I'm using portainer for my whole stack and podman isn't fully supported by portainer yet so that's p
I'm using portainer for my whole stack and podman isn't fully supported by portainer yet so that's pain, or otherwise I would ran off to podman
Mand thanks for it I'm gonna test out some script to add the repo on vm before installing bazzite on my pc
Abtw are you going to game a lot or not? maybe aurora or bluefin is better choice
MI'm gaming a lot that's why I'm picking bazzite I'm on nobara before
Aah, not really an option then
Mimmutable distro is kinda weird to me even after 3 years of using linux, so I guess bazzite easy mode for me to try it
Aim new to immutable distro too, you kinda get used to it overtime
Aublue team does really make it easy for newbie
MWe have a distrobox container to run docker and it will export the socket to the expected location on the host.
No need to layer.
No need to layer.
Moh I just finish my scripts tho with those:
Mactually next question is do distrobox consume more resources in both computing power and space too, I never try them before
Fi wanna run 2 game on 1 game
A
Ai never heard of that? also arent docker in container not recommended?
Mdoes sound possible considering wsl is also a form of docker in distrobox but is it worth it tho
Aafaik they take really minimal resources by themself to be negligible, you only need to worries about application inside it taking resources
Aafaik docker runs in wsl not the other way around
JWsl is actually a proper virtual machine, very optimized and not isolated, but a virtual machine none the less
Ai think wsl is kinda distrobox for windows
Myeah it run a whole vm then with a docker inside it
VYeah, but afaik WSL IS virtualized
Vdistrobox is not
Mis distrobox is more of a native thing
Vyes
JIn some way maybe. Windows NTFS partitions are mounted as network drives and you can run gui apps inside wsl(very poor performance but possible)
Moh
Adistrobox run same kernel as host
VThat's why performance is so good
Awsl can't do it because host is not compatible 
JSemantics aside, WSL2 is very performant
Aalso is this an ujust? or an image?
JBut is extremely limited when comparing with distrobox on linux
Awsl2 is closer to native than regular vm right?
JYea. The virtualisation magic is real with WSL2. It works very good. Docker is, as always, not so fast on windows
Mdoes bazzite come with virt-manager since I need a vm with usb passthrough
JBut WSL2 vm is great
Aujust setup-virtualization
Mthanks
Aujust --choose if you want to see the script inside
VYou need to layer it (with the command asen sent), but it works just fine
JNo flatpak?
VFor virt-manager?
Ayou can't do virtualization with flatpak tho
JYea
JOh
Ai mean the manager maybe? but you need kvm
JMb
JMy noobness is bleeding out can't help it
VGnome Boxes has a flatpak
VNo USB passthrough though
