excuse me ... waht is Workers Constellation

Jjjjrmy excuse me ... waht is Workers Constellation

U

Unsmart•12/27/23, 10:18 PM

That doesn’t exist anymore it’s just #workers-ai-beta now

J

jjjrmyOP•12/27/23, 10:20 PM

oh I saw it in the navigation then dissapear

LLala heyo, i can't access any worker on any browser, does anyone experience the same ...

P

piano1029•12/27/23, 11:46 PM

just had that, clearing cache and refreshing fixed it

P

piano1029•12/27/23, 11:47 PM

the broken update may still be cached in your region, nothing to do except wait

LLala heyo, i can't access any worker on any browser, does anyone experience the same ...

C

Cyb3r-Jak3•12/27/23, 11:47 PM

Seeing some reports of it. It has been raised and being looked into

D

dave•12/28/23, 2:09 AM

Is

cacheKey

cacheKey

cacheKey

cacheKey still an enterprise-only feature?

D

dave•12/28/23, 2:09 AM

Thought it was, but don't see it mentioned in the docs anymore

Kkian `cacheKey` is Enterprise only - if you're referring to `fetch(..., { cf: { cache...

D

dave•12/28/23, 2:12 AM

Is this still the case?

Ddave Is this still the case?

I

Isaac McFadyen•12/28/23, 2:13 AM

As far as I know, yes.

D

dave•12/28/23, 2:13 AM

oh.

I

Isaac McFadyen•12/28/23, 2:15 AM

Yeah, see https://developers.cloudflare.com/cache/how-to/cache-keys/

I

Isaac McFadyen•12/28/23, 2:15 AM

W

Will•12/28/23, 10:02 AM

what happened if I need more than 10ms for my operation?

W

Will•12/28/23, 10:03 AM

let's say 12ms

W

Will•12/28/23, 10:03 AM

I see that my median worker cpu time is 12ms

W

Will•12/28/23, 10:03 AM

but not sure why it's still running, cause I have exceeded the limit

A

Ashley•12/28/23, 11:34 AM

It’s not exact in my experience, I had a worker that would sometimes exceed CPU usage (on the old plans) by 20-30 ms and still “succeed” and some that were 5ms over and fail - the paid plan ($5/month) has a much higher CPU limit per invocation though if you do hit it

E

Erisa•12/28/23, 11:37 AM

The limit is applied quite loosely and doesnt stop execution unless you go over it by a lot or several times. But as a general rule if your median cpu time is above the limit then even if it didn't trigger this time it might in future so its better to get usage down or switch to a paid plan to avoid interruption

E

Erisa•12/28/23, 11:38 AM

Paid plans allow for up to 30 seconds of CPU usage per request, where you pay more if you use more (above the amount you get for $5/mo)

BBram that is good to know, I understand that the binding is identical to `Fetcher` th...

S

schkovich•12/28/23, 1:17 PM

a bit confusing? it's utterly confusing NotLikeThis

Kkian Probably for the best so `new URL(req.url)` doesn't break in Service Bindings/Du...

S

schkovich•12/28/23, 1:23 PM

Thank you for the tip. I think i will opt for cloudflare

documentation URL in this case

V

valkyrie_pilot•12/28/23, 4:41 PM

does cloudflare have a nice solution for OAuth CSRF tokens? I don’t want to use kv, as it’s not really designed for that… can i keep the worker waiting somehow?

U

Unsmart•12/28/23, 4:46 PM

KV is perfectly fine for CSRF tokens

can also use durable objects probably cheaper and faster also

UUnsmart KV is perfectly fine for CSRF tokens 🤷 can also use durable objects probably ch...

V

valkyrie_pilot•12/28/23, 5:01 PM

the main problem is the write pricing

V

valkyrie_pilot•12/28/23, 5:05 PM

Though i was clearly misremembering the pricing, as i thought the free tier was 1000 a month and its 1000 a day

Vvalkyrie_pilot the main problem is the write pricing

U

Unsmart•12/28/23, 5:24 PM

Durable objects are a lot cheaper. $1/million writes + 0.15/million for the invokes. D1 can also be a choice (for non production critical apps currently)

Vvalkyrie_pilot does cloudflare have a nice solution for OAuth CSRF tokens? I don’t want to use ...

D

dave•12/28/23, 5:34 PM

why not D1?

D

dave•12/28/23, 5:44 PM

@kian Is there any downside to storing S3 objects with gzip compression?

UUnsmart Durable objects are a lot cheaper. $1/million writes + 0.15/million for the invo...

V

valkyrie_pilot•12/28/23, 5:47 PM

nah, for my volumes 1000 writes/day is plenty

Ddave Is the Cache API shared among all Workers in a zone?

D

dave•12/28/23, 7:42 PM

Is the Cache API shared with

fetch

fetch

's cache?

Original message was deleted

D

dave•12/28/23, 9:27 PM

if you use aws4fetch, you can get free caching without needing to fiddle with the Cache API manually.

const aws_client = new AwsClient({
  accessKeyId: c.env.S3_ACCESS_KEY_ID,
  secretAccessKey: c.env.S3_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY,
  retries: 0,
  service: "s3",
})

const s3_url = new URL(`${c.env.S3_ENDPOINT}/${sha256}.json`);

const s3_result = await aws_client.fetch(s3_url.toString(), {
  method: "GET",
  cf: {
    cacheEverything: true,
    cacheTtl: 31536000, // 1 year
  }
});

const aws_client = new AwsClient({
  accessKeyId: c.env.S3_ACCESS_KEY_ID,
  secretAccessKey: c.env.S3_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY,
  retries: 0,
  service: "s3",
})

const s3_url = new URL(`${c.env.S3_ENDPOINT}/${sha256}.json`);

const s3_result = await aws_client.fetch(s3_url.toString(), {
  method: "GET",
  cf: {
    cacheEverything: true,
    cacheTtl: 31536000, // 1 year
  }
});

const aws_client = new AwsClient({
  accessKeyId: c.env.S3_ACCESS_KEY_ID,
  secretAccessKey: c.env.S3_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY,
  retries: 0,
  service: "s3",
})

const s3_url = new URL(`${c.env.S3_ENDPOINT}/${sha256}.json`);

const s3_result = await aws_client.fetch(s3_url.toString(), {
  method: "GET",
  cf: {
    cacheEverything: true,
    cacheTtl: 31536000, // 1 year
  }
});

const aws_client = new AwsClient({
  accessKeyId: c.env.S3_ACCESS_KEY_ID,
  secretAccessKey: c.env.S3_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY,
  retries: 0,
  service: "s3",
})

const s3_url = new URL(`${c.env.S3_ENDPOINT}/${sha256}.json`);

const s3_result = await aws_client.fetch(s3_url.toString(), {
  method: "GET",
  cf: {
    cacheEverything: true,
    cacheTtl: 31536000, // 1 year
  }
});

Original message was deleted

D

dave•12/28/23, 9:28 PM

Why?

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:04 PM

Do I pay for the idle time on the setTimeout?

for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000));
    const result = await fetch(loc);
// ...
}

for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000));
    const result = await fetch(loc);
// ...
}

for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000));
    const result = await fetch(loc);
// ...
}

for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000));
    const result = await fetch(loc);
// ...
}

J

James•12/28/23, 11:05 PM

In Unbound, you would pay for that wall time, yes. With Bundled, or the new Standard, no you will not

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:32 PM

thanks!

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:32 PM

I switched to standard just now

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:34 PM

How do I not have enough subrequests for smart placement..?

J

James•12/28/23, 11:50 PM

I'm not sure how accurate those analytics are for smart placement. Are you making multiple subrequests per request?

U

Unsmart•12/28/23, 11:54 PM

Exhibit a of why I hate smart placement instead of manual YEP

JJames I'm not sure how accurate those analytics are for smart placement. Are you makin...

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:57 PM

yes. 3 subrequests if there's no cache, or 0 if we hit the cache.

U

Unsmart•12/28/23, 11:58 PM

I wonder if the cache messes with it

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:58 PM

Will

cacheEverything: true

cacheEverything: true

cacheEverything: true

cacheEverything: true cache non-200 responses?

U

Unsmart•12/28/23, 11:59 PM

It should afaik you can set specific codes to limit the cache

D

dave•12/28/23, 11:59 PM

oh crap

Ddave @kian Is there any downside to storing S3 objects with gzip compression?

K

kian•12/29/23, 12:30 AM

Nope

excuse me ... waht is Workers Constellation

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads