I am using hyperdrive and I just want to clarify something. I'm using hono and then using the variab

..gwapes I am using hyperdrive and I just want to clarify something. I'm using hono and t...

A

AJR•5/14/25, 6:07 PM

It is not strictly necessary, though would be preferred when possible.

AAJR It is not strictly necessary, though would be preferred when possible.

.

.gwapesOP•5/14/25, 6:11 PM

I added a

c.executionCtx.waitUntil(sql.end())

c.executionCtx.waitUntil(sql.end())

c.executionCtx.waitUntil(sql.end())

c.executionCtx.waitUntil(sql.end())

But then got an error that the client was closed or something before the request finished. I can get it again if you would want to see it

How necessary is it to close? What implications does it have if you don't

A

AJR•5/14/25, 6:13 PM

We'll hold the connection open until it times out Idle or the Worker itself disconnects, so it's just a bit of increased resource. Not the end of the world, but at a high enough scale or with particularly long-lived Workers/connections it may pile up enough to start slowing down your requests.

AAJR We'll hold the connection open until it times out Idle or the Worker itself disc...

.

.gwapesOP•5/14/25, 6:15 PM

Ok that makes sense, I remember reading the docs about that type of thing. Where would I add the c.executionCtx.waitUntil(sql.end()) to prevent the client being closed before the request completes?

..gwapes Ok that makes sense, I remember reading the docs about that type of thing. Where...

A

AJR•5/14/25, 6:16 PM

Just at the end of your fetch handler, as late as possible in the Worker's control flow.

Y

Yashu Mittal•5/24/25, 5:37 PM

I want to confirm if I understand this correctly, before i make a mistake by exposing the db publicly.

I have a db running on third-party cloud provider, along with a

cloudflared

cloudflared

cloudflared

cloudflared container in the same network.
Now, from this docs: https://developers.cloudflare.com/hyperdrive/configuration/connect-to-private-database/#12-connect-your-database-using-a-public-hostname

I need to create a public hostname

<random_name>.<my_domain>.com/

<random_name>.<my_domain>.com/

<random_name>.<my_domain>.com/

<random_name>.<my_domain>.com/
and point it to db

mysq://...

mysq://...

mysq://...

mysq://... with TCP type

Question:

If I link my db to make it accessible publicity via endpoint wouldn't anyone access it?
Do I need to enter the db username and password in type TCP url as well?

When I create a hyperdrive configuration, I can see it does ask for the db name, username and password.
Does that mean, that I do not have to add username, password and db name in the tcp url?

A

AJR•5/26/25, 12:36 AM

We can do it for you on request, please feel free to DM.

Making this self-service is a known feature gap, and we do plan to address it. However we have not prioritized it onto our roadmap for the upcoming few months. We do not yet have a committed timeline for when we will deliver this feature.

K

kindaraffy•5/26/25, 12:55 PM

Does anybody else have issues with their drizzle transaction's being complete cache misses? I know hyperdrive struggles to cache transactions, but my transactions are completely independent queries (I have a root transaction carrying individual, child transactions. It's these child transactions I'm expecting to be cached). I'm using

postgres.js

postgres.js

postgres.js

postgres.js and

{prepare: true}

{prepare: true}

{prepare: true}

{prepare: true}. Are transactions known not to work with hyperdrive at all?

I wanted to create a reproducible repo, but I wanted to see if anybody else had this problem.

A

AJR•5/26/25, 1:51 PM

We do not cache any queries conducted within a transaction, by design.

That said, Hyperdrive should be perfectly capable of handling transactions, with all the state correctly handled throughout.

Are you having any issues with things besides caching?

A

AJR•5/26/25, 1:56 PM

As an aside, I genuinely wish the Postgres wire protocol had commit/rollback status encoded into its ReadyForQuery messages. It would make caching tx queries so much less risky.

D

Dylan•5/27/25, 2:05 AM

hello everyone,

i'm having this error that I haven't quite know how to solve yet. it's related to using neon with postgres.js and hyperdrive
i'm trying to set up a connection as follows:

import { Context } from 'hono';
import postgres from 'postgres';

const db = (c: Context) => {
  console.log('Connecting to database...');
  console.log(c.env.HYPERDRIVE.connectionString);

  const connectionString = c.env.HYPERDRIVE?.connectionString;

  return postgres(connectionString, {
    fetch_types: false
  });
};

export default db;

import { Context } from 'hono';
import postgres from 'postgres';

const db = (c: Context) => {
  console.log('Connecting to database...');
  console.log(c.env.HYPERDRIVE.connectionString);

  const connectionString = c.env.HYPERDRIVE?.connectionString;

  return postgres(connectionString, {
    fetch_types: false
  });
};

export default db;

import { Context } from 'hono';
import postgres from 'postgres';

const db = (c: Context) => {
  console.log('Connecting to database...');
  console.log(c.env.HYPERDRIVE.connectionString);

  const connectionString = c.env.HYPERDRIVE?.connectionString;

  return postgres(connectionString, {
    fetch_types: false
  });
};

export default db;

import { Context } from 'hono';
import postgres from 'postgres';

const db = (c: Context) => {
  console.log('Connecting to database...');
  console.log(c.env.HYPERDRIVE.connectionString);

  const connectionString = c.env.HYPERDRIVE?.connectionString;

  return postgres(connectionString, {
    fetch_types: false
  });
};

export default db;

but this is the output that I'm getting in the console:

Connecting to database...
postgresql://neondb_owner:*************@91a7****************d1e4c29.hyperdrive.local:5432/neondb?sslmode=disable
✘ [ERROR] PostgresError: connection is insecure (try using `sslmode=require`)

Connecting to database...
postgresql://neondb_owner:*************@91a7****************d1e4c29.hyperdrive.local:5432/neondb?sslmode=disable
✘ [ERROR] PostgresError: connection is insecure (try using `sslmode=require`)

Connecting to database...
postgresql://neondb_owner:*************@91a7****************d1e4c29.hyperdrive.local:5432/neondb?sslmode=disable
✘ [ERROR] PostgresError: connection is insecure (try using `sslmode=require`)

Connecting to database...
postgresql://neondb_owner:*************@91a7****************d1e4c29.hyperdrive.local:5432/neondb?sslmode=disable
✘ [ERROR] PostgresError: connection is insecure (try using `sslmode=require`)

i'm not sure what I'm supposed to do since the url provided by hyperdrive has sslmode=false.
can anyone point me in the right direction?

AAJR Local dev mode (i.e. `wrangler dev`) does not currently support connecting to re...

D

Dylan•5/27/25, 2:36 AM

oooh this explains it, shouldve joined the discord server sooner.

wrangler dev --remote

wrangler dev --remote

wrangler dev --remote

wrangler dev --remote works perfectly

S

splon•5/28/25, 6:45 PM

Hi, probably a noob question, but I'm connecting to a distant Neon db, and the latencies I'm seeing suggest that my query always takes 2 round trips (350ms latency, while pinging the Neon server takes 150ms and VPNing to a location near the server drops the latency to 50ms). This is even if I just hit Neon a few seconds earlier. I connect using

postgres(connStr, {max: 5, fetch_types: false,})

postgres(connStr, {max: 5, fetch_types: false,})

postgres(connStr, {max: 5, fetch_types: false,})

postgres(connStr, {max: 5, fetch_types: false,}) (not that I need more than one connection but the docs suggested setting max to 5) and I have the cache disabled since the purpose of my query is to catch updates to a counter due to mutations by other clients. My app is not yet publicly released, so there is very little traffic.

Ssplon Hi, probably a noob question, but I'm connecting to a distant Neon db, and the l...

A

AJR•5/28/25, 11:06 PM

postgres.js will often take multiple round trips for a query. For your use case I'd try switching to node-postgres, it should do each of your queries in a single round trip.

AAJR postgres.js will often take multiple round trips for a query. For your use case...

I

Isaac McFadyen•5/29/25, 4:35 AM

that's kinda interesting, any idea why postgres.js does and node-postgres doesn't? I feel like I've seen it mentioned before but don't remember what the reason given was

A

AJR•5/29/25, 1:34 PM

Sure, I can talk through that. It's very "in the weeds" and is definitely the sort of thing we prefer to avoid making our users have to deal with, but I find it interesting.

So all of this has to do with Bind messages (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol-message-formats.html) and how you handle the parameter values for each bound parameter. There are two formats available,

binary

binary

binary

binary and

text

text

text

text. Postgres.js uses the binary format, while node-postgres uses the text format.

Binary format avoids needing text parsing, is smaller on the wire, and can in some scenarios be more precise. However, you generally need to get the actual format codes for each type from the server. To do this, postgres.js structures all new prepared statements (and therefore most new queries), as a Parse-Describe-Flush sequence, which will get back the ParameterDescription containing the binary format codes for each parameter. It then uses that information to construct the Bind message, and sends a followup Bind-Execute-Sync sequence, to get the actual results.

Node-postgres just builds the whole thing in one shot, as a Parse-Bind-Execute-Sync sequence. This pulls back the results in a single round-trip, at the cost of making the origin DB do some extra work handling the Bind message, and with the risk of some loss of precision in types like

float

float

float

float or

timestamp

timestamp

timestamp

timestamp.

Which is most appropriate, as always, depends

PostgreSQL Documentation

53.7. Message Formats

53.7. Message Formats # This section describes the detailed format of each message. Each is marked to indicate that it can …

AAJR Sure, I can talk through that. It's very "in the weeds" and is definitely the so...

I

Isaac McFadyen•5/30/25, 4:44 AM

That's kinda interesting. I assume the overhead is minimal for serverful applications that run all the time but is worse for Hyperdrive? Is that message needed only at driver connection time or for all queries?

TTyveris With Aurora DSQL now generally available, any chance we will get improved Hyperd...

A

AJR•5/30/25, 1:18 PM

That's not currently on our roadmap, but it's something we've kicked around internally a bit.

Ultimately we don't get a lot of requests for it relative to observability/stability/other features, so it's unlikely to happen very soon unless we hear a bunch of people wanting it.

CC @thomasgauvin , in case he has more/different thoughts to share here.

A

AJR•5/30/25, 1:19 PM

That does raise a good question, though.

How many folks around here are using DSQL in anger? How's your experience been, and is it something you'd be particularly interested in having more robust Hyperdrive support for? I haven't heard a ton about it after the initial launch, aside from the official AWS blog posts, and I'd be very curious to know what everyone is seeing about it.

IIsaac McFadyen That's kinda interesting. I assume the overhead is minimal for serverful applica...

A

AJR•5/30/25, 3:04 PM

I think that's more or less correct, the round trips are most punishing for short-lived connections that don't re-use the prepared statement much.

That attribute fetch is needed for each new prepared statement, so if you re-run the same query with different params multiple times you only pay the overhead once. If you run N different extended-protocol queries you'll pay the overhead on each one.

D

dave•5/30/25, 4:06 PM

Still no support for connecting to Hyperdrive from a non-Worker source, right?

Ddave Still no support for connecting to Hyperdrive from a non-Worker source, right?

A

AJR•5/30/25, 4:07 PM

Correct. Though we're actively keeping an eye on cloudchamber and how we can best integrate with it once it's in a good spot to do so, if you count that.

AAJR That does raise a good question, though. How many folks around here are using...

D

dave•5/30/25, 4:12 PM

I was interested in DSQL at first, but IMO sticking "regular" AWS RDS Aurora Serverless v2 is way easier. There's a bunch of extra PostgreSQL features that DSQL doesn't support.

D

dave•5/30/25, 4:16 PM

DSQL also seems like 10x more expensive per query, and 3x more expensive on storage?

Ddave I was interested in DSQL at first, but IMO sticking "regular" AWS RDS Aurora Ser...

D

dave•5/30/25, 4:17 PM

the lack of foreign keys is pretty terrible

D

dave•5/30/25, 4:18 PM

imo the main benefit I see of DSQL over RDS Aurora Serverless v2 is support for public IPv6 lol

A

AJR•5/30/25, 4:20 PM

That all makes sense, thank you!

M

Muhajir•6/1/25, 2:18 AM

Hey folks, I just got this error today

Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries

Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries

Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries

Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries

 (log) 🔍 SQL Query: select `id`, `email`, `name`, `google_id` from `users` where `users`.`email` = ? limit ?
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [ 'muhajirframe@gmail.com', 1 ]
  (log) 🔍 SQL Query: insert into `sessions` (`id`, `user_id`, `expires_at`, `ip_address`, `user_agent`, `payload`, `last_activity`) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [
  'd76a430d62722d6e0bced8540fea85dc1e8d1cfe1dcf2127c1b462bed5f5b070',
  6264,
  '2025-07-01 02:05:50.340',
  '2a09:bac5:3a11:18c8::278:7b',
  'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36',
  '{"userId":6264}',
  1748743550
]
  (error) 02:05:50 ❌ ERROR Google OAuth error
       {
         "error": "Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries",
         "stack": "Error\n    at PromiseConnection.query (server.js:68443:26)\n    at MySql2PreparedQuery.execute (server.js:131993:32)\n    at QueryPromise.execute (server.js:131405:27)\n    at QueryPromise.then (server.js:126940:17)",

 (log) 🔍 SQL Query: select `id`, `email`, `name`, `google_id` from `users` where `users`.`email` = ? limit ?
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [ 'muhajirframe@gmail.com', 1 ]
  (log) 🔍 SQL Query: insert into `sessions` (`id`, `user_id`, `expires_at`, `ip_address`, `user_agent`, `payload`, `last_activity`) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [
  'd76a430d62722d6e0bced8540fea85dc1e8d1cfe1dcf2127c1b462bed5f5b070',
  6264,
  '2025-07-01 02:05:50.340',
  '2a09:bac5:3a11:18c8::278:7b',
  'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36',
  '{"userId":6264}',
  1748743550
]
  (error) 02:05:50 ❌ ERROR Google OAuth error
       {
         "error": "Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries",
         "stack": "Error\n    at PromiseConnection.query (server.js:68443:26)\n    at MySql2PreparedQuery.execute (server.js:131993:32)\n    at QueryPromise.execute (server.js:131405:27)\n    at QueryPromise.then (server.js:126940:17)",

 (log) 🔍 SQL Query: select `id`, `email`, `name`, `google_id` from `users` where `users`.`email` = ? limit ?
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [ 'muhajirframe@gmail.com', 1 ]
  (log) 🔍 SQL Query: insert into `sessions` (`id`, `user_id`, `expires_at`, `ip_address`, `user_agent`, `payload`, `last_activity`) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [
  'd76a430d62722d6e0bced8540fea85dc1e8d1cfe1dcf2127c1b462bed5f5b070',
  6264,
  '2025-07-01 02:05:50.340',
  '2a09:bac5:3a11:18c8::278:7b',
  'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36',
  '{"userId":6264}',
  1748743550
]
  (error) 02:05:50 ❌ ERROR Google OAuth error
       {
         "error": "Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries",
         "stack": "Error\n    at PromiseConnection.query (server.js:68443:26)\n    at MySql2PreparedQuery.execute (server.js:131993:32)\n    at QueryPromise.execute (server.js:131405:27)\n    at QueryPromise.then (server.js:126940:17)",

 (log) 🔍 SQL Query: select `id`, `email`, `name`, `google_id` from `users` where `users`.`email` = ? limit ?
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [ 'muhajirframe@gmail.com', 1 ]
  (log) 🔍 SQL Query: insert into `sessions` (`id`, `user_id`, `expires_at`, `ip_address`, `user_agent`, `payload`, `last_activity`) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
  (log) 📋 Parameters: [
  'd76a430d62722d6e0bced8540fea85dc1e8d1cfe1dcf2127c1b462bed5f5b070',
  6264,
  '2025-07-01 02:05:50.340',
  '2a09:bac5:3a11:18c8::278:7b',
  'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36',
  '{"userId":6264}',
  1748743550
]
  (error) 02:05:50 ❌ ERROR Google OAuth error
       {
         "error": "Hyperdrive does not currently support MySQL multi-statement queries",
         "stack": "Error\n    at PromiseConnection.query (server.js:68443:26)\n    at MySql2PreparedQuery.execute (server.js:131993:32)\n    at QueryPromise.execute (server.js:131405:27)\n    at QueryPromise.then (server.js:126940:17)",

A

ALECKS•6/4/25, 7:34 PM

Does the local wrangler version of hyperdrive behave the same as prod with regards to caching?

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:34 PM

We seem to be having problems with Hyperdrive during high traffic right now, the ID is b0a82a0544c94249a57d9a17611c9455

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:35 PM

Account ID 978f7d8fe0d7c314743586a46e505f14

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:35 PM

Apparently connections are timing out. Maybe we need to increase the max connections to our origin DB? Could someone help us with this?

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:36 PM

Let me take a look

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:39 PM

The connection limit in our origin is around ~900

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:40 PM

So feel free to increase it if thats the problem

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:40 PM

Yep, that's going to be 99% of it, you're on the default 60 still

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:41 PM

Okay, we'll roll out an increase for you with the next release, put you up to 400. That'll give you about 6x the headroom you've had so far, while still keeping under that 900 if you wind up with two pools during high load

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:41 PM

That'll go out by end of next week

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:42 PM

Does that work for you?

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:42 PM

We kinda need this for right now, or website in currently down because of this

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:42 PM

Ah. Okay, let me see what I can do here.

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:42 PM

Sec

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:44 PM

going to start cutting this change now. it's going to go out quick, but will take some time

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:44 PM

I'll keep you posted via DM

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:44 PM

How much time do you think?

A

AJR•6/10/25, 8:45 PM

Can't really do this in <2 hours

J

João Castro•6/10/25, 8:46 PM

Ok, I'll try to create another binding and get connections from both of them instead of just one. Would this work or it limits the pool with the DB id or something like this?

I am using hyperdrive and I just want to clarify something. I'm using hono and then using the variab

Similar Threads