Thank you! I saw the RPC stuff too. The bottom line is that user workers then always would have to b

Thank you! I saw the RPC stuff too. The bottom line is that user workers then always would have to be slightly different than 'regular' workers? I'm still trying to wrap my head around how user workers would have to be written differently.

Ddarkpool I'm waiting on workflows support. I was recently told that it should work with W...

christianklotzOP•6/5/25, 2:51 PM

Oh, I thought workflows were working on WfP?

Cchristianklotz Thank you! I saw the RPC stuff too. The bottom line is that user workers then al...

darkpool•6/5/25, 2:58 PM

Np. It took me a while to wrap my head around it too. Basically the only difference is how they're invoked. So a regular worker can't RPC a user worker, only a dispatch worker can. However, a user worker can RPC a regular worker directly. The docs dont show this but RPC does work

Cchristianklotz Oh, I thought workflows were working on WfP?

darkpool•6/5/25, 2:59 PM

not yet: workflowsI can't even get the [example](https://

demotime•6/5/25, 3:11 PM

hi all. I was trying to get workers for platforms working, but following the tutorial I couldn't get localdev setup. Does that tutorial still work?
Couldn't find

wrangler dev

wrangler dev

session for "customer-worker-1" in namespace "test" to proxy to

here's the wrangler config for the user-worker:

demotime•6/5/25, 3:11 PM

obviously there's a linter error there (why I screenshotted) - but that is what the tutorial says to do

demotime•6/5/25, 8:02 PM

Your Worker has access to the following bindings:

Durable Objects:
- MAIN_RUN_DO: MainRunObject
KV Namespaces:
- SEND_PROTECT: e5010ba5c178462a8ca7f227d7efa494 [simulated locally]
Dispatch Namespaces:
- DISPATCH_NAMESPACE: test [connected to remote resource]

But when trying to actually run the worker:
Couldn't find

wrangler dev

wrangler dev

session for "customer-worker-1" in namespace "test" to proxy to

Ddemotime Your Worker has access to the following bindings: ...

darkpool•6/5/25, 8:19 PM

are you using? npx wrangler@dispatch-namespaces-devnpx wrangler@dispatch-namespaces-dev to start user and dispatch workers?

demotime•6/5/25, 8:19 PM

yes

Ddarkpool are you using? `npx wrangler@dispatch-namespaces-dev` to start user and dispatch...

demotime•6/5/25, 8:20 PM

yes, i was just about to experiment with a globally installed version

Ddemotime yes, i was just about to experiment with a globally installed version

darkpool•6/5/25, 8:22 PM

are you using wrangler.toml?

Ddarkpool are you using wrangler.toml?

demotime•6/5/25, 8:23 PM

wrangler.jsonc

darkpool•6/5/25, 8:27 PM

when I setup local dev a few months ago jsonc did not work. Not sure if that's changed. I made a bug report https://github.com/issues/created?issue=cloudflare%7Ccloudflare-docs%7C21037

demotime•6/5/25, 8:28 PM

ok, will try that. thanks

darkpool•6/5/25, 8:33 PM

also maybe try restarting machine. I forgot I was running into same issue a when i set it up lol workers-for-platforms

demotime•6/5/25, 8:52 PM

thanks for the help. unfortunately i tried globally installing wrangler, npx wrangler, running it direct from CLI etc. and all permutations failed. also tried replacing .jsonc with .toml
i don't know if there's any debugging steps available for wrangler

demotime•6/5/25, 8:54 PM

ok wow the restart seemed to help (even though the processes were restarted many, many times) - thank you @darkpool

demotime•6/5/25, 8:59 PM

does anyone know if we can pair a local dispatch worker with a remote/deployed userscript

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 9:49 PM

Hey guys I also have a similar issue but not sure where to fix it tbh

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 9:49 PM

I'm following the https://github.com/upstash/examples/blob/main/examples/cloudflare-websockets example code!

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:02 PM

Can i still use a key-value store in free plan ?

IIbby | Fk Israel Can i still use a key-value store in free plan ?

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:05 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/kv/platform/limits/ Yes, up to a certain quota.

IIsaac McFadyen <https://developers.cloudflare.com/kv/platform/limits/> Yes, up to a certain quo...

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:07 PM

Yeah but I’m getting that 10097 error! I just changed the class_name from the example repo. I’ll make sure it’s the same elsewhere as well

IIbby | Fk Israel Yeah but I’m getting that 10097 error! I just changed the class_name from the ex...

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

Oh, do you mean DO KV?

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

You can use DO KV, but you have to add a migration to your wrangler.toml/wrangler.jsonc file. Can you show what you have currently?

