nope. I'm doing: 5 subrequests to R2 through the bindings. 5 subrequests to the Cache API 2 subrequ

nope. I'm doing:

5 subrequests to R2 through the bindings.
5 subrequests to the Cache API
2 subrequests to Backblaze B2

If I await between the R2 put's and the Cache API put's, the error goes away.

Ddave nope. I'm doing: 5 subrequests to R2 through the bindings. 5 subrequests to the...

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:14 PM

Might be this?

If the system detects that a Worker is deadlocked on open connections — for example, if the Worker has pending connection attempts but has no in-progress reads or writes on the connections that it already has open — then the least-recently-used open connection will be canceled to unblock the Worker.

If the Worker later attempts to use a canceled connection, an exception will be thrown. These exceptions should rarely occur in practice, though, since it is uncommon for a Worker to open a connection that it does not have an immediate use for.

Otherwise, not sure what it could be

HHello, I’m Allie!*Might* be this? > If the system detects that a Worker is deadlocked on open con...

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:14 PM

I wonder if there's an undocumented limit still for internal subrequests

Ddave I wonder if there's an undocumented limit still for internal subrequests

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:15 PM

I don't think so? Pretty sure I've run 20+ concurrently before

HHello, I’m Allie!*Might* be this? > If the system detects that a Worker is deadlocked on open con...

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:15 PM

wouldn't that be an exception, not a "Too many subrequests"?

Ddave wouldn't that be an exception, not a "Too many subrequests"?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:16 PM

HHello, I’m Allie!I don't think so? Pretty sure I've run 20+ concurrently before

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:16 PM

to the cache api?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:16 PM

I would assume not, but can't be sure just from the dash

Ddave to the cache api?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:16 PM

The Cache API, DOs, KV. 20+ each

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:16 PM

I can try passing it up to see, but otherwise, might be worth a ticket

HHello, I’m Allie!The Cache API, DOs, KV. 20+ each

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:25 PM

huh, weird.

HHello, I’m Allie!The Cache API, DOs, KV. 20+ each

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:27 PM

with the same ReadableStream source?

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:30 PM

for context, what I'm doing, is shoving the same data into five R2 buckets in each region, and also pushing it into the Cache API (so I avoid a Class B completely in even more situations).

Ddave with the same ReadableStream source?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 12:52 PM

No, they were different. Just got a response though, so looks like what you were doing(awaiting them halfway through) is what you are supposed to do

HHello, I’m Allie!No, they were different. Just got a response though, so looks like what you were...

daveOP•4/3/24, 12:52 PM

oh, why is that? I thought this would cause buffering and be bad.

Ddave oh, why is that? I thought this would cause buffering and be bad.

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 1:02 PM

cache.put

cache.put

doesn't actually return anything, just an empty promise. R2 does return an

R2Object

R2Object

, but that doesn't actually include the body. For the two requests to Backblaze, you can call

response.body.cancel()

response.body.cancel()

to ensure they are closed

HHello, I’m Allie!`cache.put` doesn't actually return anything, just an empty promise. R2 does ret...

daveOP•4/3/24, 1:03 PM

I mean buffering of the input

Ddave I mean buffering of the input 🙂

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 1:04 PM

Well, they wouldn't be processed entirely in parallel anyway, since it would only be running half of them at once

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 1:04 PM

So it would already be buffering it somewhere

HHello, I’m Allie!Well, they wouldn't be processed entirely in parallel anyway, since it would onl...

daveOP•4/3/24, 1:05 PM

hm, good point. I guess it'll probably be fine, since I only take in files <100MB

Ddave hm, good point. I guess it'll probably be fine, since I only take in files <100M...

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/3/24, 1:06 PM

Otherwise, you can put it to R2, then pull it back out into Cache. Might be convoluted, but

HHello, I’m Allie!Otherwise, you can put it to R2, then pull it back out into Cache. Might be conv...

daveOP•4/3/24, 1:07 PM

oh I was just optimizing so I never technically have to pull from R2

TravisFrank•4/3/24, 2:07 PM

Is there a way to publish a JSON environment variable via the dashboard? Docs show how to do this in Wrangler but not the dash (https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/configuration/environment-variables/)

Cloudflare Docs

Environment variables · Cloudflare Workers docs

Attach text strings and JSON values as environment variables to your Worker.

daveOP•4/3/24, 4:25 PM

stupid question, how does a Queue decide on it's location?

Frederik•4/3/24, 4:38 PM

in which repo should i raise an issue with

@cloudflare/worker-types

@cloudflare/worker-types

? is it

workers-sdk

workers-sdk

workerd

workerd

kian•4/3/24, 5:04 PM

workerd

safah222•4/3/24, 7:12 PM

Hello guys , I am using cloudflare worker to detect vpn , and I am using

safah222•4/3/24, 7:12 PM

if (request.cf.botManagement.verifiedBot) {
// Logic for handling verified bots
// You can choose to bypass certain operations or handle them differently
return fetch(request);
}
to detect the good bots (( using bots managment system )) how ever its not working , and its not detecting the bots , there are some traffic which got detected by WAF known bots , how ever its not detected by worker , can you help me please

kian•4/3/24, 7:15 PM

You need to be on an Enterprise plan with the Bot Management add-on to use that

safah222•4/3/24, 7:16 PM

what is the other option , I want to detect the known bots by the worker , known bots can be used even in free plan