Hey folks (maybe @kian or @Mike Nomitch ) I remember a call some time ago where we discussed some c
Hey folks (maybe @kian or @Mike Nomitch )
I remember a call some time ago where we discussed some caveats whith locations where containers would actually be available/served from v/s their durable objects. (DOs where not co-located with a container. I think that's still the case, and ok by us)
So mostly my question is on the locations where the containers are served from. I think I remember this was written down somewhere? (This was pre public beta , so also could've been some stuff written mid-meeting) But cannot seem to find this.
For context, my company's main product relies on a sync engine. The engine being close to our users is kind of important (not as much as the engine being close to DB, but still)
Back then the locations of containers it was a bit of an issue for us, wanted to reevaluate if we could move out of our current provider.
I remember a call some time ago where we discussed some caveats whith locations where containers would actually be available/served from v/s their durable objects. (DOs where not co-located with a container. I think that's still the case, and ok by us)
So mostly my question is on the locations where the containers are served from. I think I remember this was written down somewhere? (This was pre public beta , so also could've been some stuff written mid-meeting) But cannot seem to find this.
For context, my company's main product relies on a sync engine. The engine being close to our users is kind of important (not as much as the engine being close to DB, but still)
Back then the locations of containers it was a bit of an issue for us, wanted to reevaluate if we could move out of our current provider.
