can we toss this in one of the service packages so we can fix lts and bluefin in one place?
can we toss this in one of the service packages so we can fix lts and bluefin in one place?
JNo idea on aurora, so far looks to be bluefin only?
MThe only thing weird is if a user is truly using dhcp for setting hostnames. I would maybe add a stamp file instead for the conditions check
RDo they not have /etc/hostname files? Or does their
hostnameI would expect
$ hostname to always give the desired name, which is what the %H doesMi have no idea what takes precedence. If /etc/hostname or a transient hostname
Mas in we are making a transient hostname static by writing it to /etc/hostname
RAnd also, since we have no idea what caused it, it could happen again, so something more automated than stampfiles would be ideal
R
TI reported it a few weeks ago, and it came up again last week. I just rebuilt all my ’boxes rather than mess with workarounds.
Jif it's been a few weeks we'd get way more reports wouldn't we?
TEither people are building clean boxes atop 42, or rebuilding like I did, or just not using Distrobox all that much.
T(I doubt the latter, but I include the possibility for completeness.)
TIt's easy to replicate and see via
podman inspect myboxMi think distrobox usage has gone down a bit.
brew + flatpak
brew + flatpak
JI have an issue filed to remove it from non-dx bluefins
Jbut that's more because of boxbuddy, leaving distrobox is fine, it's important
Jbut this new GUI looks promising too
Jbut we can handle that later
JJok so if bazzite is not affected then maybe it's something we did in the packages repo? Something that bluefin and aurora share
R@M2 Which image are you using? Is your personal image based off Bazzite?
Mpersonal image based on bluefin
Mbase bluefin
IThe reports only surfaced after this weeks stable release
Mi'm on an image that was built this morning as well
T
PMine is in place, im on stable-nvidia-dx
P
ISure, only issues on github came yesterday
TJust pointing out that the problem is older than that.
IStable is also on f41 still
TI switched to the beta branch about then for
$REASONS.Jyeah and LTS is centos, so it's something we're all sharing, which is why I suspect the packages repo
RHave there been any confirmations either way for Bazzite DX?
Any Bazzite DX users with that file?
Any Bazzite DX users without that file?
Any Bazzite DX users with that file?
Any Bazzite DX users without that file?
JJno bazzite issues yet afaict
Jchaiqi confirms bazzite-dx has the file
Jwe have not seen a bazzite image with the file missing yet.
JAnd since bazzite isn't centralized, this leads me to believe it's something we're all sharing.
RNone of the changes from the days before 15th look like it could have caused it in the packages repo
Jnone of the packages in the changelog are offering a clue to me
Mi'm fairly certain that anaconda does not create an /etc/hostname by default unless you specify a hostname during install
Joh so do we think it's an installation difference with some people?
Mthat's what I think
PLemme check my terminal history to see if I dabbled with manual hostname setting
PI don't see anything, but there is a change I set it up via gnome settings. Not sure, my install is quite old.
Pyeah looks like I did it at some point
P
Pi think that by default there is no pretty name set.
Pnot sure
