If by "premium" you mean workers paid, then yes you can do an unlimited number of requests. 10 mill

If by "premium" you mean workers paid, then yes you can do an unlimited number of requests.

10 million requests included + $0.30/million after
30 million cpu milliseconds included + $0.02/million after

Miixms•11/30/23, 8:22 PM

cant i just higher my subscription to not have additional pay

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 8:23 PM

I mean enterprise plans give custom pricing but its not going to be you pay $x for fully unlimited requests and cpu usage afaik

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 8:24 PM

So no you cant pay more for a flat rate there will always be usage based costs

UUnsmart If by "premium" you mean workers paid, then yes you can do an unlimited number o...

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:37 PM

well 10million is not much

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:37 PM

and 0.30/million is getting quick expensive

MMiixms and 0.30/million is getting quick expensive

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:38 PM

Then I would suggest you use a server based approach because $0.30/million is just about the cheapest you will ever get especially since every other platform charges duration a function runs and cloudflare only charges cpu

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:39 PM

for 1.99 a month on a diffrent service i can get unlimited requests

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:40 PM

Which platform? Sounds like a very big lie to me

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:40 PM

well i use cf workers for dns requests

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:41 PM

What do you mean cf workers for dns requests?

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:41 PM

like 1.1.1.1

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:41 PM

but then for yourself

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:41 PM

You mean like cloudflare warp?

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:42 PM

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:42 PM

I mean cloudflare warp is 1.1.1.1 for personal use so what do you mean?

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:42 PM

just 1.1.1.1 only

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:43 PM

warp can be with proxy

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:43 PM

Ok so what about 1.1.1.1 though? Its free for unlimited requests yeah but thats very different from what workers is

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:43 PM

yes

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:43 PM

exactly why workers is expensive for dns product hosting

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:44 PM

what can be used as 1.1.1.1

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:44 PM

You dont use workers for dns though?

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:44 PM

lots of people do

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:44 PM

Do you have an example of this?

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:45 PM

rethinkdns does

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:45 PM

but there are also github packages to launch on cf workers

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:47 PM

Where do you see that rethink does their dns with cloudflare workers though? Their site is hosted on cloudflare sure but that doesnt mean they use workers for dns

UUnsmart Where do you see that rethink does their dns with cloudflare workers though? The...

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:48 PM

check their faq

Original message was deleted

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:50 PM

it can be 11k+ in a hour

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:51 PM

my stats

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:52 PM

Their faq seems to say it just forwards to 1.1.1.1 or you use their fly stuff.

Rethink DNS is both a stub and a recursive resolver-- sky.rethinkdns.com forwards user requests to another recursive resolver like Cloudflare's 1.1.1.1, but does so in a way that doesn't leak the identity of the client (user). Think of it like a proxy resolver that sits in-between a recursive resolver and you, the user.

max.rethinkdns.com, which runs on fly.io is a recursive resolver and does not forward queries, but resolves DNS answers on its own.

But either way cloudflare workers are pretty much the cheapest option that exists for serverless compute. You can get enterprise plans which has custom pricing but no one here will be able to tell you what the pricing will be. If you dont want to pay that much per request then a server based option seems like a good solution for you

UUnsmart Their faq seems to say it just forwards to 1.1.1.1 or you use their fly stuff. >...

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:53 PM

lol, why would i get the enterprise plan for 200eur+ a month, if i can get it for 1.99

Original message was deleted

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:53 PM

devices are not sleeping

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:53 PM

iot

UnsmartOP•11/30/23, 9:54 PM

Then dont use cloudflare workers if you can get something cheaper?

Miixms•11/30/23, 9:54 PM

yes.. but it was worth the try

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:01 AM

switched to the "Smart" placement and immediately started getting 500 errors. switched it back within a minute and it went back to normal. is it expected for our Workers to temporarily stop working when we toggle on Smart placement?

kian•12/1/23, 5:01 AM

Was you tailing the Worker at the time?

Kkian Was you tailing the Worker at the time?

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:02 AM

no but we have Logpush

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:02 AM

there is a bunch of SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON inputSyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input errors

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:03 AM

it looks like where it calls a DO

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:05 AM

you can see where it was enabled and disabled

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:05 AM

its like the Worker was having connection issues with DOs or something

sathoro•12/1/23, 5:06 AM

I shouldn't have enabled it anyways, Smart placement is not good for our Worker because it is too monolithic. will need to split it up or do path-based placements