I doubt it very much, likely it'll primarily support FSR and XeSS
I doubt it very much, likely it'll primarily support FSR and XeSS
Kand anything else that can be supported as open source, like LatencyFlex over Nvidia Reflex
Hi try to be as hardware and software agnostic as possible with what i do as long as it acomplishes what i want to
Aor could use gamescope for fsr or dlss
©I don't care anymore whats "best", all i care about timely and proper support for LINUX... which nVidia has killed for it self for me in past decades
Kgamescope has no dlss support, and it only offers FSR 1.0
Always better to use FSR built into the games you're playing
Always better to use FSR built into the games you're playing
Kor the DLSS2FSR tool
Ai meant nis nvidia upscaling
Hanyways i have to go, have a nice day/evening/night/morning $TIMEOFDAY
RI see, thank you. I'd be willing to forego DLSS (for FSR/XeSS) if AMD GPU's also weren't inferior (in a major way) in raytracing perf compared to Nvidia cards.
Ais it true intel and amd has open source drivers since begining of linux at start?
©That's just temporarily, AMD has always been superior in CPU's so i dont doubt they will comeup with something better as nVidea soon or in near future....
PI think I only have one game that really has ray tracing that I've noticed
Kpath traced half-life
©RayTracing is over hyped, no games REALLY use or need it yet...
PI also didn't feel like spending a used car worth of cash on my gpu. And I wanted it to just work
RI disagree with this take, raytracing can be way more transformative to game visuals than any raster perf increase at this point of 'diminishing returns'.
Asame thing with nvidia overhyped when rtx 40 series came out lol
©I didn't say the tech is worthless, it can improve stuff yes...but it's NOT needed (required) yet by most games...
Acurious to ask whats better in terms gpu fans single or dual or triple?
PThe only good thing about Nvidia is it led me to discover ublue before I upgraded to an amd :p
©The time of RayTracing will start when 99% of user computers are all using GPU's that support RayTracing, untill then all games will support non RT just to be able to sell to those users also...
Asame here it led me here cuz of it
Ajust like all games werent supporting linux until steamdeck came along and made it popular which it forced most game developers to support linux lol
©Want to know a fun but sad info from me?
I bought a new system just because i was fed up with the Broadcom driver in my old MB not allowing me to setup an WiFi-AP...
But now im screwed again by Intel due to AX210 on my MB and their driver disables AP's in any higher as 2.4GHz... FU Intel+nVidia from my side...
I bought a new system just because i was fed up with the Broadcom driver in my old MB not allowing me to setup an WiFi-AP...
But now im screwed again by Intel due to AX210 on my MB and their driver disables AP's in any higher as 2.4GHz... FU Intel+nVidia from my side...
©EXACTLY...
PEvery game console uses amd for graphics, and consoles are something like.. 70% of game market?
RDo they really though? Unless by 'supporting Linux' you mean - somebody cares to test whether it launches in Proton properly.
©Time of nVidia and Intel are counted since years, but their end is coming soon(tm) i hope
GWe shouldn't hope that their "end" is coming soon at all. We should just hope for more open source technologies allowing us to be agnostic with what hardware we choose. Intel is already very good at this front along with AMD
GI look forward to NVK and what it will bring
PI haven't had any issues with Intel, I just went amd CPU to match the gpu. Idk if it matters I just figured it might be smoother than mixing
©Intel is smarter as nVidia in that aspect because it sees it end if it doesn't support Linux sooner as later...
©Example Intel is STILL doing STUPID stuff with Linux drivers (AX210)
Anvidia is slow in keeping up with linux support lol
PArc gpu having a huge performance hit on older directx turned me away. A large percentage of my game time is in games that are like 10 years old
Athey fix something and other things it break
©Slow? now THATS an understatement... 
Awhat is then?
GTo be fair, so is AMD, lol. They've gotten the support they have because they opened their driver stack. If they didn't, I guarantee it would have been just as slow or worse than Nvidia's support
©That was a reply to this one i quoted...
GAnd in fact, it was worse for a long time. You basically had to use Nvidia back in the day
Aim aware
VThe best way to make a driver stack is to let literally anybody else do it
GAgreed
GThe open source community has many eyes on the code at once
©Anyhow, both companies Intel and nVidia are like (or actually are?) Micro$@$ with their closed source crap stuff...
Anvidia still refusing to open source of their drivers lol
PIntel has quite a bit of open source afaik
GThe drawback to the open source approach is you need to be on bleeding edge kernel and mesa versions for new hardware support (and even then, it's not immediate). With Nvidia's blob, it's pretty much immediate support
GSupport does end up being far better in the long term with AMD
