I think all the Ublue/fedora systems are pipewire default these days
I think all the Ublue/fedora systems are pipewire default these days
P800gb needs a real library server
Jalsa raw has its own set of issues avoiding exclusivity and picking the right devices
Jbut less complexity and odd issues past that
RWell yeah that I'm aware of lol. that's the whole thing tho is to play things raw. I used to do that in foobar in Windows, set my audio output to exclusive
Jig technically you could kill pipewire and make stuff work but probably not worth the hassle
WThat's what my media PC is, foobar2000 adds all that to a dynamically searchable library with zero perceivable lag. I can find a album with like, 3 button presses or search a entire genre or year like that too.
Meanwhile in Linux on like Clementine/Audacious/deadbeef it just freezes when I try that.
Meanwhile in Linux on like Clementine/Audacious/deadbeef it just freezes when I try that.
RI've been able to get Audacious to run with ALSA Output, with that I can play Hi-Res audio as it is.
JI used to run alsa only on arch in the early 2010s but been a minute
JPipewire has wrappers around alsa/pulseaudio/jack so most things end up routed there unless you change that I think
Pexpectations vs reality. any random audio player is not necessarily good at storing metadata properly.
Plook at an actual backing server like navidrome if you need to handle 800gb worth of music efficiently
WYeah, my reality was just buying a little mini ATX box to deal with it.
Someday I will figure out installing Foobar2000 on Linux in a way that has zero issues, or maybe Peter will just finally port it over.
Someday I will figure out installing Foobar2000 on Linux in a way that has zero issues, or maybe Peter will just finally port it over.
Pbig if true tbh
Rand that's exactly what I did lol
Pfoobar is a fossil
Pa big pretty fossil
Vthey did a modern complete rewrite
Vthere's now foobar and foobar classic
Pis it still hilariously tied to windows
JI remember that at least old foobar was very tied into Visual C++ and various windows toolkits
Pyeah old foobar was crusty as hell
Jso it'd probably have to be an entire rewrite to port it over
Pidk what the situation is with new foobar though.
Cwhat just happened ? 
Pdoes the rewrite still rely on 1000 microsoft toolkits anyway?
RAnyone willing to reverse-engineer foobar to find out tho?
Pwhat
Vi'm more of a musicbee person but i still enjoy foobar for simple playlist playing and quick tag editing. it's still a powerful and lightweight player though
Vrecently found g4music for simple local music playing on linux, though it doesn't really have any features beyond that
Jshort version is
But you shouldn't run commands from random people on discord so see announcement
But you shouldn't run commands from random people on discord so see announcement
Ppls dont try to reverse foobar you will go to the squishy comfy room
Cthank you
Pthat's kinda their whole deal
JI like that Strawberry has subsonic/airsonic/navidrome integration but it's pretty crusty and slow
Pstrawberry's subsonic is ass
JSupersonic is the best desktop subsonic client I've used but it has some rough edges
Pi tried to connect strawberry to a funkwhale server and it exploded
Pit ""works""
JSubsonic doesn't handle Japanese characters right which is a non-starter for a lot of people
Pif you can wait 10 years
Jbut it actually functions which is nice
VI have 350GB music library. Just gave up and installed Jellyfin to manage and listen it.
JHow's jellyfin doing these days with Music
JLast I touched it was not pleasant
RThis is EXACTLY why I LOVE foobar
VPretty good actually, there is dedicated music players for mobile (Finamp) and in desktop it also runs in app/browser quite nice
Pjellyfin is great
Plove jellyfin
VI also have really complicated music library setup. It's actually iTunes library on a NAS because I have iPod and MacBook. Jellyfin is pointed into the contents of that library and picks everything up for non-Apple devices.
