@codefrau I launched the links on my PC now (with VPN)
@codefrau I launched the links on my PC now (with VPN)
CSo that's the connection from Amsterdam then - can you try without VPN? 50 ms to FRA still seems like a lot
ADone 
C32ms, that looks better
ASo 32 ms is roundtime from my PC to FRA via CPH?
Cyes
Cthe worker is in CPH and the DO in FRA
ADoesn't 50 ms seem seem alright then, if it's from my PC -> Amsterdam (VPN) -> CPH (Worker) -> FRA (DO)?
CI guess it is – I am spoiled by having the worker right here next to me 
AI don't think there's anything to do about the ~10 ms latency added just to get out of the house 
Athis is COAX after all
AAnyways, thanks a lot for the help
CYou're welcome 
CJust to correct this - your connection from Amsterdam did not go via CPH. There is a colo in AMS, so that’s where the worker was.
C(the “via” item in the latency display is the worker colo)
AAhh, alright - that's quite slow then, as I get 26 ms latency when running a Speedtest on the VPN. Cloudflare does peer with M247 in Amsterdam, right?
AHmm, pinging (on VPN to M247 in Amsterdam) gives me a latency of 28 ms, so perhaps the route between AMS and FRA is just slow for some reason?
IIs it possible to move an web-socket connection from the worker to a durable object?
Cyes, you pass the websocket request (with the "Upgrade: websocket" header) to the DO via
KWhen I have durable object, let's call it xyz I must use fetch to communicate with it?
or could I call it's functions directly?
example: xyz.storage.get('key');
or could I call it's functions directly?
example: xyz.storage.get('key');
CYes, fetch only
Kok, thanks
KIt looks like we have some sort of bug where some errors like this happen while we roll out an update to the workers runtime. We are looking into it. (FWIW, whenever you see "internal error" that means we think it's our bug, not yours, and the error has already been reported to our internal monitoring.)
AI need to use an NPM package in my Durable Object project - can someone tell me which of these templates would allow me to do that? Thanks!
https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-template
https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-rollup-esm
https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-webpack-commonjs
https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-template
https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-rollup-esm
https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-webpack-commonjs
MGitHub
Template for durable objects, rollup, es modules. Contribute to cloudflare/durable-objects-rollup-esm development by creating an account on GitHub.
MIt even shows importing a package in the example entrypoint: https://github.com/cloudflare/durable-objects-rollup-esm/blob/master/src/index.mjs
GitHub
Template for durable objects, rollup, es modules. Contribute to cloudflare/durable-objects-rollup-esm development by creating an account on GitHub.
AAlright. Thanks!
M(I use Rollup on my own projects, and ES Modules are the way forward, especially with Durable Objects / Workers’ Modules API)
IIs it possible to know where in the world the durable object is?
Jone way is to fetch from inside the DO, and cache the colo field from that trace
Jiirc module workers are now passed a
cfRequestfetchcfcfstateYeah having the CF property specific for the worker would be great!
Jin case you haven't seen it, check out https://where.durableobjects.live/ by @jedschmidt, a cool idea to find out which cf colos support DOs at the moment
AJhehe, probably a colo he doesn
Jt have his master list yet
AIt's on VPN to Albania - thought I'd populate the list some more
Jit would be so nice to be able to send a worker request to a specific colo for testing this sort of thing
AAcorrect colo this time
Await,
Jmaybe pager went off : )
Aseems to change a lot from this location
AA- it was 44% when I started
Jdenominator+++++++
AAlright, I "managed" to bring the percentage down to 37. Won't spend anymore time on this
JJ(tho should’ve handled that more gracefully)