I don't get that grep though, since it is possible to have versions like 301, 302, etc if the kernel

I don't get that grep though, since it is possible to have versions like 301, 302, etc if the kernel RPM is updated for the same kernel version (although it would be rare)

j0rge•4/17/25, 12:52 PM

j0rge•4/17/25, 12:52 PM

the dip is because the chart is measuring this partial month, which is only the 17th

j0rge•4/17/25, 12:53 PM

but we've been surging since last November

antheas•4/17/25, 1:08 PM

Which orgs is that

j0rge•4/17/25, 1:10 PM

that's all of us put together

j0rge•4/17/25, 1:11 PM

across github, discord, discourse, and the subreddit

GGarcía I don't get that grep though, since it is possible to have versions like 301, 30...

M2•4/17/25, 2:46 PM

Extremely rare. I think in past 3 cycles there has been only a single instance of this.

You can make it more robust. The purpose is to determine the version of coreOS kernel. Then match it in the other releases.

MM2 63 is quite different from before

antheas•4/17/25, 2:47 PM

63 is one of the initial rawhide kernels always

antheas•4/17/25, 2:48 PM

Or 64

inffy•4/17/25, 3:09 PM

looks like the docker packages have been uploaded to the stable repo @Robert

M2•4/17/25, 3:26 PM

Lol right as I added test....

Lumaeris•4/17/25, 4:16 PM

just so y'all know, docker shipped the stable builds for f42 a few hours ago. should no longer block dx builds

Lumaeris•4/17/25, 4:16 PM

I'm not sure it even works yet tho

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:04 PM

https://github.com/Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec

GitHub

GitHub - Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec: Proposal for XDG Default T...

Proposal for XDG Default Terminal Execution Specification and shell-based reference implementation. - Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:04 PM

@Kyle Gospo ubuntu's using this in their latest release, don't know what it means for our terminal stuff so just putting it on your radar

Jj0rge @Kyle Gospo ubuntu's using this in their latest release, don't know what it mean...

Kyle Gospo•4/17/25, 5:21 PM

Nothing yet until gnome and KDE adopt it

Kyle Gospo•4/17/25, 5:21 PM

Just means we'll finally have a standard for changing the default terminal

Kyle Gospo•4/17/25, 5:21 PM

Good change, should be little effort from us when it actually lands

JeremyGraeme•4/17/25, 5:28 PM

Huh, that's interesting, running the just run-iso from the bluefin repo gives an access denied from docker.io/qemux/qemu-docker

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:29 PM

rate limited?

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:29 PM

you probably need to login

JeremyGraeme•4/17/25, 5:30 PM

Oh, I don't have a docker contract/ account

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:31 PM

I didn't know we had docker.io in there, maybe we can pull it from somewhere else

JeremyGraeme•4/17/25, 5:33 PM

Also yeah, just signed up with docker, and it's still access restricted. I'm wondering if we all got rate limited

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:33 PM

are you at work behind a firewall?

JeremyGraeme•4/17/25, 5:34 PM

It's not called qemu-docker anymore , it looks like

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:34 PM

nice

Jj0rge I didn't know we had docker.io in there, maybe we can pull it from somewhere els...

renner•4/17/25, 5:34 PM

they seem to be pushing the same image to

ghcr.io/qemus/qemu
docker.io/qemux/qemu

ghcr.io/qemus/qemu
docker.io/qemux/qemu

JeremyGraeme•4/17/25, 5:35 PM

Or.. maybe something else changed, since that command didn't open the webpage, but instead has it in the terminal

JeremyGraeme•4/17/25, 5:37 PM

Ah.. it throws it to both terminal AND browser

j0rge•4/17/25, 5:52 PM

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/root-mount-options-are-ignored-in-fedora-atomic-desktops-42/148562

Fedora Discussion

Root mount options are ignored in Fedora Atomic Desktops 42

Problem In Fedora Atomic Desktops 42, mount options set in /etc/fstab for the following mount points are ignored: root (/) mount point /proc & /sys mount points, if manually specified (they are not created by default) and listed after the entry for the root mount point All other mount points are processed normally. For the default installati...

antheas•4/17/25, 6:15 PM

what version is fwupd currently on f42?

antheas•4/17/25, 6:15 PM

did we update our fork?

dreamyuki•4/17/25, 6:16 PM

2.0.8-1.fc42
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/fwupd/fwupd/

fwupd - Fedora Packages

View fwupd in the Fedora package repositories. fwupd: Firmware update daemon

dreamyuki•4/17/25, 6:16 PM

j0rge•4/17/25, 6:16 PM

https://github.com/ublue-os/packages/pull/309

GitHub

chore: update fwupd to 2.0.7 by m2Giles · Pull Request #309 · ubl...

fwupd is updated to 2.0.7 in F42.
The specfile is quite different. A lot of build options were removed and the dependencies changed a bit. This build on F40 and F41 (at least using the podman build...

antheas•4/17/25, 6:17 PM

good, legion go s was busted on v1

antheas•4/17/25, 6:17 PM

i enabled its updates again

Jj0rge https://github.com/Vladimir-csp/xdg-terminal-exec

M2•4/17/25, 8:25 PM

Why is this a shell script?

MM2 Why is this a shell script?

tulip•4/17/25, 8:27 PM

im guessing is a reference implementation?

ledif•4/17/25, 9:21 PM

I've been following that XDG Default Terminal spec for a while now and it looked great last time I checked. Hopefully it gets adopted by the DEs

j0rge•4/17/25, 10:37 PM

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-silverblue-rawhide-cant-rebase-back-to-f41/142997/

Fedora Discussion

Fedora Silverblue Rawhide can't rebase back to F41

As of Fedora Rawhide ~2024.01.18, I can’t rebase back to Fedora 41. I don’t have a Fedora 41 deployment to fix that. ❯ journalctl -b -1 -u ostree-finalize-staged.service Jan 21 13:11:15 abc123321bca systemd[1]: Finished ostree-finalize-staged.service - OSTree Finalize Staged Deployment. Jan 21 13:11:37 abc123321bca systemd[1]: Stopping os...

j0rge•4/17/25, 10:37 PM

so I guess with composefs it means that the upgrade to 42 is a one way trip?

Pryka•4/17/25, 10:40 PM

looks like it is more related to sbin and bin merge, or is that somehow related to composefs?

j0rge•4/17/25, 10:41 PM

I have another one

Pryka•4/17/25, 10:42 PM

one way ticket then, i guess?

j0rge•4/17/25, 10:42 PM

oh nevermind it's the same one

j0rge•4/17/25, 10:42 PM

just in the bluefin repo

Jj0rge just in the bluefin repo

Pryka•4/17/25, 10:42 PM

yeah is the same one

I don't get that grep though, since it is possible to have versions like 301, 302, etc if the kernel

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads