginning it had the problem even without any curves.
GBut I figured how to overcome that by inverting the axis. But the module still has the unbalanced pitch axis. I'm trying to find a way to change the neutral position on the lua files for this module.
SOk. I'll give it a try when I'm back home
SOnly flown the Mustang
CIs there a FFB kit or adapter anyone has published for the VKB Pedals? I thought I saw one a while back but can't find it now
AI may have to start calling my MFGs pendals from now on
GThanks
1Does anyone know the lead time for a DIY kit to the states?
Sabout 6 days
1oh awesome, thanks
Wim reading throught the assembly manual from github right now, and in the beginning it mentions 20V DC power supply, when in the end it mentions a 24V one, which one is a better choice? I already have a 19.5V laptop power supply, would that work fine?
M24 is the better option these days.... you get more power on less amps which is a good thing. The 20vdc recommendation is a vestigial remnant from the beginning of the project when the caps or other components in the drives had lower ratings than they do these days
Wokay, i will run it off the laptop one until a 24V one arrives then. Thank you!
OWell I got someone to sort out the sim, and that VP Rhino is something special.
A bit more fiddling and I’ll have it just like my ikarus I’m learning in.
No more no feel touch and go’s, I’ve got a month to get my landings sorted before my lessons start again.
Happy days
A bit more fiddling and I’ll have it just like my ikarus I’m learning in.
No more no feel touch and go’s, I’ve got a month to get my landings sorted before my lessons start again.
Happy days
Dhey guys, just trying to understand something
D
Dthe article has the 86BLF04 @ 4.2nm. but on the website this says it's 1.05nm peak
OList should be 01 yes?
Dand in the post in FAQ it says 57BLF03 which is 1.6nm is in the Rhino? but says the Rhino produces up to 9nm
DD20+nm can be achieved
BProper reduction means what gearing?
A9Nm is the entire system's performance
Son those charts the 01 and 04 are switched. same with the 57 size
Aevery chart i google has the same organization that drake linked above? :thonk:
Ahere's another that i found
Abut yeah, weird :thonk:
S4,3,2,1,6,7
Sits like the worst order to watch star wars or something
Ahaha
WThere are many different manufacturers, some spec the motor models with inverted numbering ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
WThe torque in manufacturer spec is for spinning applications. For holding torque it's best calculated
TqConst[Nm/A] * max_driver_current[A] = Tq[Nm], so on paper 57BLF03 achieves 1.98Nm @ 30A, it's a bit lower in reality
V:package: RHINO #0624 Has Shipped!
RHINO #0624 Has Shipped!V:package: RHINO #0627 Has Shipped!