maybe try installing to `/sysroot` instead? w/ `/boot/efi` mounted to `/sysroot/boot/efi`?
maybe try installing to
/sysroot instead? w/ /boot/efi mounted to /sysroot/boot/efi?
Tthats so nasty tho i hate editing grub
MYeah. Mkconfig is just a shell script so point it to /sysroot shouldn't be too hard
AWell it's a straight copy from greenboot
AWhich was made to support composefs
ATbh I tested the reconfigure command and it worked
APerhaps probe will still not work and also needs a ujusr
AWe can also do a mod so that probe checks sysroot instead
MPretty sure we just need to modify grub2-mkconfig to tell it that /sysroot is root instead of /
Mit looks for /boot by default and that's in the right spot
Mthough there is a mountpoint in /sysroot for boot
Mit generated a grub.cfg switching / to /sysroot.
MAnd that nuked grub on me and now I need to remove that file
MConfig error
ASo grub mkconfig also needs an edit
MYepp. It's a single line change. But the generated config had a recursion bug on me
ASo is boot read only or did I do a nopp
ANoop
MFor me boot is rw
Arip, well lets keep it if it does not explode, unsure
MCurrently upset that framework doesn't provide an efi-shell
MSo need to find a USB stick to fix my grub
AWhat did you do
APlease tell me before I blow mine up
MI placed the generated grub.cfg as a sourced file from my previous one.
It then sourced it self over and over and blew up
It then sourced it self over and over and blew up
MWas trying to live beside the static grub config
AAlso kind of explains why grub had stale options
Fthis should be upstreamed in Fedora
AWe need to open an issue
MThey want the static grub
AThis needs an if else
MYepp
Alets test it first
MWell fixed my grub. Windows installer does not have an ext4 driver so needed to grab a Linux live ISO....
My laptop not having an EFI shell was annoying since I needed a whole os to remove the offending file
My laptop not having an EFI shell was annoying since I needed a whole os to remove the offending file
Agrub regenerated correctly
Astale entries gonezo
Anow its not hidden anymore
Awhyyyyyy
Abecause the ujust has confusing wording
Afixed
Awhere does the mkconfig issue is supposed to go
Awhat fedora bugtracker
MNo idea
Aso im putting my thinking cap on
JIf there a tracking issue for building Nvidia out of main
Awhy are these issues not blockers
Athey knew about them
DNo idea
DAlmost 1 year and the patch is not submitted upstream or being patched in Fedora grub package
