package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.0.5, but none of the providers can be installed
package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.0.5, but none of the providers can be installed
cannot install both mesa-filesystem-24.0.9-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates and mesa-filesystem-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
cannot install both mesa-filesystem-24.0.9-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates and mesa-filesystem-24.0.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora
package mesa-dri-drivers-24.0.9-1.fc40.x86_64 from updates requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.0.9-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
ehh... what do you advise? and as I noticed some flatpacks break upon startup
That's a pretty goofy statement. HDR is at its best right now with content meant for TVs like movies and television shows. Stuff like YouTube HDR will always be dependent on the person creating the content because it is not a curated platform
The problem is that you need a screen that actually supports HDR to its fullest, so 800 nits would probably be the minimum peak brightness you can get away with HDR looking correct. Otherwise, things will look overexposed or like vivid mode because its fake hdr displaying on like a 400 nit crappy LCD. I don't know much about what phones consider HDR these days