My mac is iNo, "oh no", my watch is iWey (I bet y'all can understand that one), and the phone is iPerrote, that's because my first iPhone that I bought was the 11, which I called iPerro, "oh dog!", then I got the 12 mini, so I used the diminutive, iPerrito, "oh doggy!", and finally I got the 15 Pro Max, so now is iPerrote, "oh big dog!", in Mexico we say "Hay (i) perro" as an exclamation
Theres bound to be someone out there with that skillset that will come along. to take the gif above and make it a boot logo id imagine should be real easy, I might tinker with that at some point.
we could use both, like using the gif's logos slowing getting introduced with colourful backgrounds, then the official logo at the end with a bit of zoom in on a black background with the bazzite title slowly appearing
The general public hates anything AI generated being used with a passion, I would avoid using anything AI at all personally. It's a fun toy, but that is it.
Besides, what's the functional difference on training an AI on the styles of other artists vs a human doing it, apart from the AI being faster? That's where that argument kind of falls apart for me. If I personally practice drawing like other artists, and mix those styles to make something, it's somehow fine, but if I write a program to do it, it's suddenly the devil. I feel like most of the arguments against AI generated art are emotional, not logical or reasonable.
Art will just become like luxury cars and hand crafted furniture. Low to mid range will be automated, high end will command high end prices and be a luxury. Can't put the genie back in the bottle, after all.
@Kyle Gospo I have translated the new stuff and added the new secure boot section, however when I'm doing a PR to merge the changes, GitHub wants to PR other older commits that have been already been merged
Artists complains about AI because is taking the personal styles of thousands of artists without any retribution, stealing potential customers and ruining the livelyhood of thousands
When you learn to draw, you develop your own drawing style, something that took hundreds if not thousands of hours to perfect, yeah, you can try and mimic the style of somebody else (rocko edits comes at the top of my head), but again, is somebody that spent a lot of time to perfect, specially if you ask for permission, and you do it as a tribute, that's okay
Sure, but 1) any human could do the same, and 2) this happens with every disruptive new technology. No one needs Ice vendors now that home refrigerators exist, either.
I mean, if we take that argument and expand it, what even are we doing here, collaborating to this project? Just let copilot do all the programming, and an AI to translate everything
we are using the basic creative skills we have to make something, its not about stealing money from artists, we are the artists here, if we had to commission these kind of stuff not only will takes months, will probably costs a lot for a free opensource project
That's still an emotional argument, and doesn't reflect the reality that this tech exists and isn't going to magically vanish. There's a reason SAG-AFTA had to agree to allow AI generated actors, voices, etc, in the latest agreements that ended the strike that industry was having. It's just plain not going to vanish. All this effort spent railing against it existing at all would be better spent figuring out how to transition things to the new reality that creative industries will have to live with.
Correct! They decided that the logo was ugly, and needed a redesign, and so, they used their own time and expertise to design the branding we all agree is great
for an animation is justified, i dont think kyle or jorge want to pay 100+ for each image inside the gif and another 300+ for the animation, we are trying to make the job easier here