![Rat Rig Community [Unofficial]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/icons/582187371529764864/08375bea6b5b9088b6d4cfc2b6e25fba.webp?size=48){kind=icon}
Orbitool Accelorometer vs Beacon Accelorometer
I was struggling big time with resonance graphs generated with Orbitool O2 on my newly upgraded toolhead (I also upgraded from EBB42 to Orbitool O2).
The graphs looked horrible for the y-axis and suggested 2900 as max acceleration - see attached images. After changing to use beacon as accelorometer the suggested max acceleration went up to 55300, and the graph looked super clean.
Now can anyone tell me if that is a reliable result? I am not setting accelerations to that value, since the lowest was the x axis with 12400. But the difference in resonance is night and day. Super noisy vs. super clean.
The graphs looked horrible for the y-axis and suggested 2900 as max acceleration - see attached images. After changing to use beacon as accelorometer the suggested max acceleration went up to 55300, and the graph looked super clean.
Now can anyone tell me if that is a reliable result? I am not setting accelerations to that value, since the lowest was the x axis with 12400. But the difference in resonance is night and day. Super noisy vs. super clean.
![Rat Rig Community [Unofficial] banner](https://cdn.discordapp.com/banners/582187371529764864/4ee3e42e227d6aac26f048a3e69d5924.webp?size=480)
![Rat Rig Community [Unofficial]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/icons/582187371529764864/08375bea6b5b9088b6d4cfc2b6e25fba.webp?size=16){kind=icon}