Meaning every Mac needs yet another compatibility layer because nobody is going to code for metal
Meaning every Mac needs yet another compatibility layer because nobody is going to code for metal
A68K to PPC, PPC to Intel and Intel to ARM
Cbecause that project is embarrassing right now to say the least
KThey are already sponsoring FEX
VPlaytron already did that.
Myou dont understand hideo kojima will keep making metal games
Clast time I saw it could barely run Skyrim
Hyeah that one was straight up hostile, metal has no reason to exist other than to make it harder to get into/out of the ecosystem
KThat's already true with xcode
Hi really doubt apple didnt know about vulkan being in the works considering they're 1 year of age apart
Ayeah because converting x86 code to arm code on the fly for both CPU and GPU is FUCKING HARD
Cthis is not really different than Microsoft pushing their own standard (I know they support Vulkan so it's not the entire same thing)
KThe entire ecosystem is anti-developer as far as I'm concerned
Cthe difference is DirectX is actually good unlike Metal
VYouTubeRGB Tech Official
GTA 5 Windows Termux Box Emulator Gaming Test on Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 or any Android.
Game Size: 71.7GB
v1.4
Settings: 900p, Normal Quality
All preset: Normal
0:00 intro
0:15 Emulator
0:45 Game Test
2:22 Benchmark Test, SD 888 vs SD 8 Gen 2
Phone Specifications:
➤ Model: Samsung Galaxy S23
➤ OS: Android 13, One UI 5.1
Emulation OS: TERMUX BOX ...
Game Size: 71.7GB
v1.4
Settings: 900p, Normal Quality
All preset: Normal
0:00 intro
0:15 Emulator
0:45 Game Test
2:22 Benchmark Test, SD 888 vs SD 8 Gen 2
Phone Specifications:
➤ Model: Samsung Galaxy S23
➤ OS: Android 13, One UI 5.1
Emulation OS: TERMUX BOX ...
Hwindows supports vulkan just fine ??
KLook, one more like this and I'm going to ban you. It's borderline misinformation. Window supports Vulkan
KMicrosoft has done nothing like metal
CI didn't say it like they don't support it
CI meant trying to push their own thing
VPushing your own thing and making it the only thing are very different
AVulkan runs on basically everything at this point
Hthey're not? like
they've used dx since god knows how long
they've used dx since god knows how long
Aexcept I think macOS but correct me if I'm wrong
Hopengl/vulkan has always coexisted with it with no issues
KIt only works on Mac OS via a compatibility layer that converts it to metal
KAnd is missing numerous features
CVulkan is not the default on Windows although it is supported
KIt's also the only operating system like that
Aoh so it's just really bad dxvk
KYeah, twice
CThey push DirectX
Hplaystation and xbox too
VThat's not an OS thing though. It's more reflective of the industry.
Hwell, and ios xd
Kdxvk to Vulkan, multanVK to metal
KBro I heard you liked compatibility layers
Cas someone who has looked at both graphics APIs I do not blame them at all
AOpenGL predates DirectX
CVulkan is insanely complicated
Aby like, a lot
CBut offers the best performance
AVulkan's family tree goes back further than DX's ever did
KIt's roughly the same as DirectX 12, the industry abandoned the whole driver does everything model
AWindows supported OpenGL before it ever supported DX
KVulkan is less a product of OpenGL, it's the modern version of AMD's mantle
AOpenGL first released in 1992.
DirectX? 1995
DirectX? 1995
KWhich debuted with Battlefield IV
Ayeah true it is more of an evolution of Mantle
Abut it has the legacy of the OpenGL team behind it
Awhich is more my point
