is there any more info on when Workflows will be in public beta? it was mentioned back in April 2024

is there any more info on when Workflows will be in public beta? it was mentioned back in April 2024 but hasn't been mentioned since, as far as I know

Mminty is there any more info on when Workflows will be in public beta? it was mentione...

Ashley•9/17/24, 10:17 PM

It is Birthday Week next week though, so usually lots of announcements then!

ac•9/17/24, 10:46 PM

Hi, where should I expect cron runs to show up in the worker dashboard? In the docs it says

Users can review the execution history of their Cron Triggers in Past Cron Events under Logs ↗

Users can review the execution history of their Cron Triggers in Past Cron Events under Logs ↗

but I don't see "Past Cron Events" anywhere for my worker

Walshy•9/17/24, 10:52 PM

do you definitely have a cron trigger?

Walshy•9/17/24, 10:52 PM

the tab is only hidden if you don't have a cron

ac•9/17/24, 10:57 PM

Yeah, and I can see it running every 2 mins if I tail the logs

ac•9/17/24, 10:58 PM

I see the Logs (beta) tab but there's nothing but this in there (it's a fairly new Worker, created about an hour ago, if that helps)

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:00 PM

ohhhhh

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:00 PM

right we enabled this for everyone

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:00 PM

cron triggers have moved, they now live in settings

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:01 PM

there's a "View events" when looking at your trigger

HS•9/17/24, 11:01 PM

@Walshy | Deploying What would be best approach to cache a access token received after a POST request (made within the worker) to an API endpoint? We are hoping to re-use this token for any subsequent requests (until the token validity, 1 week) to additional API endpoints within the same worker function? Is it possible to use cache API for it? Or do we need to use KV store instead?

I tried setting

cacheTtl

cacheTtl

cf

cf

object in the fetch request, but it doesn't seem to do anything, which I assume is due to it being a

POST

POST

request (

CF-Cache-Status

CF-Cache-Status

always returns

DYNAMIC

DYNAMIC

for this response).

WWalshy there's a "View events" when looking at your trigger

ac•9/17/24, 11:02 PM

Really appreciate your help, but that option isn't there for me

HHS @Walshy | Deploying What would be best approach to cache a access token received...

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:02 PM

cache api you can do yeah otherwise kv - both good options -- cache is per-colo so you may have issues with that

Aac Really appreciate your help, but that option isn't there for me 😦

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:02 PM

blahhhhh we enabled this feature but not the other one

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:02 PM

hold - sorry!

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:03 PM

what's your account id? i can opt you in quick

WWalshy cache api you can do yeah otherwise kv - both good options -- cache is per-colo ...

HS•9/17/24, 11:04 PM

Thank you!

WWalshy what's your account id? i can opt you in quick

ac•9/17/24, 11:04 PM

sent you a DM

Walshy•9/17/24, 11:06 PM

alright enabled, should be available in a min if you refresh

ac•9/17/24, 11:07 PM

I see it now! Thank you!!

ac•9/17/24, 11:09 PM

It does say

There have been no events in the past week.

There have been no events in the past week.

which is not true, but I assume if I just give it some time something will show up?

Avi•9/18/24, 12:03 AM

Avi•9/18/24, 12:03 AM

anyone know if there's an outage with this feature?

AAvi Click to see attachment

Walshy•9/18/24, 12:08 AM

can you send me a HAR? Shoot me an email

walshy@

walshy@

WWalshy can you send me a HAR? Shoot me an email `walshy@`

Avi•9/18/24, 2:48 AM

POST https://dash.cloudflare.com/api/v4/accounts/:accountId/workers/observability/telemetry/query-run

POST https://dash.cloudflare.com/api/v4/accounts/:accountId/workers/observability/telemetry/query-run

returns

{
    "success": false,
    "messages": [],
    "errors": [
        {
            "code": 10104,
            "message": "workers_observability.api.error.authentication.no_access_to_workers_observability"
        }
    ],
    "result": null
}

{
    "success": false,
    "messages": [],
    "errors": [
        {
            "code": 10104,
            "message": "workers_observability.api.error.authentication.no_access_to_workers_observability"
        }
    ],
    "result": null
}

Avi•9/18/24, 2:48 AM

@Walshy | Deploying lmk if you still want a full HAR file

Avi•9/18/24, 2:49 AM

same 403 and error code for

workers/observability/telemetry/keys

workers/observability/telemetry/keys

AAvi @Walshy | Deploying lmk if you still want a full HAR file

Isaac McFadyen•9/18/24, 4:06 AM

Think it might still be good to have a HAR. The issue isn't that you don't have access (because you just haven't turned on Worker Observability from the button that should be shown) but that the dashboard should show you a modal that tells you to enable it and gives you a button, and it's not.

