AWe generally don't put out dates in advance of releases. That tends to make nobody happy.
It's being actively worked on, though.
It's being actively worked on, though.
OOkay, good for me, thanks 
SCan you connect hyperdrive to a digital ocean managed postgres db or is the IP range still not allowed?
ASorry, not sure I understand the question.
Hyperdrive doesn't refuse to egress to DO ranges. Is there an issue with ingressing to DO from the shared pool?
Hyperdrive doesn't refuse to egress to DO ranges. Is there an issue with ingressing to DO from the shared pool?
SHey thanks for reply on this. Yes when I try to setup hyperdrive + a managed DO database in cf dashboard it errors
I have setup connections with supabase in the past successfully and I searched this channel for issues with DO leading me to believe it’s with DO ip range?
I have setup connections with supabase in the past successfully and I searched this channel for issues with DO leading me to believe it’s with DO ip range?
AInteresting. I searched and you're right, TCP connect from workers to DO seems to have some issues.
I'm not sure if it's due to the shared address range or not, though.
I'll check Monday with my teammate who's working on the migration to the CF IP ranges and see if we have a way to test if DO cooperates with those. I'd be curious to know, honestly
I'm not sure if it's due to the shared address range or not, though.
I'll check Monday with my teammate who's working on the migration to the CF IP ranges and see if we have a way to test if DO cooperates with those. I'd be curious to know, honestly
SI have digital ocean and azure credits to burn and the latter seem to be priced crazily so would be ideal! 
Maybe if there is no solution with public there is one with private connection?
I’d be open to using d1 instead also but I have about 50gb of data already so I don’t know if limits can be increased to say 100gb (for future scale)
Also happy to discuss using r2 as this is mostly a primary store of library like data with reads being carried out from my typesense instance.
I am on CF startups program also
Maybe if there is no solution with public there is one with private connection?
I’d be open to using d1 instead also but I have about 50gb of data already so I don’t know if limits can be increased to say 100gb (for future scale)
Also happy to discuss using r2 as this is mostly a primary store of library like data with reads being carried out from my typesense instance.
I am on CF startups program also
AFYI @thomasgauvin ^
Might be in a better spot to address what will fit your use case best.
Might be in a better spot to address what will fit your use case best.
SHey,
I am not sure what Hyperdrive is, but does this make it possible to have a database being hidden behind the Cloudflare Network?
I am not sure what Hyperdrive is, but does this make it possible to have a database being hidden behind the Cloudflare Network?
AYes. Our tunnel integration does exactly that.
SI want to hide my database behind Cloudflare's Network without needing to have the 
Is that what Hyperdrive fixes?
Cloudflared application on all devices.. Is that what Hyperdrive fixes?
AHyperdrive is a way to talk from Workers to a centralized database. We integrate with tunnels too so you'd only need have cloudflared running once somewhere within your vpc to egress the traffic to your DB from.
Based on your questions I'm assuming you're not running your application on Workers?
Based on your questions I'm assuming you're not running your application on Workers?
SNo I am not..
AOkay. This is another interesting use case for non-workers ingress for us. I'll mention this over to our product folks.
AFor now though, Hyperdrive probably isn't going to be a lot of help for your use case, I'm afraid.
SAlright, thanks tho for the help 
SSweet thank you, let me know on the digital ocean stuff when back into the office just to get a firm answer if possible vs not.
Then I can explore alternatives if its a definite no!
Happy to speak to @thomasgauvin also. As exploring alternatives is totally fine too.
Then I can explore alternatives if its a definite no!
Happy to speak to @thomasgauvin
also. As exploring alternatives is totally fine too.
NIs Hyperdrive on the Cloudflare IP range? (So we can whitelist those)
DYou could probably use cloudflared just fine
ITLDR: not yet.
TThis is correct, Hyperdrive is not on Cloudflare's IP range @Nick
JAre there any plans for supporting custom connection limits per region? Right now we seem to be hitting that limit and losing performance by being routed to a nearby region.
AWe're moving away from regional pooling, which should dramatically improve that without the additional config needed
APost your Hyperdrive ID and I'll enroll you early, we're still teeing up the migration for everyone
J707875b010bc457e9a80dfddb19ef919
JThanks!
JThis was created recently btw, so not sure if it already has the new version
AJust cut over for new configs last week, so it'd depend
Alet me check
AAh yeah, you're already on global pools
AMoving to thread
DIt is on CF’s ASN though iirc?
HIIRC it is on a CF ASN, but not the CF ASN
DAhhh… I definitely missed that.
S
Hello~ I was reading about hyperdrive, and wanted to confirm something: is hyperdrive ONLY for accessing a database from workers, or can it be used for connecting from other type of distributed applications (that aren't hosted on Cloudflare?).I assume the answer is "nope, sorry!", since it looks like Hyperdrive operates as a worker binding, but just want to confirm.
AYes, that is correct. We've kicked around opening it up more, but have not committed to that yet. Hyperdrive operates as a standalone service, so it is technically possible, though would take some work.
If you're willing to discuss your use case a bit, it'd help us as we evaluate.
If you're willing to discuss your use case a bit, it'd help us as we evaluate.
D@AJR Hmm, I think I may have found a pretty bad bug. When you reconnect, are you doing a fresh DNS lookup, or are you maybe accidentally using a cached entry?
LHi, combining Hyperdrive with Neon, which connection strings is the recommended? With pool o without it?
DNeon suggestions without the pooler.
https://neon.tech/docs/guides/cloudflare-hyperdrive#retrieve-your-neon-database-connection-string
Cloudflare suggests with the pooler.
https://developers.cloudflare.com/hyperdrive/examples/neon/#neon-dashboard
https://neon.tech/docs/guides/cloudflare-hyperdrive#retrieve-your-neon-database-connection-string
Cloudflare suggests with the pooler.
https://developers.cloudflare.com/hyperdrive/examples/neon/#neon-dashboard
LI'm testing with pooler, but I'm get an error: "Connection terminated unexpectedly" on stress test. My next test will be without.... thanks!
Dtbh I've found Neon very unreliable in the past with connections.
LYes, I'm discover stranger things on stress scenarios.
AI, personally, think without the pooler will be a better experience
D@AJR As a sanity check, when I use the patch API, what happens to existing connections?
AIn most scenarios, a new pool will be created when you send traffic after the PATCH change to your configuration, and the existing connections will idle and then time out.
Dah dang, so that would deal with if the database password was expiring (since it would trigger a disconnect on the old pools), but wouldn't be useful for @AJR Hmm, I _think_ I _may_ have found a sadly
LHi, I'm working with Drizzle (node-postgres) + Hyperdrive + Neon, I'm trying with/without pooler's connection string and with/without SSL required in connection string... but, sometimes I receive an error: Connection terminated unexpectedly ... any ideas?
LI try with node-postgress pool configuration like: min = 0, idleTimeout=0, etc...
The error appears on stress scenarios (500 request in 10 seconds)
The error appears on stress scenarios (500 request in 10 seconds)
