No. it only increases # of scripts, #of requests, and cpu time https://developers.cloudflare.com/clo

No. it only increases # of scripts, #of requests, and cpu time https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-for-platforms/workers-for-platforms/platform/pricing/

Benro•6/2/25, 8:55 PM

Hey there!

Can i not access version history/prev deployments of a worker/script deployed to a dispatch-namespace in workers for platform? I do not see any versioning APIs, nor cannot access via UI.

Ddarkpool No. it only increases # of scripts, #of requests, and cpu time https://developer...

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 2:12 AM

this is so well priced I'm almost wondering what the catch is

or maybe I'm just too used to AWS..

RRafflesia this is so well priced I'm almost wondering what the catch is or maybe I'm jus...

Unsmart•6/4/25, 2:28 AM

No catch really but you do want to limit script usage as that can add up if you let users create 100s of tiny scripts. Gotta like mash all em up to one bigger script on the upload side so u save

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 2:30 AM

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 2:36 AM

so to start deploying scripts I can literally just send a PUT to

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/${process.env.ACCOUNT}/workers/scripts/${"worker-name"}/content

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/${process.env.ACCOUNT}/workers/scripts/${"worker-name"}/content

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 2:39 AM

or does that only work for "non platform" workers

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 2:41 AM

oh its

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/$ACCOUNT_ID/workers/dispatch/namespaces/$DISPATCH_NAMESPACE/scripts/$SCRIPT_NAME/content

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/$ACCOUNT_ID/workers/dispatch/namespaces/$DISPATCH_NAMESPACE/scripts/$SCRIPT_NAME/content

instead

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 2:44 AM

does that also create the worker or does it only work if the worker already exists though

RRafflesia does that also create the worker or does it only work if the worker already exis...

darkpoolOP•6/4/25, 2:19 PM

for uploading entire user worker use https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/workers_for_platforms/subresources/dispatch/subresources/namespaces/subresources/scripts/methods/update/

which accepts multi part form data so modules, assets, bindings, etc.

PUT script content is just for updating the JS.

Rafflesia•6/4/25, 5:00 PM

Gotcha

christianklotz•6/5/25, 8:55 AM

Can user workers define their own durable objects, e.g.

class UserDurableObject extends DurableObject<Env>

class UserDurableObject extends DurableObject<Env>

?

For instance, what if I wanted a user worker to receive emails. A standard worker would define an

send_email

send_email

binding. What would a secure setup look like where the email goes through the dispatch worker, and for any user worker supporting email, it would pass it on to be handled by the user worker?

Cchristianklotz Can user workers define their own durable objects, e.g. `class UserDurableObject...

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 2:39 PM

not sure about DO support since I have not tested it but if you want to pass params from dispatch to user worker you can do it via RPC. User workers can also have bindings to other (non-user) workers so if you had a tools worker with sendEmail method, your user worker could bind to it.

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 2:40 PM

I'm waiting on workflows support. I was recently told that it should work with WPF but they need to fix something so I assume DO will work too but have not tested it yet.

Ddarkpool not sure about DO support since I have not tested it but if you want to pass par...

christianklotz•6/5/25, 2:50 PM

Thank you! I saw the RPC stuff too. The bottom line is that user workers then always would have to be slightly different than 'regular' workers? I'm still trying to wrap my head around how user workers would have to be written differently.

Ddarkpool I'm waiting on workflows support. I was recently told that it should work with W...

christianklotz•6/5/25, 2:51 PM

Oh, I thought workflows were working on WfP?

Cchristianklotz Thank you! I saw the RPC stuff too. The bottom line is that user workers then al...

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 2:58 PM

Np. It took me a while to wrap my head around it too. Basically the only difference is how they're invoked. So a regular worker can't RPC a user worker, only a dispatch worker can. However, a user worker can RPC a regular worker directly. The docs dont show this but RPC does work

Cchristianklotz Oh, I thought workflows were working on WfP?

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 2:59 PM

not yet: workflowsI can't even get the [example](https://

demotime•6/5/25, 3:11 PM

hi all. I was trying to get workers for platforms working, but following the tutorial I couldn't get localdev setup. Does that tutorial still work?
Couldn't find

wrangler dev

wrangler dev

session for "customer-worker-1" in namespace "test" to proxy to

here's the wrangler config for the user-worker:

demotime•6/5/25, 3:11 PM

obviously there's a linter error there (why I screenshotted) - but that is what the tutorial says to do

demotime•6/5/25, 8:02 PM

Your Worker has access to the following bindings:

Durable Objects:
- MAIN_RUN_DO: MainRunObject
KV Namespaces:
- SEND_PROTECT: e5010ba5c178462a8ca7f227d7efa494 [simulated locally]
Dispatch Namespaces:
- DISPATCH_NAMESPACE: test [connected to remote resource]

But when trying to actually run the worker:
Couldn't find

wrangler dev

wrangler dev

session for "customer-worker-1" in namespace "test" to proxy to

Ddemotime Your Worker has access to the following bindings: ...

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 8:19 PM

are you using?

npx wrangler@dispatch-namespaces-dev

npx wrangler@dispatch-namespaces-dev

to start user and dispatch workers?

demotime•6/5/25, 8:19 PM

yes

Ddarkpool are you using? `npx wrangler@dispatch-namespaces-dev` to start user and dispatch...

demotime•6/5/25, 8:20 PM

yes, i was just about to experiment with a globally installed version

Ddemotime yes, i was just about to experiment with a globally installed version

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 8:22 PM

are you using wrangler.toml?

