Arechunk 0.8.1 will use /usr/etc and 0.8.0 will use /etc
Awe verified 0.8.1 will use the correct policy on bazzite and i prd it yesterday
Afor cosmic
RIt was whatever the ISOs were built with.
Will spin some new ISOs
Will spin some new ISOs
Acheck the container image by booting with bash
Athe correct oen should be in /etc
Anot booting by running bash on it
Athere should not be a /usr/etc dir
K@M2 @Robert (p5) got an interesting issue we need to fix
Kas part of moving /usr/etc to /etc, it turns out we were replacing a file in /etc/ provided by a core package by putting the replacement in /usr/etc
Kthat's the container update policy
Kwe need to either
1: Remove it from the signing RPM and replace in the main/ucore image
2: Make our signing rpm provide container-common (Will require us to keep it up to date, not a great concept)
3: Install with --force-allowreplace separately from our other rpms
1: Remove it from the signing RPM and replace in the main/ucore image
2: Make our signing rpm provide container-common (Will require us to keep it up to date, not a great concept)
3: Install with --force-allowreplace separately from our other rpms
RIf I understand correctly:
Fedora provides /etc/containers/policy.json in their image
We now try to add our own /etc/containers/policy.json
Adding our policy fails
?
Fedora provides /etc/containers/policy.json in their image
We now try to add our own /etc/containers/policy.json
Adding our policy fails
?
Kyes and yes
Kpreviously we added it to /usr/etc/containers/policy.json
Kwhich did not conflict, but adding to /usr/etc is undefined behavior according to Colins
Kso now our signing rpm fails to install w/ that error
RAnd (knowing nothing about RPMs) we can't add a PREINSTALL step to the signing RPM which deletes the original file if present?
Kyes that would work
Kas would the force replace param
Aaccording to me, i dont think colin ever considered it
Atbh
Arpm-ostree just mashes the directories together
Kwhar that's not what you said, well regardless we are here
RI think 1 and 2 aren't a great option. 1 due to the unnecessary duplication and 2 due to needing to keep a core dependency up-to-date
As for the force replace param, that's a parameter needing to be defined at RPM install time?
As for the force replace param, that's a parameter needing to be defined at RPM install time?
Athe code path mashes the directories together
Kyou got it
RI hate to say it... But I like my idea 
Kyeah, let me try it then
Ai dont think colin has realized you have been putting files in both /etc and /usr/etc yet
Aor thought people would do that
Ayou can see it here though in the docs
Abut why does this conflict though? Shouldnt the file in /etc get replaced?
ROh, that's not really what I meant, but it works.
I thought there could be a way to bundle that instruction as part of the RPM
I thought there could be a way to bundle that instruction as part of the RPM
Knot if another package owns it
Ksadly no
Aisnt /etc an exception?
Knope
Ai know rpm-ostree hates it for every file
Awe have another issue with that because wine-core causes the same issue
K
K
Kand removing doesn't fix it
Kcool
Awhy is the file provided as a package though?
Kso, force allow replace
Kreplace in-image and not via rpm
Kor uhh