WWalshy can you send me a HAR? Shoot me an email `walshy@`

Avi•9/18/24, 5:18 AM

sent

Śūnyatā 空•9/18/24, 6:22 AM

Hey guys!
I've seen this blog from Cloudflare, and I think it's a huge step forward the node ecosystem!
We now can polyfill and mock the non-implemented node packages very easily. However there is something I don't achieve to polyfill:

__dirname

__dirname

and

__filename

__filename

. Those variables are from the global scope and I didn't achieve to mock them though the

[alias]

[alias]

feature of the wrangler.toml.
Any idea?
Thank!

ŚŚūnyatā 空 Hey guys! I've seen [this blog](https://blog.cloudflare.com/more-npm-packages-on...

kian•9/18/24, 12:37 PM

Do you mean

[define]

[define]

? That is for global variable substitution.

Kkian Do you mean `[define]`? That is for global variable substitution.

Śūnyatā 空•9/18/24, 12:40 PM

In the blog I've shared, they talk about this new feature that allow us to mock un-implemented node functions

But it only works for functions, not variables!

Original message was deleted

Śūnyatā 空•9/18/24, 1:01 PM

Got it thanks! I saw that

define

define

accept a

Record<string, string>

Record<string, string>

.
In my case I want to set

__dirname

__dirname

. I tried to set it like the following:

[define]
__dirname = "./"

[define]
__dirname = "./"

But I got the following error:

error: Invalid define value (must be an entity name or valid JSON syntax): ./

error: Invalid define value (must be an entity name or valid JSON syntax): ./

Then I tried workaround this error by setting it like that:

[define]
__dirname = "{'foo': 'bar'}"

[define]
__dirname = "{'foo': 'bar'}"

but of course my pluggin that uses

__dirname

__dirname

is not happy:

The "path" argument must be of type string. Received an instance of Object

The "path" argument must be of type string. Received an instance of Object

Do you have any idea?

Original message was deleted

Śūnyatā 空•9/18/24, 1:25 PM

Thanks a lot! You've made my day

Original message was deleted

Murder Chicken•9/19/24, 12:15 PM

What exactly was alluded to regarding workflows? Any high-level description of what's on the roadmap for them?

MMurder Chicken What exactly was alluded to regarding workflows? Any high-level description of ...

Ashley•9/19/24, 12:44 PM

https://blog.cloudflare.com/data-anywhere-events-pipelines-durable-execution-workflows

The Cloudflare Blog

Data Anywhere with Pipelines, Event Notifications, and Workflows

We’re making it easier to build scalable, reliable, data-driven applications on top of our global network, and so we’re announcing a new Event Notifications framework; our take on durable execution, Workflows; and an upcoming streaming ingestion service, Pipelines

Ddave the issue I'm having is I'm confused if mTLS is actually being used for these re...

laurmat•9/19/24, 1:27 PM

Did you figure this out?

Leo_C•9/20/24, 2:40 AM

Has anyone encountered this error: Route pattern must include your zone? I am sure that my route includes my zone, everything is the same as usual. It seems like the system has updated something, and the page UI is also different from before. I'm not entirely sure if this is the reason for the bug.

SSZAGLAM Is it possible to set up mTLS between two workers?

laurmat•9/20/24, 5:27 AM

Did you manage to do mTLS between 2 workers?

Bram Roets•9/20/24, 7:19 AM

Has anyone experienced a situation where Cloudflare Workers Metrics show “Worker threw exception,” but the logs pushed by Logpush don’t contain any errors? I’m having trouble debugging this issue and would appreciate any insights.

Bram Roets•9/20/24, 7:21 AM

Schermafbeelding_2024-09-20_om_09.20.59.png

Schermafbeelding_2024-09-20_om_09.21.18.png

Jadugar_Jaggu•9/20/24, 8:44 AM

Hey Getting many errors related to 1200 error code suddenly

Jadugar_Jaggu•9/20/24, 8:45 AM

past 30 minutes

Original message was deleted

Jadugar_Jaggu•9/20/24, 9:11 AM

My origin server is cloudflare worker itself, and using D1 inside it

Jadugar_Jaggu•9/20/24, 9:12 AM

so Technically there was may be some issue with workers , now it's working fine

o7•9/20/24, 10:10 AM

subrequest limit for paid workers is 1000.. what about cron triggers? Still 1000? or can we go above that

Oo7 subrequest limit for paid workers is 1000.. what about cron triggers? Still 1000...

Jadugar_Jaggu•9/20/24, 10:11 AM

still 1000

JJadugar_Jaggu still 1000

o7•9/20/24, 10:12 AM

BBernardo Hi everyone, why I can't use mtls_certificates binding without `--remote`? I cr...

laurmat•9/20/24, 11:22 AM

Did you make it work? I’m trying to create mTLS between two workers, but it seems the cert is not present on the sender worker, even if I did all the steps in their guide.

ac•9/20/24, 1:27 PM

I can't load the new Settings tab for one of my workers, I just get this every time. Any tips?

{ "success": false, "messages": [], "errors": [ { "code": 10104, "message": "workers_observability.api.error.authentication.no_access_to_workers_observability" } ], "result": null }

is there any more info on when Workflows will be in public beta? it was mentioned back in April 2024

Similar Threads