Ddarkpool are you using wrangler.toml?

demotime•6/5/25, 8:23 PM

wrangler.jsonc

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 8:27 PM

when I setup local dev a few months ago jsonc did not work. Not sure if that's changed. I made a bug report https://github.com/issues/created?issue=cloudflare%7Ccloudflare-docs%7C21037

demotime•6/5/25, 8:28 PM

ok, will try that. thanks

darkpoolOP•6/5/25, 8:33 PM

also maybe try restarting machine. I forgot I was running into same issue a when i set it up lol workers-for-platforms

demotime•6/5/25, 8:52 PM

thanks for the help. unfortunately i tried globally installing wrangler, npx wrangler, running it direct from CLI etc. and all permutations failed. also tried replacing .jsonc with .toml
i don't know if there's any debugging steps available for wrangler

demotime•6/5/25, 8:54 PM

ok wow the restart seemed to help (even though the processes were restarted many, many times) - thank you @darkpool

demotime•6/5/25, 8:59 PM

does anyone know if we can pair a local dispatch worker with a remote/deployed userscript

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 9:49 PM

Hey guys I also have a similar issue but not sure where to fix it tbh

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 9:49 PM

I'm following the https://github.com/upstash/examples/blob/main/examples/cloudflare-websockets example code!

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:02 PM

Can i still use a key-value store in free plan ?

IIbby | Fk Israel Can i still use a key-value store in free plan ?

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:05 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/kv/platform/limits/ Yes, up to a certain quota.

IIsaac McFadyen <https://developers.cloudflare.com/kv/platform/limits/> Yes, up to a certain quo...

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:07 PM

Yeah but I’m getting that 10097 error! I just changed the class_name from the example repo. I’ll make sure it’s the same elsewhere as well

IIbby | Fk Israel Yeah but I’m getting that 10097 error! I just changed the class_name from the ex...

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

Oh, do you mean DO KV?

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

You can use DO KV, but you have to add a migration to your wrangler.toml/wrangler.jsonc file. Can you show what you have currently?

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

Well it’s the Upstash redis that I’m trying to use. Same thing used in the example repo

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

Absolutely

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:09 PM

{
  "name": "cashmoney",
  "compatibility_date": "2025-04-03",
  "compatibility_flags": ["nodejs_compat"],
  "observability": {
    "enabled": true,
    "head_sampling_rate": 1
  },
  "assets": {
    "not_found_handling": "single-page-application"
  },
  "main": "./worker/index.ts",
  "migrations": [
    {
      "new_classes": ["Arenas"],
      "tag": "v1"
    }
  ],
  "durable_objects": {
    "bindings": [
      {
        "class_name": "Arenas",
        "name": "ARENA"
      }
    ]
  },
  "vars": {
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN": "YOUR_TOKEN",
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL": "YOUR_TOKEN"
  }
}

{
  "name": "cashmoney",
  "compatibility_date": "2025-04-03",
  "compatibility_flags": ["nodejs_compat"],
  "observability": {
    "enabled": true,
    "head_sampling_rate": 1
  },
  "assets": {
    "not_found_handling": "single-page-application"
  },
  "main": "./worker/index.ts",
  "migrations": [
    {
      "new_classes": ["Arenas"],
      "tag": "v1"
    }
  ],
  "durable_objects": {
    "bindings": [
      {
        "class_name": "Arenas",
        "name": "ARENA"
      }
    ]
  },
  "vars": {
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN": "YOUR_TOKEN",
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL": "YOUR_TOKEN"
  }
}

John I.•6/5/25, 10:09 PM

Hi Guys Is there a way to disable "I'm Under Attack" mode across multiple domains in a single Cloudflare account?

IIsaac McFadyen Oh, do you mean DO KV?

Hard@Work•6/5/25, 10:10 PM

Workers Free plan: Only Durable Objects with SQLite storage backend are available.

JJohn I.Hi Guys Is there a way to disable "I'm Under Attack" mode across multiple domain...

Hard@Work•6/5/25, 10:10 PM

?crossposting

SuperHelpflare•6/5/25, 10:10 PM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

John I.•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

Okay I am sorry for that @Hard@Work

HHard@Work > Workers Free plan: Only Durable Objects with SQLite storage backend are availa...

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

Yes but the SQLite storage backend supports KV does it not?

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

It's just the backend specifically.

John I.•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

Not sure where I can get the right channel for this concern

IIsaac McFadyen Yes but the SQLite storage backend supports KV does it not?

Hard@Work•6/5/25, 10:12 PM

But yeah, @Ibby_debug , you need new_sqlite_classesnew_sqlite_classes in

migrations

migrations

, not new_classesnew_classes

{ "name": "cashmoney", "compatibility_date": "2025-04-03", "compatibility_flags": ["nodejs_compat"], "observability": { "enabled": true, "head_sampling_rate": 1 }, "assets": { "not_found_handling": "single-page-application" }, "main": "./worker/index.ts", "migrations": [ { "new_classes": ["Arenas"], "tag": "v1" } ], "durable_objects": { "bindings": [ { "class_name": "Arenas", "name": "ARENA" } ] }, "vars": { "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN": "YOUR_TOKEN", "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL": "YOUR_TOKEN" } }

No. it only increases # of scripts, #of requests, and cpu time https://developers.cloudflare.com/clo

Similar Threads