JDon't think so
Bi've been mentioned on bootc and composefs threads related to F41
JAnd the outstanding issues and prs all across the project that are unaddressed
JAnd nickname and I are the only ones helping on the forum
JImo it's time for another scope focus
NEspecially with F41 coming up.
NDo we want to have a voice call for this at a time folks can make?
JUse GitHub
Bthe more actual communication on the issues in github, the more new people can see what is going on
NI meant for discussing this. We can use Github to record everything.
JI mean to discuss it too
Bwe have a project board
Bwe can create an issue with F41 task list, and list related issues
Bthat's how you do project stuff
JBootc, composefs are the big ones, no one's really addressed timothees composefs issue
NI understand that, but it would be helpful to me to have a discussion with folks. If we want to do that ad-hoc, that's fine too, I just find calls to be helpful on occasion.
JI'm in Korea dude 
Nlol I know, the call doesn't need to happen today.
JDespite deltas best efforts I may make it home
RI'm hoping I'll have a lot more free time from the middle of next month. I'm late stages interviewing with 2 companies, with 5 other companies in the early stages, so this is taking up a lot of my time.
JWhat's the major ticket items other than bootc and composefs?
JAlways career first, don't sweat it
NThose are the main ones.
JAlmost 8k people in here surely someone knows bash
RSorry, could someone share the bootc issue if we've got one? Created a meta issue for tracking these, and added composefs
Nto be fair, I don't think Fedora has things fully figured out regarding bootc and composefs for F41
Ncomposefs and bootc are interelated I believe, so that issue should cover both.
RDo we know what upstream (Fedora) are planning on doing? I guess we can't really do much on the composefs issue until they make a decision on if it will go ahead for F41
Bthere's threads about this:
- 💾ublue-devBootc Initiative Help Thread
- 💾ublue-devFedora 41 change: composefs enabled by d...
- 💾ublue-devBootc Initiative Help Thread
- 💾ublue-devFedora 41 change: composefs enabled by d...
RAh, so it is only the composefs one. The first thread is a "help wanted" call from Fedora
BYeah, i've been gone and I'm just playing catch up today
Jok found a lounge, I'm available for the next 2h
Ball, looks like the recent
FIX
needs approval:
https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/pull/232
fsync-ba addition in akmods actually replaced fsync, which broke at least Bluefin...FIX
needs approval:
https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/pull/232
GitHub
The preview #231 PR replaced fsync with fsync-ba builds, breaking some downstreams, including bluefin.
KWhoops, thanks
JCan someone rebuild bluefin please? Mac people have busted wifi
Bif you can approve my PR above, i'll get the rebuilds done
JI thought I did, checking
Byou did! it's in merge queue!
JChoo Choo!!
Bit looked like the scheduled bluefin/aurora Latest builds kicked off a bit too soon to catch the fsync fix in akmods... so i cancelled and did manual builds
watching it now
watching it now
Bgreen for both!
J
Jok I'm on the internet now, I'll follow up with the mac people
JMission focus thread
JI like how every time you want to add a new upcoming version of Fedora, something breaks https://github.com/joshua-stone/rose-os/actions/runs/10548572494/job/29222624914?pr=27
GitHub
ublue-os with fewer downstream modifications. Contribute to joshua-stone/rose-os development by creating an account on GitHub.
JThis time around it looks like the reproducible build scripts are breaking things https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReproduciblePackageBuilds
BAt first glance, it looks like a problem with building the fonts package. Did Fedora change some thing about RPM build in that reproduceability change?
JSeemingly it's a problem with chmod
+ /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w /tmp/rose-os/rpmbuild/BUILD/rose-os-fonts-0.1-buildJBecause it still fails if I pass
--undefine __brp_add_determinism