The general public hates anything AI generated being used with a passion, I would avoid using anything AI at all personally. It's a fun toy, but that is it.
Besides, what's the functional difference on training an AI on the styles of other artists vs a human doing it, apart from the AI being faster? That's where that argument kind of falls apart for me. If I personally practice drawing like other artists, and mix those styles to make something, it's somehow fine, but if I write a program to do it, it's suddenly the devil. I feel like most of the arguments against AI generated art are emotional, not logical or reasonable.
Art will just become like luxury cars and hand crafted furniture. Low to mid range will be automated, high end will command high end prices and be a luxury. Can't put the genie back in the bottle, after all.
@Kyle Gospo I have translated the new stuff and added the new secure boot section, however when I'm doing a PR to merge the changes, GitHub wants to PR other older commits that have been already been merged
Artists complains about AI because is taking the personal styles of thousands of artists without any retribution, stealing potential customers and ruining the livelyhood of thousands
When you learn to draw, you develop your own drawing style, something that took hundreds if not thousands of hours to perfect, yeah, you can try and mimic the style of somebody else (rocko edits comes at the top of my head), but again, is somebody that spent a lot of time to perfect, specially if you ask for permission, and you do it as a tribute, that's okay
Sure, but 1) any human could do the same, and 2) this happens with every disruptive new technology. No one needs Ice vendors now that home refrigerators exist, either.
I mean, if we take that argument and expand it, what even are we doing here, collaborating to this project? Just let copilot do all the programming, and an AI to translate everything
we are using the basic creative skills we have to make something, its not about stealing money from artists, we are the artists here, if we had to commission these kind of stuff not only will takes months, will probably costs a lot for a free opensource project
That's still an emotional argument, and doesn't reflect the reality that this tech exists and isn't going to magically vanish. There's a reason SAG-AFTA had to agree to allow AI generated actors, voices, etc, in the latest agreements that ended the strike that industry was having. It's just plain not going to vanish. All this effort spent railing against it existing at all would be better spent figuring out how to transition things to the new reality that creative industries will have to live with.
Correct! They decided that the logo was ugly, and needed a redesign, and so, they used their own time and expertise to design the branding we all agree is great
for an animation is justified, i dont think kyle or jorge want to pay 100+ for each image inside the gif and another 300+ for the animation, we are trying to make the job easier here
Nobody in their right mind would like to spend hundreds of hours collaborating for free to make Bazzite a great OCI based OS... unless there's passion, interest, just saying
yea, and I think that would be great as well. coming up with the promps and tweaking things can also be a bit of an art IMO. all the AI hype has been BS in my opionion its just the new hot thing since crypto fell off the map. where I do find it interesting is use as a tool. Even in coding. saying that AI is going to code an entire application - anyone that says that is kidding themselves. but using "AI" to speed up the workflow of developers that is interesting to me. hell even the term I hate, its just ML rebranded. all the hype, fud and bs around it annoys me and frankly misses the whole point.
dude, i understand what you mean, but its rare that a full ass artist will make it, leave it to us, ai is fine, its not hurting you, and the quality from a real artist is noticeable anyway, the gif images are fine, i wanna use those, they dont have to be 8k res, 3k ppi
My favorite is when I ask GPT for code, it answers with incorrect code with non-existing functions, I point that out, and it apologies and does it again
and if I had the time to play around with some of the AI art stuff I find it cool I could maybe ask the computer to make some graphic for me that I can envision in my head but dont have the skills for. now I could just make a really bitchin color crayon drawing of what im thinking of. that would be good.
My workflow for stuff that needs speed over accuracy is: Sketch image -> AI generate 30 or 40 images using prompts based on my image -> Pick the best -> manually edit and touch up image -> done. It speeds things up massively for me.