We should probably make tailing available too for WfP sub though, will chat with the PM on Monday.

R

Rafflesia•7/6/25, 6:52 PM

alright

R

Rafflesia•7/6/25, 7:26 PM

I just bought workers paid and it seems to work fine

WWalshy We should probably make tailing available too for WfP sub though, will chat with...

K

KernelDeimos•7/7/25, 1:31 AM

yeah extra fee for that is not an issue but just inconvenient, it seems a little silly IMO

V

Village (Josef)•7/8/25, 9:15 PM

Hey, is there any way to set up Email Routing for Workers for Platforms/Cloudflare for SaaS? I'm essentially hoping to be able to process any emails sent through client domains (obviously if they've configured it to do so) through an Email Worker.

N

nickyang•7/11/25, 8:53 AM

Hi everyone, I am creating a worker through the API

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/${CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/${DISPATCH_NAMESPACE}/scripts/${WORKER_NAME}/content

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/${CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/${DISPATCH_NAMESPACE}/scripts/${WORKER_NAME}/content

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/${CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/${DISPATCH_NAMESPACE}/scripts/${WORKER_NAME}/content

https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/${CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID}/workers/dispatch/namespaces/${DISPATCH_NAMESPACE}/scripts/${WORKER_NAME}/content

; This API created a worker and encountered a problem {
code: 10013,
message: 'An unknown error has occurred. If this error persists, please file a report in workers-sdk (https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues) or reach out to your account team.'
} What should I do?

GitHub

cloudflare/workers-sdk

Home to Wrangler, the CLI for Cloudflare Workers® - cloudflare/workers-sdk

R

Rafflesia•7/15/25, 10:43 PM

hey what changed between compatibility date 2025-05-04 and 2025-05-05?
I have code which I cant share currently which is broken on 2025-05-04 but works on 2025-05-05, if I leave compatibility date blank its also broken

R

Rafflesia•7/15/25, 10:52 PM

I found what changed that day, weakref

JJefferson Hi everyone, according the documentation for cfp it's required to create a bindi...

N

nclevenger•7/16/25, 9:34 PM

Is there a solution to passing parameters into the outbound worker? I'm seeing this exact error from following the docs exactly, and i've tried a bunch of variations, but i still get a 500 error anytime the

outbound.parameters

outbound.parameters

outbound.parameters

outbound.parameters property is set

C

Caião, o Brabo•7/17/25, 9:27 AM

Hey

C

Caião, o Brabo•7/17/25, 9:27 AM

Someone can help me pls

S

SuperHelpflare•7/17/25, 3:20 PM

https://dontasktoask.com/

Don't ask to ask, just ask

JJefferson Hi everyone, according the documentation for cfp it's required to create a bindi...

N

nclevenger•7/17/25, 6:04 PM

@Jefferson did you figure out the problem with the config to support outbound parameters? i've wasted hours with this same issue and i haven't been able to figure it out for some reason ... it does a hard crash that can't be catched even with a try/catch ...

SSaumya M Does anyone here know how to access the `cf` object data inside a namespaced use...

H

Hard@Work•7/23/25, 7:05 PM

You mean like

request.cf

request.cf

request.cf

request.cf? It should be present if you pass it in

Original message was deleted

H

Hard@Work•7/23/25, 7:05 PM

?pings

S

SuperHelpflare•7/23/25, 7:05 PM

Please do not ping community members for non-moderation reasons. Doing so will not solve your issue faster and will make people less likely to want to help you.

SSaumya M yes `request.cf` is blank inside the user worker

H

Hard@Work•7/23/25, 7:06 PM

In the Dispatch Worker?

SSaumya M In Dispatch worker it works cause that is a normal worker and not a namespace wo...

H

Hard@Work•7/23/25, 7:08 PM

And you are doing something like

let userWorker = env.dispatcher.get(workerName);
return await userWorker.fetch(request);

let userWorker = env.dispatcher.get(workerName);
return await userWorker.fetch(request);

let userWorker = env.dispatcher.get(workerName);
return await userWorker.fetch(request);

let userWorker = env.dispatcher.get(workerName);
return await userWorker.fetch(request);

without modifying/creating a new Request?

Rrye Is there an ideal workflow to get containers working on "Workers for platforms"?

R

rye•7/23/25, 11:07 PM

R

rye•7/23/25, 11:07 PM

Bumping this

SSaumya M yes `request.cf` is blank inside the user worker

R

Rafflesia•7/24/25, 1:32 AM

To be honest I just assumed this was intentional but yeah I have the exact same issue

R

Rafflesia•7/24/25, 1:32 AM

Workers in a dispatch namespace don't have event.request.cf but the dispatch worker itself does

W

WalshyOP•7/24/25, 9:55 AM

It is intentional

W

WalshyOP•7/24/25, 9:56 AM

We'll document how to make this work but note that this default behaviour is intentional.

R

rye•7/24/25, 1:35 PM

Is there an ideal workflow to get containers working on "Workers for platforms"? @Walshy | DevPlat EE @Hard@Work | R2 @Mike Nomitch | Workers PM

Rrye Is there an ideal workflow to get containers working on "Workers for platforms"?...

I

Isaac McFadyen•7/24/25, 1:36 PM

?pings

S

SuperHelpflare•7/24/25, 1:36 PM

Please do not ping community members for non-moderation reasons. Doing so will not solve your issue faster and will make people less likely to want to help you.

R

rye•7/24/25, 1:37 PM

@Isaac | AS213339 Have you heard of any ideal workflows to get containers working on "Workers for platforms"?

Rrye @Isaac | AS213339 Have you heard of any ideal workflows to get containers workin...

I

Isaac McFadyen•7/24/25, 1:42 PM

As the message says, do not ping people please.

IIsaac McFadyen As the message says, do not ping people please.

R

rye•7/24/25, 1:43 PM

I'll take that as a no

V

Vlad Lykhonis•7/27/25, 5:03 PM

Hey all. Anyone tried to measure cpu time of a child worker? All in all I was only able to limit cpu time and obviously measure wall time.

Graphql analytics isn’t option for me due to latency, rate limits, etc.

VVlad Lykhonis Hey all. Anyone tried to measure cpu time of a child worker? All in all I was on...

P

Peps•7/27/25, 11:50 PM

tried using a tail worker?

XxPhi is ok to post job offer here?

V

Vero•7/28/25, 1:16 PM

No https://discord.com/channels/595317990191398933/775391577790611466/1060602630608519208

PPeps tried using a tail worker?

V

Vlad Lykhonis•7/28/25, 2:40 PM

No, but this seems overly complicated for what I want.

What I want is this:

const cpuLimit = 200;

const worker = c.env.appServiceDispatcher.get(
  c.var.serviceUuid,
  {},
  {
    limits: {
      cpuMs: cpuLimit,
    },
  }
);

const startTime = performance.now();
const response = await worker.fetch(request);
const endTime = performance.now();

const duration = Math.min(Math.floor(endTime - startTime), cpuLimit);

const cpuLimit = 200;

const worker = c.env.appServiceDispatcher.get(
  c.var.serviceUuid,
  {},
  {
    limits: {
      cpuMs: cpuLimit,
    },
  }
);

const startTime = performance.now();
const response = await worker.fetch(request);
const endTime = performance.now();

const duration = Math.min(Math.floor(endTime - startTime), cpuLimit);

const cpuLimit = 200;

const worker = c.env.appServiceDispatcher.get(
  c.var.serviceUuid,
  {},
  {
    limits: {
      cpuMs: cpuLimit,
    },
  }
);

const startTime = performance.now();
const response = await worker.fetch(request);
const endTime = performance.now();

const duration = Math.min(Math.floor(endTime - startTime), cpuLimit);

const cpuLimit = 200;

const worker = c.env.appServiceDispatcher.get(
  c.var.serviceUuid,
  {},
  {
    limits: {
      cpuMs: cpuLimit,
    },
  }
);

const startTime = performance.now();
const response = await worker.fetch(request);
const endTime = performance.now();

const duration = Math.min(Math.floor(endTime - startTime), cpuLimit);

One of obvious ways is to simply return some sort of CF- header indicating stats back to calling worker/dispatcher?

I do not think creating new worker to observe my customers workers execution is viable here.

VVlad Lykhonis No, but this seems overly complicated for what I want. What I want is this: ```...

P

Peps•7/28/25, 3:15 PM

not sure i quite understand, because in your example you're basically measuring wall time, not CPU. Any fetches done in the worker would add up to that.
Right now I believe the only solid way of getting the CPU time is by either using a tail worker or logpush. Perhaps in the future we'll get more ways of measuring CPU time

PPeps not sure i quite understand, because in your example you're basically measuring ...

V

Vlad Lykhonis•7/28/25, 7:46 PM

Yes I need cpu time not wall time. The best thing I was able to do is measure wall time and cap it at a cpu limit I specify.

It’s quite important for my product, because by definition workers I deployed are my customers code, and I want to charge them by cpu time of their code.

Would not it be possible to simply return some headers back to dispatcher worker? It’s a common pattern in several other products I think?!

W

WalshyOP•7/28/25, 7:47 PM

Your best bet would be a tail Worker

W

WalshyOP•7/28/25, 7:47 PM

and that seems like the better fit regardless, you'll want likely other stats from these and maybe logs. A Tail Worker will give you all info

WWalshy and that seems like the better fit regardless, you'll want likely other stats fr...

V

Vlad Lykhonis•7/28/25, 7:56 PM

Okay I will look into this more. It seems it will cost extra to run it though. It doesn’t scale well considering I’m trying to price CpU time for my customers same as CF does

Maybe I miss understanding tail workers. Will read more.

W

WalshyOP•7/28/25, 7:57 PM

Tail Workers do not cost a request, only CPU which if you're just sending off elsewhere will be basically 0 ms

W

WalshyOP•7/28/25, 7:57 PM

So it should be extremely cheap

WWalshy Tail Workers do _not_ cost a request, only CPU which if you're just sending off ...

V

Vlad Lykhonis•7/28/25, 7:59 PM

Makes sense. Since most of it will be io indeed. This will also scale later for me as we will add observability features. Thank you!

WWalshy Your best bet would be a tail Worker

V

Vlad Lykhonis•7/28/25, 8:20 PM

Would you have some pointers on how to get CPU time? I will test out events received tomorrow.

W

WalshyOP•7/28/25, 8:36 PM

When you get your event, it should have a

cpuTime

cpuTime

cpuTime

cpuTime and

wallTime

wallTime

wallTime

wallTime

We should probably make tailing available too for WfP sub though, will chat with the PM on Monday.

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads