No, out of the box we don't do that name conversion for you with the current D1 binding.
No, out of the box we don't do that name conversion for you with the current D1 binding.
MIs it worth a feature request? (like the Drizzle example)
BThis is probably something better done in user land.
NHi folks! We are looking to use D1 for a multi tenant application. We are looking to ways to keep d1 databases isolated at a tenant level. Right now the only limitation I see is that bindings are static, is there any way to dynamically bind to my d1 instances? Or any other recommendation on how to achieve this?
IProbably not, D1 is SQLite and SQLite doesn't perform any inspection of the query itself because it's intended as a raw SQL executor. Adding this behavior would require adding non-standard parsing in front of SQLite.
XIt's what all these BI tools let you do
GIs there a place I can accuratly see how many reads/writes I have done in a billing period? The billing section says I have done 0 which is very much not true, although if you want to leave it that way for calculating billing I'm ok with it 
Sno, they don't. they generate SQL from sanitized user input, they don't use raw input as the query
VHey folks, what is D1's current limit for requests per second for paid accounts? I found this response but not sure if it applies. d1-database
VI'm working on a ticket service with high surge potential and I need to let my customers know.
IThat applies, yup.
IIf you need more performance/capacity you'll need to shard across multiple DBs.
Mis there a recommenday way to get better ux on the d1. new to cf and sqlite. the webgui is very basic. is there any recomendation?
do i just get local replicate and even then what is a good viewer for the db
do i just get local replicate and even then what is a good viewer for the db
LYou can use https://www.outerbase.com/blog/now-supporting-cloudflare-d1/ although I haven't personally tested it, but saw happy users before.
Mnot bad was very easy to setup and much better ux. should be ok for now thx.
Sam i the only one that just sqlite3s the db file inside .wrangler? 
BThe docs say this:
But AFAICT this guidance is purely theoretical as there's no way to actually do the sharding?
Each D1 database can store up to 10 GB of data, and you can create up to thousands of separate D1 databases. This allows you to split a single monolithic database into multiple, smaller databases, thereby isolating application data by user, customer, or tenant
But AFAICT this guidance is purely theoretical as there's no way to actually do the sharding?
BIs there something obvious I'm missing?
BLike I can shard into a fixed pool of databases but certainly not per customer / tenant. And the number of bindings to manage grows quite severely with a larger number of shards.
K wth is happening here?Why is D1 unable to fulfill standard queries?
Explanation: I got a Unix timestamp and convert it via the
DATETIMEAnd time created_at column is of the type
timestamp
BTry datetime(crated_at, 'unixepoch') < datetime(<value>, 'unixepoch')?
HIIRC the current recommendation is to use SQLiteDOs
HDon't know whether that's the "official" thing or not
BDo SQLite DOs have the migration utilities that D1 does?
KThat results in no data being returned at all
I found out this bug only happens if I have the order by included in the query. If I leave it out the filtering works as I expect it too
I found out this bug only happens if I have the order by included in the query. If I leave it out the filtering works as I expect it too
BI'm pretty sure datetime converts into a string and you're trying to compare a number in the string in the first place and lexicographical strings in the second. Bad advice on my part - just omit the datetime altogether
BYou actually want unixepoch(created_at) < 1743526055
BYou should try out your queries in normal sqlite - I would be very surprised if the results differ from what cloudflare returns
HLike, via the CLI?
HIf that's the question, then no
KNever mind its all my fault
HIf you use an ORM, there is some tooling to make it a bit smoother
K<>
SHey, wondering if anyone here has any tips or experience with this. Cloudflare charged my credit card a huge amount and I haven’t gotten a proper explanation from them, even after reaching out to support multiple times over the past two months. All I’ve gotten are generic “we’re looking into it” replies.
It’s gotten to the point where I can’t afford to pay the credit card bill, and it’s messing with rent and other important stuff. Has anyone had luck actually getting a real response from Cloudflare support? Or escalated it somehow?
And has anyone ever done a chargeback with Cloudflare? I’m seriously considering it because I don’t know what else to do.
It’s gotten to the point where I can’t afford to pay the credit card bill, and it’s messing with rent and other important stuff. Has anyone had luck actually getting a real response from Cloudflare support? Or escalated it somehow?
And has anyone ever done a chargeback with Cloudflare? I’m seriously considering it because I don’t know what else to do.
AI have this same question (d1-database). Are dynamic bindings coming anytime soon, or has anyone found a usable pattern within Cloudflare to dynamically select a database at runtime?
BYou can achieve dynamic SQLite databases with durable objects if that works for your use case, but dynamic bindings aren't avaialble afaik
KCloudflare API to create the database and a D1 worker as an API with the binding. Then drizzle proxy to the api. Once setup, it works and I get to keep D1 batteries included and continue to use drizzle as well. Not pretty but it works.
LIf you need to shard across tens thousands (or more) databases, please use SQLite DOs. Even if D1 ships dynamic bindings, it's not happening in just a few weeks. Use DOs that provide that scalability already.
The underlying SQLite features are identical.
The underlying SQLite features are identical.
Sis there a good example of this? at the end of the day you still need to bind the DO or am i forgetting something? running wrangler d1 create dosent seem like the issue to me personally
LYou only bind the DO namespace once, and create millions of Durable Object instances. With D1, you need to create each one individually and add it in your wrangler config and redeploy.
Swell yea with the downside of needing to run migrations on every Do invocation because you cant know if its a new do/db right? at least thats what i did with my DO better-auth example
LYou do know if you check the storage and keep in memory while your DO is alive. Not sure why you would run your migrations all the time. All SQL schema tools/libraries record what migrations they already ran and don't do anything if there is nothing new.
Shttps://github.com/Sillyvan/better-auth-do-example/blob/main/src/server.ts
id still assume something like this brings a bit of overhead? but its not too big of a deal of course!
id still assume something like this brings a bit of overhead? but its not too big of a deal of course!
GitHub
Contribute to Sillyvan/better-auth-do-example development by creating an account on GitHub.
AI appreciate the response! Does this mean that for the tenant DBs we would have different DOs for each one, but we would only have to use one binding somehow?
AForgive me if it's a dumb question, I haven't really used DOs but we have used D1 extensively
BYou could do something like the following for example where you have one Durable Object class in your wrangler binding (e.g. MY_DURABLE_OBJECT) but when you do the
So above I could change
idFromName you can pass something specific to the tenant you want. Each unique idSo above I could change
user_1 to be any of my users and I'd be routed to their specific DO instance.
AThat's helpful, thank you!!
LTake a look into https://developers.cloudflare.com/reference-architecture/diagrams/storage/durable-object-control-data-plane-pattern/ as well.
Cloudflare Docs
Durable Objects are built on-top of Cloudflare Workers spanning several locations across our global infrastructure network.
Each Durable Object instance has its own durable storage persisted across requests, in-memory state, single-threaded execution, and can be placed in a specific region.
Each Durable Object instance has its own durable storage persisted across requests, in-memory state, single-threaded execution, and can be placed in a specific region.
CWhy I'm getting database disk image is malformed: SQLITE_CORRUPT [code: 7500]
