without disclosing i cant, there is a search bar, look for worker routes
without disclosing i cant, there is a search bar, look for worker routes
II understand. Thank you.
ACan Worker / Functions be made to send email using a self hosted SMTP server ?
I want to be able to send contact form submission emails for a Pages site.
I want to be able to send contact form submission emails for a Pages site.
BHow do functions work in terms of modules/bundling? Are your functions in a project effectively bundled into a giant script, and effectively is just the same as workers? Can you use npm packages in functions?
Wyes and yes
BHow are routing handled at runtime then, does it mean the bundled worker has some built-in routing code?
Wyup
Wif you look at the build output you can see it or look at the code: https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/blob/97110195a751dae70128fb892cb2fb86f6d94470/packages/wrangler/src/pages/functions/routes.ts
BI'm wondering if it's better to do my backend as a pages project using functions, or a regular worker
BRouting libraries like Hono do things like generating some special data structure so looking up the route gets faster, but that's irrelevant for workers since IIRC requests will rarely hit the same machine twice, so all those work are just unnecessary overhead.
Wthey can hit same metals twice but reducing from less than a millisecond to even less than a millisecond is very inconsequential, the rest of your code will be far far slower than routing ever is
Wpick what makes more sense for you, hono is great, functions default stuff is great, itty-router is great, lots of things you can use
better to prioritise what makes sense from a dx/usability prospective than worry about micro-optimisations in perf
better to prioritise what makes sense from a dx/usability prospective than worry about micro-optimisations in perf
BI was also thinking about the cost of including library's code which needs to be parsed and run, and well a dependency is a dependency you need to maintain. But I see your point.
RAre my API functions being scanned?
Im looking out the Real time logs for my pages functions and i see random api calls to endpoints that do not exisit such as:
/api/liferay
/api/users/admin/check
so many other randoms..
and despite not having any functions there, cloudflare returns a 200 OK?
are these cloudflare pings? or what are they?
my guess is that all routes to /api/* are allowed but if function does not exist it should block or not pass through...
any help much appreicated
Im looking out the Real time logs for my pages functions and i see random api calls to endpoints that do not exisit such as:
/api/liferay
/api/users/admin/check
so many other randoms..
and despite not having any functions there, cloudflare returns a 200 OK?
are these cloudflare pings? or what are they?
my guess is that all routes to /api/* are allowed but if function does not exist it should block or not pass through...
any help much appreicated
Rthe User-agent seems normal
And the json for the botsManagment shows as :
And the json for the botsManagment shows as :
"botManagement": {
"corporateProxy": false,
"verifiedBot": false,
"jsDetection": {
"passed": false
},
"staticResource": false,
"detectionIds": {},
"score": 99
}
}
},
"response": {
"status": 200Rshouldn't it return a 404 at the very least, or have no response if the route doesn't exisit
Rseems to be coming from : "asOrganization": "Amazon.com",
ICheck if you have a 404.html. If not then Pages will assume SPA mode and will always serve an index.html even for not found routes.
Hhi
H
Hon my main domain ı cant update the list even ı do its not works but if ı try on backup domain its works fine
HDNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN
I:raised_eyebrow_cat:
They, really quick, can I run page functions in python, or does it have to be with js/ts?
JThe documentation says this regarding switching from fail close/fail open for a cf function:
J
JThere is literally no place inside of a project to change this setting anywhere
JI checked workers routes under domains to see if the cloudflare function would be present there for this domain and its not. Not sure if a lot of additional config needs to happen but the cf function is currently up and running
JI'll follow up on my old message lol -- I can't see fail closed under Workers Routes, or any worker even available under workers routes, because we're using cf functions which technically isn't an isolated worker?
I can add the route but it doesn't matter since worker is none regardless -- theres nothing to match to it and indicate whether to fial open/fail close
I can add the route but it doesn't matter since worker is none regardless -- theres nothing to match to it and indicate whether to fial open/fail close
KEach flavor has their perks/focus!
KThis right here... lotta folks wasting time on optimizing a near-zero to even nearer-zero (every mainstream router) instead of their code that is the real slowdown, haha
Pick the router that fits your vibe/needs and don't look back [until much later]
Pick the router that fits your vibe/needs and don't look back [until much later]
CWhats the real difference between workers and functions
Wfunctions are just workers underneath so not much
Wfunctions are just nicely packaged with workers and have their own file based routing system
CAny limitations of one vs. the other?
Wfunctions usually lags behind a bit in terms of features due to the way it's implemented (e.g. newer bindings will take longer to be supported, logpush and other things like that aren't supported)
Wbut otherwise, functionally the same limitations
CGot it, thank you 
Ron a pages project using Wrangler, if u put mode = smart it doesnt do anything, h aveto change it in the dashboar
Rbut the docs say
to put it at the highest level like pages_build_output_dir but that throws an error so idk, any ideas?
to put it at the highest level like pages_build_output_dir but that throws an error so idk, any ideas?
MHi, I'm trying to build a full-stack application with Pages and Functions. My framework is Angular. I've added a functions folder, and I have a single route currently, however when I send a request to that route it returns the Angular app HTML rather than the expected response.
Any ideas?
Any ideas?
MHello! I’m currently trying to make an ab-test with a pages function. I'm using a next js static site (SSG) but can't get it to work. Has anyone done this before and gotten it to work? With either a static or a SSR site? I’ve been following this guide: https://developers.cloudflare.com/pages/functions/examples/ab-testing/.
AHi I have a question, I'm using vite with functions, to run localy using wrangler pages dev command, is always run the vite build first?
RDATASTAR looks interesting, a small framework.. i am sure it can be run in a function itself, --- but isn't it a client side framework , not server side rendering.
Ryou need to build first, then run npx wrangler pages dev ./dist (output folder)
AHey guys, is there a way to use wrangler's unstable_dev with functions?
AI'm trying to create a Gatsby plugin that proxies functions to make them available for local development
AIf possible I'd like to avoid running wrangler using
child_process