no worries, next step is MS insists on always on camera for facial recognition, 'for your safety'
no worries, next step is MS insists on always on camera for facial recognition, 'for your safety'
Hthere is also the posibility of remotely tapping into recall without the user knowing it, but it will need to be released first to even be attempted
CThey already have Windows Hello
Hindeed
PThe issue might be quite a bit bigger. Some programs (er ex. banking sites) have their local executables encrypted but Recall effectively circumvents it. Even more, it gives context to actions, and even access to otherwise encrypted files by effectively OCRing what's on screen. From the initial reports I don't have much confidence they'll do it right off the bat and we may see big consequences because of that
PDon't forget this will also have access to information that might otherwise not be saved locally, as an example private cloud documents, chats or even RDP/SSH sessions
CFrom where I stand, it doesn't seem to provide an attack surface that's much bigger than something like ShadowPlay.
PWe'll see how it plays out when it's out, for me it's a bit too big pill to swallow
5I really dont get how MS gets away with this stuff when companies can be so secretive. I work in pharma and we had to come up with a code system to refer to our clients cause some of them didnt like that we had their names on binders and a competitor might see that during an audit. But we'll keep using windows even if its phoning home information and might be recording your whole desktop somewhere
5Like imagine how much more damage that does if someone stole you laptop and had your log in. They wouldnt have to look for anything. They could just ask copilot
PSo we're in the same sector /wave
Not only binders, but in communication (Teams names, emails) and everything.
Not only binders, but in communication (Teams names, emails) and everything.
5Fuck teams
PAlso fuck MS for enforcing a default expiration policy of 3 months for meeting recordings so they can save pennies in onedrive storage costs
Dhow do i uninstall emudeck completly?
5Teams breaks our documents and they were like "we dont intend to fix it". So I have to bitch at people for using it
5You may not be able to
5I'm under the impression you cant just remove something that's layered in. If you do it takes more space
5But you should be able to uninstall it enough so its just the installer
AProtected applications on Android can signal to the OS that screen recording should be disabled
AShould be like that in windows but I'm not a windows user
PI can confirm it's actually a thing, had to make an investigation for a ticket. Combed through EXIF for documents and web apps (including teams) strips some data out when saving documents which are normally present when editing them in the desktop versions of the apps (namely comments and such collaboration features). When externals edited documents in web apps (because the E1 license doesn't provide them with a desktop version of the app) and sent them beack there were differences in the document and truthfully there's nothing you can do apart fom agreeing on using one version and sticking to it if you want consistency
AIn general android has state of the art security
CBluetooth
AI think it's very likely recall won't blindly record the screen but work per windoe
Hbasically, it will be how it always is. Pro version users can use GPEDIT to control it. Home version users will not be able to disable it. remember, with windows, You/Your Information are the payment.
5Which I have to tell people and they don't like it cause it makes them have to do more editing work
ASo even if it's compromised you don't takeover the device
AVPN implementation had a couple issues with dns leakage but that's not that much of a biggie
AVPNs are a pain
PWill see what we'll get at work for new machines but don't think it'll fly wery well with our new CIO
5I used to work for astrazenica. Their computer systems ran like dogshit cause all of their severs were located at their head quarters in Liverpool. They didnt want it to run off the azur cloud or something which would have worked better for people in other countries cause then all their proprietary data would be on MS servers
Its the hypocrisy of it
Its the hypocrisy of it
Mwasn't there a post about vpns kinda just not working in general if your system supports DHCP option 121 ubder some circumstances
MWhich Android seems to ignore that option
PMost of the health providers host in Azure or Oracle, some on AWS and it's always jank. This will raise some big flags for them as it's out of their control and some data will leak this way inevitably, it's the reason why they pushed for cloud workspace in the first place and this negates it completely.
Hif i try to user nvidia-settings to render higher res, then output to 1080 viewport, is that the same as DSR?
AWhere's the hypocrisy
AData governance is what it is
5We trust ms on the desktop but not the server
MIf you actually cared about your data you probably wouldn't be using windows
AIt has to do with where the servers are located
5I guess your right that's its different. Its just seems weird to not use a more secure os at scale
Mnot if you don't trust them for other things, at least
PAaaand that's why we are here in essence
ANow cloud providers like azure are doing per country and dedicated deployments
AGDPR is no joke as well
HMS uses Linux servers. that should say everything that needs to be said (This is from an old conversation and information, but i think still mostly valid)
5we also mostly use web apps anymore. We could stop using windows and still use office
MYou can setup windows servers with azure afaik
Pno you can't because broken formatting 
