Cloudflare Developers•13mo ago

The difference is nearly tenfold，So I'm wondering if there's been a change in the cpu time calculati

The difference is nearly tenfold，So I'm wondering if there's been a change in the cpu time calculation strategy.

MMetaSky The difference is nearly tenfold，So I'm wondering if there's been a change in th...

Isaac McFadyen•12/1/24, 11:05 PM

The bill is milliseconds (

ms

ms

) and the GraphQL query is microseconds (

us

us

) so that would account for the 10x difference.

IIsaac McFadyen The bill is milliseconds (`ms`) and the GraphQL query is microseconds (`us`) so ...

MetaSkyOP•12/1/24, 11:08 PM

i think 1ms = 1000us, I've excluded it in the picture above

MMetaSky i think 1ms = 1000us, I've excluded it in the picture above

Isaac McFadyen•12/1/24, 11:08 PM

Yeah sorry, I think you're right

Isaac McFadyen•12/1/24, 11:08 PM

As in, those numbers do line up, it's just that they're in different formats

IIsaac McFadyen As in, those numbers do line up, it's just that they're in different formats

MetaSkyOP•12/1/24, 11:09 PM

So how do you explain the tenfold difference in cpu time? I think they are both in ms, is there any difference in format?

MetaSkyOP•12/1/24, 11:24 PM

If the cpu time calculation is increased by a factor of 10, then this reflects a 10-fold increase in the amount of cpu time for the November billing.

MMetaSky If the cpu time calculation is increased by a factor of 10, then this reflects a...

Isaac McFadyen•12/1/24, 11:43 PM

You seem to have it the wrong way around? The 6 524 number is what you're being billed for while the 61 442 number is from GraphQL, so if anything, you're being billed 10x less than what GraphQL shows?

IIsaac McFadyen You seem to have it the wrong way around? The 6 524 number is what you're being ...

MetaSkyOP•12/1/24, 11:45 PM

this is my September bill data, use this method the October and November bill data will increase 10x

MMetaSky this is my September bill data, use this method the October and November bill da...

Isaac McFadyen•12/1/24, 11:48 PM

If the mismatch is present in September there's no reason to think it won't also be in October/November. Nothing has changed regarding pricing of Workers so if there is a mismatch I'd expect it's either an issue in the billing system (possible, billing system has been undergoing some changes recently) or an issue with the query.

D5•12/1/24, 11:51 PM

Is it possible to set some limits on workers executions or spending so I don't get a big bill?

D5•12/1/24, 11:52 PM

Oh, seems not

D5•12/1/24, 11:52 PM

Sad, another amazing service I can't use due to that

IIsaac McFadyen If the mismatch is present in September there's no reason to think it won't also...

MetaSkyOP•12/1/24, 11:53 PM

price not change, but the cpu time 10x, the total price of bill data increased 10x in my invoice

MMetaSky price not change, but the cpu time 10x, the total price of bill data increased 1...

Isaac McFadyen•12/1/24, 11:58 PM

What I'm wondering is if the actual billing data increased by 10x on your invoice, or if it's just a mismatch between GraphQL and the invoice? From the screenshot you sent it looks like it didn't for September, did you observe this for October or November?

IIsaac McFadyen What I'm wondering is if the actual billing data increased by 10x on your invoic...

MetaSkyOP•12/2/24, 12:18 AM

Yes, I'll send it out later.

IIsaac McFadyen What I'm wondering is if the actual billing data increased by 10x on your invoic...

MetaSkyOP•12/2/24, 1:51 AM

Cpu Time actual billing data did increase by a factor of 10，the amount of users and code remains largely unchanged

MMetaSky Cpu Time actual billing data did increase by a factor of 10，the amount of users ...

1984 Ford Laser•12/2/24, 1:55 AM

I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocation in September then October to compare, see if each instance is using roughly 10x or if theres some small amount of instances hogging time

11984 Ford Laser I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocatio...

MetaSkyOP•12/2/24, 2:01 AM

ok, i will try it

11984 Ford Laser I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocatio...

MetaSkyOP•12/2/24, 2:25 AM

My worker's script in September is deleted and I redeployed the worker scripts in October, so i can't compare with September and October. So the cpu time calculation issue I mentioned before is just a presentation issue and won't affect my bill amount, is that what you mean?

MetaSkyOP•12/2/24, 3:21 AM

If I deploy workerd to the server by myself, can I do performance test for cpu time and request?

GitHub

GitHub - cloudflare/workerd: The JavaScript / Wasm runtime that pow...

The JavaScript / Wasm runtime that powers Cloudflare Workers - cloudflare/workerd

sodepr•12/2/24, 4:33 AM

Hi fork,

Does anyone test static assets with Worker?

The document said that:

Requests to static assets are free and unlimited.

Requests to static assets are free and unlimited.

However, when I accessed the static assets, it increased the

Requests today

Requests today

immediately.

Ssodepr Hi fork, Does anyone test static assets with Worker? The document said that: `...

Isaac McFadyen•12/2/24, 4:51 AM

?channel-crossposting

SuperHelpflare•12/2/24, 4:51 AM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

IIsaac McFadyen ?channel-crossposting

sodepr•12/2/24, 4:53 AM

No, I ask the question for this channel, and give a suggestion in the suggestion feature channel

Ssodepr No, I ask the question for this channel, and give a suggestion in the suggestion...

Isaac McFadyen•12/2/24, 4:55 AM

Does cloudflare support the cache to prevent call worker everytime?

You asked this in #workers-feature-suggestions. Please try and keep conversations to one channel to avoid confusion for people trying to help.

IIsaac McFadyen > Does cloudflare support the cache to prevent call worker everytime? You asked ...

sodepr•12/2/24, 4:56 AM

Ok, thank you ^^

MMetaSky If I deploy [workerd](https://github.com/cloudflare/workerd) to the server by my...

1984 Ford Laser•12/2/24, 5:31 AM

Im pretty sure the runtime is specifically built to not be able to accurately measure time for functions beyond when I/O occurs

thols•12/2/24, 8:14 AM

Hi guys , new to hono and cloudflare , while implementing rate limit to hono and deploying in cloudflare , i am facing an issue ! this is what i used : https://www.npmjs.com/package/@hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare , and i attached the issue , i am already created a KV and set the namespace id ! the ratelimiting works good in local but not in deployment why , what am i missing ? and also added the kv namespace binding in the CF dashboard

npm

@hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare

. Latest version: 0.2.1, last published: 3 months ago. Start using @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare in your project by running

npm i @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare

npm i @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare

. There is 1 other project in the npm registry using @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare.

Original message was deleted

thols•12/2/24, 8:22 AM

yeah , i think i get it now , but can you pls clarrify this -> for this rate limiting i have to create a KV right , but when i create a KV , it gives the alhpa numeric value which i used in the wrangler.toml file

Original message was deleted

thols•12/2/24, 8:26 AM

oh sry for that , can use pls explain what to do next to implement ratelimiting ? what i done till now is , the local setup - which is working fine ! what to do to make this work in the deployment ?

akashra•12/2/24, 9:34 AM

What is the generally accepted mechanism for having sessions written and looked up when using cloudflare Workers? The solutions I've come across seem to suggest using either KV or D1, but at 1 million and 50m requests or writes/month, of which you would then need at least one for every single worker call, that seems like it could quickly eat in usage.

akashra•12/2/24, 9:44 AM

Ugh, I somehow left out a rather critical/important word from that paragraph lol.

Omar Abid•12/2/24, 9:44 AM

I am trying to figure out the pricing structure of WebSockets and DO. I got WebSockets working on a "normal" worker and say the cost is 3.75GB/s. Now, I pass the WebSocket connection to a DO, for the same time interval, I get billed 0.29GB/s. I am not using Hibernation, yet; so I guess my questions is, is DO priced differently to workers and is this just for WebSockets?

Original message was deleted

akashra•12/2/24, 9:50 AM

Yeah, not for anything more than a tiny amount of data.

akashra•12/2/24, 9:51 AM

I'm not going to use a JWT for strategies like caching data across calls and for session lifespan.

Constantin•12/2/24, 10:18 AM

i'm using

og-img

og-img

lib

however, i'm getting this error:

CompileError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Wasm code generation disallowed by embedder

CompileError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Wasm code generation disallowed by embedder

OOmar Abid I am trying to figure out the pricing structure of WebSockets and DO. I got WebS...

Omar Abid•12/2/24, 10:20 AM

oh the billing happens in the DO itself not the worker

meai1•12/2/24, 1:43 PM

are workers.dev urls sufficiently private or can they be tied back to the account holder somehow? I want to create informational pages for an online community but that community is full of trolls/bad people so I dont want them to know my real info tied to my cloudflare account

Mmeai1 are workers.dev urls sufficiently private or can they be tied back to the accoun...

Hello, I’m Allie!•12/2/24, 2:28 PM

The prefix is tied to your account, so if you use it for anything else, they would be connected

Grifed•12/2/24, 5:41 PM

Hey

, I was wondering if it's possible to set a TTL expiration for objects in an R2 bucket, similar to what we can do with KV? Thanks!

Grifed•12/2/24, 5:47 PM

Got it, thanks for the clarification!

Walshy•12/2/24, 8:29 PM

Not related to Workers

Walshy•12/2/24, 8:30 PM

But there's no fix, it's just simple rate limiting. JDA handles it

Original message was deleted

sodepr•12/2/24, 8:33 PM

I need help

Walshy•12/2/24, 8:46 PM

!ban 1262350034868113469 scam

Flare•12/2/24, 8:46 PM

:zep_check: Banned patrickdavid0390 (Case #2591) (user notified with a direct message)

Hebilicious•12/2/24, 9:21 PM

Hello everyone, if I were to deploy some frontend project to Cloudflare, I would need to choose between Pages and Workers Static Assets. The recommendation are a little bit ambiguous to me, from what I can understand, we can use both and they'll eventually be the same.

But in the meantime, I should prefer Worker Static Assets over Pages, right ?

HHebilicious Hello everyone, if I were to deploy some frontend project to Cloudflare, I would...

Ashley•12/2/24, 9:35 PM

Probably, but there are some Pages-specific features that are not yet availlable for Static Assets (see https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/static-assets/compatibility-matrix/). Generally though, they should converge over time is my understanding.

The difference is nearly tenfold，So I'm wondering if there's been a change in the cpu time calculati

Similar Threads