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

Well it’s the Upstash redis that I’m trying to use. Same thing used in the example repo

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:08 PM

Absolutely

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:09 PM

{
  "name": "cashmoney",
  "compatibility_date": "2025-04-03",
  "compatibility_flags": ["nodejs_compat"],
  "observability": {
    "enabled": true,
    "head_sampling_rate": 1
  },
  "assets": {
    "not_found_handling": "single-page-application"
  },
  "main": "./worker/index.ts",
  "migrations": [
    {
      "new_classes": ["Arenas"],
      "tag": "v1"
    }
  ],
  "durable_objects": {
    "bindings": [
      {
        "class_name": "Arenas",
        "name": "ARENA"
      }
    ]
  },
  "vars": {
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN": "YOUR_TOKEN",
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL": "YOUR_TOKEN"
  }
}

{
  "name": "cashmoney",
  "compatibility_date": "2025-04-03",
  "compatibility_flags": ["nodejs_compat"],
  "observability": {
    "enabled": true,
    "head_sampling_rate": 1
  },
  "assets": {
    "not_found_handling": "single-page-application"
  },
  "main": "./worker/index.ts",
  "migrations": [
    {
      "new_classes": ["Arenas"],
      "tag": "v1"
    }
  ],
  "durable_objects": {
    "bindings": [
      {
        "class_name": "Arenas",
        "name": "ARENA"
      }
    ]
  },
  "vars": {
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN": "YOUR_TOKEN",
    "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL": "YOUR_TOKEN"
  }
}

John I.•6/5/25, 10:09 PM

Hi Guys Is there a way to disable "I'm Under Attack" mode across multiple domains in a single Cloudflare account?

IIsaac McFadyen Oh, do you mean DO KV?

Hard@Work•6/5/25, 10:10 PM

Workers Free plan: Only Durable Objects with SQLite storage backend are available.

JJohn I.Hi Guys Is there a way to disable "I'm Under Attack" mode across multiple domain...

Hard@Work•6/5/25, 10:10 PM

?crossposting

SuperHelpflare•6/5/25, 10:10 PM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

John I.•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

Okay I am sorry for that @Hard@Work

HHard@Work > Workers Free plan: Only Durable Objects with SQLite storage backend are availa...

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

Yes but the SQLite storage backend supports KV does it not?

Isaac McFadyen•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

It's just the backend specifically.

John I.•6/5/25, 10:11 PM

Not sure where I can get the right channel for this concern

IIsaac McFadyen Yes but the SQLite storage backend supports KV does it not?

Hard@Work•6/5/25, 10:12 PM

But yeah, @Ibby_debug , you need

new_sqlite_classes

new_sqlite_classes

migrations

migrations

, not

new_classes

new_classes

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:15 PM

thing is I tried with both. new_sqlite_classes throws

 Cannot apply new-class migration to class 'Arenas' that is not exported by script. [code: 10070]

 Cannot apply new-class migration to class 'Arenas' that is not exported by script. [code: 10070]

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/5/25, 10:16 PM

I probably need to organize my code into one file since I already had a index file setup and routing to the other. Anyways, I'll keep debugging it and let you guys know

Ibby | Fk Israel•6/6/25, 1:34 AM

dangelo•6/6/25, 4:36 AM

Does Workers for Platforms work with Durable Objects? I didn't see that mentioned in the documentation. Thanks!

demotime•6/6/25, 7:47 AM

does anyone know whether we can run user-workers with a regular http url/api, or if it's ONLY via. the dynamic dispatch worker?

demotime•6/6/25, 8:06 AM

it's very awkward running locally, because the flow goes:

edit user code & run

but the APIs to create/edit users-workers seem to not have a local equivalent. so there's no (simple) way to save and test a change, which is pretty fundamental WFP interaction? Also makes it very hard to test the combined code when we add platform stuff to user-stuff

if there's a way to just run the production worker from local that would be one solution I think. interested how anyone else gets around this or what I'm missing

Ddangelo Does Workers for Platforms work with Durable Objects? I didn't see that mentione...

christianklotzOP•6/6/25, 8:35 AM

workers-for-platforms yesterday

demotime•6/6/25, 9:43 AM

i guess i could deploy a proxy dispatch worker, then abstract a proxyOrRun method, if env.proxyDispatchUrl is set go via. that. anyone happen to know any best practice or workflow which would let us deploy and test scripts locally (local env, local dispatch worker, scripts either locally emulated or production ones)

Ddemotime does anyone know whether we can run user-workers with a regular http url/api, or...

darkpool•6/6/25, 1:51 PM

no public url. pretty sure dispatch is only option.

Ddemotime it's very awkward running locally, because the flow goes: - edit user code & ru...

darkpool•6/6/25, 1:54 PM

maybe im not understanding but in my case I simulate local dev with treating the user code as a module and importing it before wrapping my own platform code around it to "hydrate" it. Also you can run dispatch locally with --remote to test deployed user workers

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 5:18 PM

In the call accounts/{account_id}/workers/ dispatch/namespaces/ {dispatch_namespace}/scripts/ {script_name}

Is there a way to also bind the domain? Or must that be a seperate call

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 5:18 PM

~~Currently I can create the worker programmatically but I cannot figure out how to bind a domain~~
Resolved by just properly using a dispatch worker

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 5:18 PM

And it doesn't even have a default workers.dev domain

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 6:35 PM

if not, is there a "workers for platforms" equivilant of https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/workers/subresources/domains/methods/update/

Cloudflare API | Workers › Domains › Attach To Domain

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

{ "name": "cashmoney", "compatibility_date": "2025-04-03", "compatibility_flags": ["nodejs_compat"], "observability": { "enabled": true, "head_sampling_rate": 1 }, "assets": { "not_found_handling": "single-page-application" }, "main": "./worker/index.ts", "migrations": [ { "new_classes": ["Arenas"], "tag": "v1" } ], "durable_objects": { "bindings": [ { "class_name": "Arenas", "name": "ARENA" } ] }, "vars": { "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN": "YOUR_TOKEN", "UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL": "YOUR_TOKEN" } }

Thank you! I saw the RPC stuff too. The bottom line is that user workers then always would have to b

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads